Application of New Appliances for Management of Growing Class III Malocclusion Child: Comparazation Case Reports

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this comparison of case reports is to introduce the results of the application of new devices for the management of growing Class III malocclusions in children. Two 8-year-old boys had a chief complaint of anterior crossbite. Anterior crossbite correction using a tandem traction bow appliance (TTBA) or a Carriere Motion 3D Class III appliance with a Transforce appliance was planned. By comparing cephalometric radiographs before and after treatment, changes in skeletal growth and incisor inclination to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane could be measured. Both devices increased SNA and ANB angles, N –| Pg-A, U1 to SN, and U1 to FH. Both appliances improved facial features and resolution of anterior crossbite. The TTBA and Carriere Motion 3D Class III appliance had similar effects when applied as early treatment for growing mesio-occlusions and anterior crossbite in two boys. However, long-term outcome assessments and well-designed comparative studies are still required.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이상호, "소아에서 3급 부정교합의 진단과 처치" 대한소아치과학회 34 (34): 725-740, 2007

2 Azamian Z, "Treatment options for Class III malocclusion in growing patients with emphasis on maxillary protraction" 2016 : 8105163-, 2016

3 Baik HS, "Treatment effects of Fränkel functional regulator III in children with class III malocclusions" 125 : 294-301, 2004

4 Showkatbakhsh R, "The effects of facemask and reverse chin cup on maxillary deficient patients" 39 : 95-101, 2012

5 Kim JH, "The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: a metaanalysis" 115 : 675-685, 1999

6 Campbell PM, "The dilemma of Class III treatment. Early or late?" 53 : 175-191, 1983

7 Fudalej P, "Prediction of the outcome of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusions--a systematic review" 33 : 190-197, 2011

8 Toffol LD, "Orthopedic treatment outcomes in class III malocclusion. A systematic review" 78 : 561-573, 2008

9 Thiruvenkatachari B, "Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children" (11) : CD003452-, 2013

10 Carriére L, "Nonsurgical correction of severe skeletal Class III malocclusion" 50 : 216-230, 2016

11 Tortop T, "Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions" 84 : 642-648, 2014

12 Nakasima A, "Genetic and environmental factors in the development of so-called pseudo-and true mesiocclusions" 90 : 106-116, 1986

13 Minase RA, "Effectiveness of reverse twin block with lip pads-RME and face mask with RME in the early treatment of class III malocclusion" 20 : 14-, 2019

14 Woon SC, "Early orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and metaanalysis" 151 : 28-52, 2017

15 Kapur A, "Early class III occlusal tendency in children and its selective management" 26 : 107-113, 2008

16 Husson AH, "Dentoskeletal effects of the modified tandem appliance vs the facemask appliance in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion: a single-center, randomized controlled trial" 17 : 522-529, 2016

17 Chong YH, "Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion" 66 : 351-362, 1996

18 Chun YS, "A new appliance for orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion" 33 : 705-710, 1999

19 Carrière L, "A new Class II distalizer" 38 : 224-231, 2004

20 Seehra J, "A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusion" 82 : 96-101, 2012