RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Prosodic focus in Seoul Korean and South Kyungsang Korean

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104722184

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study employed production and perception experiments in an exploration of whether “purely” prosodic marking of focus is weak and ambiguous in Seoul Korean and South Kyungsang Korean. Production data presented two important characteristics in the use of prosodic focus in both languages. Prosodic modulation by focus was weak, and focus effects spread to the adjacent position within a phrase as a function of focus. As a result, listeners had difficulty identifying the position of prosodic focus in perception-overall identification rates were about 37% for Seoul Korean and about 48% for South Kyungsang Korean. Additionally, incorrect answers often appeared within the same phrase before or after focus positions. The results of this study suggest that prosodic marking of focus is neither automatic nor universal, which is in contrast to the common claim that a focused element is maximally prominent in a sentence (Büring 2010; Samek-Lodovici 2005; Truckenbrodt 1995). Instead, this study claims that prosodic marking of focus differs according to a language’s prosodic structure, and that it can be weak and ambiguous in certain languages.
    번역하기

    This study employed production and perception experiments in an exploration of whether “purely” prosodic marking of focus is weak and ambiguous in Seoul Korean and South Kyungsang Korean. Production data presented two important characteristics in ...

    This study employed production and perception experiments in an exploration of whether “purely” prosodic marking of focus is weak and ambiguous in Seoul Korean and South Kyungsang Korean. Production data presented two important characteristics in the use of prosodic focus in both languages. Prosodic modulation by focus was weak, and focus effects spread to the adjacent position within a phrase as a function of focus. As a result, listeners had difficulty identifying the position of prosodic focus in perception-overall identification rates were about 37% for Seoul Korean and about 48% for South Kyungsang Korean. Additionally, incorrect answers often appeared within the same phrase before or after focus positions. The results of this study suggest that prosodic marking of focus is neither automatic nor universal, which is in contrast to the common claim that a focused element is maximally prominent in a sentence (Büring 2010; Samek-Lodovici 2005; Truckenbrodt 1995). Instead, this study claims that prosodic marking of focus differs according to a language’s prosodic structure, and that it can be weak and ambiguous in certain languages.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Kuznetsova, Alexandra, "lmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (Lmer Objects of lme4 Package)"

    2 Selkirk, Elisabeth, "Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation" Springer 215-244, 2007

    3 Gordon, Matthew, "Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation" Springer 69-82, 2007

    4 Frota, Sónia, "The prosody of focus: A case-study with cross-linguistic implications" 319-322, 2002

    5 Jun, Sun-Ah, "The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody" The Ohio State University 1993

    6 Lee, Hyunjung, "The nominal pitch accent system of South Kyungsang Korean" 23 (23): 71-111, 2014

    7 Vallduví, Enric, "The informational component" University of Pennsylvania 1990

    8 조성혜, "The effect of the consonant-induced pitch on Seoul Korean intonation" 언어정보연구소 33 (33): 299-317, 2016

    9 Song, Jae Jung, "The Korean language: Structure, use and context" Routledge 2005

    10 Jun, Sun-Ah, "The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy" 15 : 189-226, 1998

    1 Kuznetsova, Alexandra, "lmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (Lmer Objects of lme4 Package)"

    2 Selkirk, Elisabeth, "Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation" Springer 215-244, 2007

    3 Gordon, Matthew, "Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation" Springer 69-82, 2007

    4 Frota, Sónia, "The prosody of focus: A case-study with cross-linguistic implications" 319-322, 2002

    5 Jun, Sun-Ah, "The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody" The Ohio State University 1993

    6 Lee, Hyunjung, "The nominal pitch accent system of South Kyungsang Korean" 23 (23): 71-111, 2014

    7 Vallduví, Enric, "The informational component" University of Pennsylvania 1990

    8 조성혜, "The effect of the consonant-induced pitch on Seoul Korean intonation" 언어정보연구소 33 (33): 299-317, 2016

    9 Song, Jae Jung, "The Korean language: Structure, use and context" Routledge 2005

    10 Jun, Sun-Ah, "The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy" 15 : 189-226, 1998

    11 Lee, Albert, "Revisiting focus prosody in Japanese" 274-277, 2012

    12 Xu, Yi, "ProsodyPro-A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis" 7-10, 2013

    13 Samek-Lodovici, Vieri, "Prosody-syntax interaction in the expression of focus" 23 (23): 687-755, 2005

    14 Fiedler, Ines, "Prosody of focus marking in Ewe" 34 (34): 1-46, 2013

    15 Oh, Mira, "Prosody and information structure: Phonetic realizations of focus and topic in Korean" 15 (15): 7-19, 2008

    16 Jun, Sun-Ah, "Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing" Oxford University Press 201-229, 2005

    17 Jun, Sun-Ah, "Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing" Oxford University Press 520-539, 2014

    18 Jun, Sun-Ah, "Prosodic markings of complex NP focus, syntax, and the pre-/post-focus string" Cascadilla 214-230, 2011

    19 Swerts, Marc, "Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: A comparative analysis" 30 (30): 629-654, 2002

    20 Baumann, Stefan, "Prosodic marking of focus domains-categorical or gradient" 301-304, 2006

    21 Lee, Yong-cheol, "Prosodic focus within and across languages" University of Pennsylvania 2015

    22 Lee, Yong-cheol, "Prosodic correlation between the focusing adverb ozik ‘only’ and focus/givenness in Korean" 2 (2): 85-111, 2012

    23 Jieun Kim, "Prosodic Structure and Focus Prosody of South Kyungsang Korean" 언어교육원 45 (45): 43-66, 2009

    24 Lee, Yong-cheol, "Production and perception of tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese" 7 (7): 1-13, 2016

    25 Dohen, Marion, "Pre-focal rephrasing, focal enhancement and post-focal deaccentuation in French" 1313-1316, 2004

    26 Truckenbrodt, Hubert, "Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence" Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1995

    27 Xu, Yi, "Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation" 33 (33): 159-197, 2005

    28 Lee, Yong-cheol, "Phonetic realization of contrastive focus in Korean" 100033 : 1-4, 2010

    29 Jun, Sun-Ah, "Phonetic and phonological markers of contrastive focus in Korean" 1295-1298, 1998

    30 Xu, Yi, "Organizing syllables into groups-evidence from F0 and duration patterns in Mandarin" 37 (37): 502-520, 2009

    31 이동명, "On the Pitch-Accent System of South Kyungsang Korean: A Phonological Perspective" 언어교육원 45 (45): 3-22, 2009

    32 Maskikit, Raechel, "No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: The case of Moluccan Malay" 33 (33): 353-389, 2016

    33 Jun, Sun-Ah, "Japanese/Korean Linguistics 14" CSLI 15-26, 2006

    34 Pierrehumbert, Janet, "Japanese tone structure" The MIT Press 1988

    35 Beckman, Mary, "Intonational structure in Japanese and English" 3 : 255-309, 1986

    36 Ladd, Donald R, "Intonation, accent and rhythm" Walter de Gruyter 253-266, 1984

    37 Halliday, Michael A. K., "Intonation and grammar in British English" Mouton 1967

    38 Büring, Daniel, "Information structure: Theoretical, typological, and experimental perspectives" Oxford University Press 177-205, 2010

    39 Lambrecht, Knud, "Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents" Cambridge University Press 1994

    40 Jun, Sun-Ah, "High-toned [il] in Korean: Phonetics, intonational phonology, and sound change" 51 : 93-108, 2015

    41 김미란, "Focus-driven prosodic restructuring patterns: A unified OT account of deaccenting and dephrasing" 한국음운론학회 21 (21): 25-56, 2015

    42 Kim, Jieun, "Focus realization: Not by focus-to-accent but prosodic structure" GLSA 2 : 1-14, 2009

    43 Downing, Laura, "Focus and prominence in Chichewa, Chitumbuka and Durban Zulu" 49 : 47-65, 2008

    44 Zerbian, Sabine, "Expression of information structure in the Bantu language Northern Sotho" Humboldt University 2006

    45 Xu, Yi, "Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours" 27 (27): 55-105, 1999

    46 Krifka, Manfred, "Basic notions of information structure" 55 (55): 243-276, 2008

    47 Cooper, William E., "Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts" 77 (77): 2142-2156, 1985

    48 R Core Team, "A language and environment for statistical computing"

    49 Lee, Yong-cheol, "A crosslinguistic study of prosodic focus" 4754-4758, 2015

    50 이용철, "(The)Phonetic realization of contrastive focus and its neighbors in Korean and English : a cross-language study" 한남대학교 대학원 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-09-18 학회명변경 영문명 : Center for the Study of Language and Information -> Institute for the Study of Language and Information KCI등재
    2010-05-17 학회명변경 한글명 : 언어연구소 -> 언어정보연구소
    영문명 : Center for the Study of Language -> Center for the Study of Language and Information
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-03-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Linguistic Research KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.42 0.42 0.45
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.4 0.43 1.123 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼