RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국가영어능력평가시험 2ㆍ3급 쓰기 문항유형별 어법상의 오류 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99797110

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study analyzed the errors in Korean high school students' responses to the four writing items of the National English Ability Test (NEAT) Levels 2 and 3. To two Level 2 items and two Level 3 items 1,119 responses were randomly selected and coded ...

      This study analyzed the errors in Korean high school students' responses to the four writing items of the National English Ability Test (NEAT) Levels 2 and 3. To two Level 2 items and two Level 3 items 1,119 responses were randomly selected and coded based on the error scheme that was developed for this study by adapting some previous studies. The result indicates that some types of errors were more frequently observed in the responses to certain types of questions of the NEAT. Errors in verb tense and aspect, for example, were more frequently observed in question number 1 of NEAT Level 2 and in question number 4 of NEAT Level 3, while article and preposition errors occurred more frequently in question number 3 of NEAT Level 3. Based on a careful investigation of the students' responses to each question, certain characteristics of each question seem to induce certain types of errors more than other types. Question number 1 of NEAT Level 2, for example, requires test takers to narrate or describe past events or experiences; this might cause more errors in the use of verb tense and aspect. The pedagogical implications of the findings are discussed in terms of teaching English writing to Korean students.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 연구목적
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 연구목적
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • 부록
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이은주, "한국 대학생 영어 학습자 코퍼스에 나타난 견지 부사구(Stance Adverbials)의 사용" 한국외국어교육학회 17 (17): 347-366, 2010

      2 문영인, "한국 대학 영작문에 나타나는 동료 수정의 성격" 55 (55): 119-140, 2000

      3 한국교육과정평가원, "서답형 문항 자동 채점 프로그램 도입 방안 연구(I)" 한국교육과정평가원 2006

      4 송미정, "문자 피드백의 유형과 영작문 실력 향상 간의 관계" 53 (53): 135-156, 1998

      5 한국교육과정평가원, "국가영어능력평가시험 쓰기 답안에 나타난 오류 및 연어분석" 한국교육과정평가원 2012

      6 Applebee, A. N., "Writing in the secondary school" National Council of Teachers of English 1981

      7 Gere, A. R., "Writing groups : History, theory, and implications" Southern Illinois University Press 1987

      8 McCurdy, P., "What students do with the composition feedback" 1992

      9 Ferris, D., "Treatment of error in second language student writing" The University of Michigan Press 2002

      10 Ferris, D., "The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?)" 13 : 49-62, 2004

      1 이은주, "한국 대학생 영어 학습자 코퍼스에 나타난 견지 부사구(Stance Adverbials)의 사용" 한국외국어교육학회 17 (17): 347-366, 2010

      2 문영인, "한국 대학 영작문에 나타나는 동료 수정의 성격" 55 (55): 119-140, 2000

      3 한국교육과정평가원, "서답형 문항 자동 채점 프로그램 도입 방안 연구(I)" 한국교육과정평가원 2006

      4 송미정, "문자 피드백의 유형과 영작문 실력 향상 간의 관계" 53 (53): 135-156, 1998

      5 한국교육과정평가원, "국가영어능력평가시험 쓰기 답안에 나타난 오류 및 연어분석" 한국교육과정평가원 2012

      6 Applebee, A. N., "Writing in the secondary school" National Council of Teachers of English 1981

      7 Gere, A. R., "Writing groups : History, theory, and implications" Southern Illinois University Press 1987

      8 McCurdy, P., "What students do with the composition feedback" 1992

      9 Ferris, D., "Treatment of error in second language student writing" The University of Michigan Press 2002

      10 Ferris, D., "The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?)" 13 : 49-62, 2004

      11 Bitchener, J., "The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students" 12 : 409-431, 2008

      12 Bitchener, J., "The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback" 63 : 204-211, 2009

      13 Hendrickson, J. M., "The treatment of error in written work, In Composing in a second language" Newbury House 145-159, 1984

      14 Mittan, R., "The peer review process: Harnessing students' communicative power, In Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students" Longman 207-219, 1989

      15 Stockwell, R., "The grammatical structures of English and Spanish" University of Chicago Press 1965

      16 Chandler, J., "The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing" 12 : 267-296, 2003

      17 Truscott, J., "The effect of error correction on learners’' ability to write accurately" 16 : 255-272, 2007

      18 Van Beuningen, C. G., "The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy" 156 : 279-296, 2008

      19 Bitchener, J., "The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing" 14 : 227-258, 2005

      20 Ferris, D., "The case of grammar correction in L2 writing classes : A response to Truscott(1996)" 8 : 1-11, 1999

      21 Truscott, J., "The case for"The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes" : A response to Ferris" 8 : 111-122, 1999

      22 Truscott, J., "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes" 46 : 327-369, 1996

      23 Ferris, D., "Students reactions to teacher response in multi-draft composition classroom" 29 (29): 33-53, 1995

      24 Truscott, J., "Selecting errors for selective error correction" 27 : 93-108, 2001

      25 Robb, T., "Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality" 20 : 83-95, 1986

      26 Zamel, V., "Responding to student writing" 19 : 75-101, 1985

      27 Lalande, J. F., "Reducing composition errors : An experiment" 66 : 140-149, 1982

      28 Mendonca, C. O., "Peer review negotiations : Revision activities in ESL writing instruction" 28 (28): 745-769, 1994

      29 Nelson, G. L., "Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?" 27 : 135-142, 1993

      30 Walker, J. L., "Opinions of university students about language teaching" 7 : 102-105, 1973

      31 Dulay, H., "Language two" Oxford University Press 1982

      32 Selinker, "Interlanguage" 10 : 201-231, 1972

      33 Mardijono, J. J., "Indonesian EFL advanced learners' grammatical errors" 5 (5): 67-90, 2003

      34 Polio, C., "If I only had more time : ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions" 7 : 43-68, 1998

      35 Lockhart, C., "How useful is peer response?" 5 (5): 17-29, 1993

      36 김지현, "Grammar Error Correction in L2 Writing: Effects, Types of Errors, and Types of Feedback" 한국외국어교육학회 17 (17): 1-30, 2010

      37 Cohen, A. D., "Feedback on composition: Teacher and student verbal reports, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom" Cambridge University Press 155-177, 1990

      38 Keh, C. L., "Feedback in the writing process : A model and methods for implementation" 44 (44): 294-304, 1990

      39 Van Beuningen, C. G., "Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing" 62 (62): 1-41, 2012

      40 Bitchener, J., "Evidence in support of written corrective feedback" 17 : 102-118, 2008

      41 Truscott, J., "Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction : A response to Chandler" 13 : 337-343, 2004

      42 Chaudron, C., "Evaluating writing: Effects of feedback on revision" 1983

      43 김성연, "Errors and Strategies Observed in Korean Heritage Learners' L2 Writing" 한국외국어교육학회 14 (14): 93-112, 2007

      44 Truscott, J., "Error correction, revision, and learning" 17 : 292-305, 2008

      45 Lennon, P., "Error : Some problems of definition, identification, and distance" 12 : 180-196, 1991

      46 Fitzgerald, J., "Enhancing two related thought processes : Revision in writing and critical reading" 43 : 42-48, 1989

      47 Semke, H. D., "Effects of the red pen" 17 : 195-202, 1984

      48 Nelson, G. L., "ESL students' perception of effectiveness in peer response groups" 7 (7): 113-131, 1998

      49 Radecki, P. M., "ESL student reactions to written comments on their written work" 16 (16): 355-363, 1988

      50 Ferris, D., "Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction, In Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues" Cambridge University Press 81-104, 2006

      51 Tsui, A. B. M., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?" 9 (9): 147-170, 2000

      52 Sheen, Y., "Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners" 37 : 556-569, 2009

      53 Leki, I., "Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom" Cambridge University Press 57-68, 1990

      54 Kepner, C. G., "An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills" 75 : 305-313, 1991

      55 Politzer, R., "An error analysis of the spoken English of Mexican-American pupils in a bilingual school and monolingual school" 23 (23): 39-61, 1973

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.74 0.74 0.74
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.76 0.74 1.149 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼