교육수화 통역의 평가자간 평가기준 조율 가능성에 대한 사례분석 = An Case Analysis on the Possibility of Coordinating Evaluation Standards among Evaluators in Relation to Educational Sign Language Interpretation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study compared the results of evaluating the interpretation competencies of the students taking ‘Educational Interpretation’ in Department of Sign Language Interpreting Education in N University. Student evaluations were requested from educators in charge of sign language interpretation to investigate whether or not evaluation standards could be coordinated and the cases were analyzed. Four evaluators graded the interpreting results of five students who obtained excellent scored in the final evaluation among students who took the course, ‘Educational Interpretation’ in the first semester of 2013 and freely describe detailed evaluation standards. As a result, even though they had similar evaluation standards, evaluators gave different priorities in application to show big differences in evaluation results. Two evaluators who had showed the greatest difference among four evaluators passed through the coordination process to investigate where or not the coordination could be made to overcome the difference among evaluators. As a result, it was found that evaluation standards were able to be coordinated. There was the accordance rate of 66.7% as a result of evaluating the final exams of all students who had taken the course based on the coordinated standards. Lastly, as a result of putting the third evaluator who had not been involved in the previous evaluation to evaluate all students, the accordance rate with the results of the previously coordinated evaluators was significantly low. This result proves that the objectivity of evaluation can be secured through the coordination of evaluation standards. Therefore, it is implied that it is necessary to prepare evaluation standards in the curriculum for prospective interpreters.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 민은주, "한국어-한국수화 동시통역 사례분석 및 평가에 관한 연구" 나사렛대학교 대학원 2013

2 이연향, "통역학 입문" 이화여자대학교출판부 2009

3 정철자, "통역 평가 비교가능성: 교육상황에서의 사례연구" 통번역연구소 16 (16): 219-239, 2012

4 황주희, "청각장애인을 위한 수화통역서비스 의무제공 현황 및 활성화방안 모색 - 사법, 의료영역을 중심으로" 한국장애인복지학회 (20) : 63-87, 2013

5 최상배, "장애학생지원센터 수화통역사의 수화언어 동시통역 과정 분석 - H대학 장애학생지원센터를 중심으로 -" 한국특수아동학회 12 (12): 23-45, 2010

6 이혜승, "동시통역 품질 평가에 대한 경험적 연구 고찰" 통번역연구소 12 (12): 91-107, 2008

7 Sawyer, D. B., "The Intergration of Curriculum and Assessment in Interpreter Education: A Case Study doctoral dissertation"

8 Wu, S., "Some reliability issues of simultaneous interpreting assessment within the education context, In Teaching and testing interpreting and translating" 301-325, 2010

9 Shlesinger, M., "Quality in simultaneous interpreting, In Conference interpreting: current trends in research" Benjamins 123-131, 1997

10 Riccardi, A., "Evaluation in Interpreting, Teahing Translation and Interpreting 4, Building bridge" John Benjamins 115-126, 2002

11 Clifford, A., "Discourse theory and performance-based assessment : Two tools for professional interpreting" 46 (46): 365-378, 2001

12 Kurz, I., "Conference Interpreting: Quality in the Ears of the User" 45 (45): 394-409, 2001