RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Analysis of SIL to LSIS Train Control System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106348827

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Applying a quantitative approach, this paper demonstrates the results of LSIS (LSIS Co., Ltd.) Safety IntegrityLevel (SIL) allocation for a Train Control System (TCS). TCS is defined in this paper as the set of Automatic TrainProtection (ATP), Automat...

      Applying a quantitative approach, this paper demonstrates the results of LSIS (LSIS Co., Ltd.) Safety IntegrityLevel (SIL) allocation for a Train Control System (TCS). TCS is defined in this paper as the set of Automatic TrainProtection (ATP), Automatic Train Operation (ATO) and Computer Based Interlocking (CBI). SIL allocation is performedfor these constituent subsystems of TCS. Systematic approaches for SIL allocation widely used in railway applicationsare compared in terms of the quantity of allocation results. The quantitative method, based on a risk matrix andthe relationship between Tolerable Hazard Rate (THR) and SIL, is more credible than the qualitative method, in thesense that it utilizes more information (e.g., risk reduction factors involved in hazard occurrence) than the qualitativemethod, which purely depends on the configuration of the Risk Matrix Graph. Based on the principles of the quantitativemethod, the SIL allocation process is performed for the subsystems composing TCS. In conclusion, total hazardwas verified such that THR is fulfilled to the corresponding SIL level, which was allocated to each function of ATP,ATO and CBI through quantitative Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) for TCS. THR allocations of each hazard are verifiedbased on calculated failure frequency of the top event. This study has been able to enhance the reliability and safety ofTCS under international standards.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장승환, "Study on the Analysis of Safety Integrity Level to Railway Signaling" 대한설비관리학회 20 (20): 69-76, 2015

      2 International electronical committee, "Railway applications – Specification and demonstration of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS), IEC 62278"

      3 International electronical committee, "Railway applications – Communication, signalling and processing systems – Software for railway control and protection systems, IEC 62279"

      4 International electronical committee, "Railway applications – Communication, signalling and processing systems Safety related electronic systems for signaling, IEC 62425"

      5 International electronical committee, "Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), IEC 61025"

      6 P. Gruhn, "Different SIL(Safety Integrity Level) Selection Techniques Can Yield Significantly Different Answers" 2004

      1 장승환, "Study on the Analysis of Safety Integrity Level to Railway Signaling" 대한설비관리학회 20 (20): 69-76, 2015

      2 International electronical committee, "Railway applications – Specification and demonstration of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS), IEC 62278"

      3 International electronical committee, "Railway applications – Communication, signalling and processing systems – Software for railway control and protection systems, IEC 62279"

      4 International electronical committee, "Railway applications – Communication, signalling and processing systems Safety related electronic systems for signaling, IEC 62425"

      5 International electronical committee, "Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), IEC 61025"

      6 P. Gruhn, "Different SIL(Safety Integrity Level) Selection Techniques Can Yield Significantly Different Answers" 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-03-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 학국철도학회논문집 -> 한국철도학회논문집 KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-09-02 학술지등록 한글명 : 학국철도학회논문집
      외국어명 : JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY FOR RAILWAY
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.43 0.43 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.41 0.39 0.864 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼