RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Assessment of Service Quality in Teaching Hospitals of Yazd University of Medical Sciences: Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105988935

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: Hospitals as integrated parts of the wide-ranging health care systems have dominant focus on health care provision to meet, maintain and promote people’s health needs of a community. This study aimed to assess the service quality of teac...

      Objectives: Hospitals as integrated parts of the wide-ranging health care systems have dominant focus on health care provision to meet, maintain and promote people’s health needs of a community. This study aimed to assess the service quality of teaching hospitals of Yazd University of Medical Sciences using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Methods: A literature review and a qualitative method were used to obtain experts’ viewpoints about the quality dimensions of hospital services to design a questionnaire. Then, using a self-made questionnaire, perceptions of 300 patients about the quality of delivered services were gathered. Finally, FAHP was applied to weigh each quality dimension and TOPSIS method to rank hospital wards. Results: Six dimensions including responsiveness, assurance, security, tangibles, health communication and Patient orientation were identified as affecting aspects of hospital services quality among which, security and tangibles got the highest and lowest importance respectively (0.25406, 0.06883). Findings also revealed that in hospital A, orthopedics and ophthalmology wards obtained the highest score in terms of quality while cardiology department got the lowest ranking (0.954, 0.323). In hospital B, the highest and the lowest ranking was belonged to cardiology and surgical wards (0.895, 0.00) while in hospital C, surgical units were rated higher than internal wards (0.959, 0.851).

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Triantaphyllou E, "Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges" 2 (2): 35-44, 1995

      2 Lai Y-J, "Topsis for MODM" 76 (76): 486-500, 1994

      3 Laroche M, "The service quality dimensions and patient satisfaction relationships in South Korea: comparisons across gender, age and types of service" 19 (19): 140-149, 2005

      4 Cheng L, "The evaluation and analysis on medical service quality of inpatient department of public & nonprofit hospital" 2005

      5 Buyukozkan G, "Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology" 38 (38): 9407-9424, 2011

      6 Andaleeb SS, "Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction:a study of hospitals in a developing country" 52 (52): 1359-1370, 2001

      7 Aghamolaei T, "Service quality assessment of a referral hospital in Southern Iran with SERVQUAL technique: patients’ perspective" 14 (14): 1-, 2014

      8 Haddad S, "Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit" 17 (17): 21-29, 2000

      9 Hwang CL, "Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications" Springer 12-19, 1981

      10 Wisniewski M, "Measuring service quality in a hospital colposcopy clinic" 18 (18): 217-228, 2005

      1 Triantaphyllou E, "Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges" 2 (2): 35-44, 1995

      2 Lai Y-J, "Topsis for MODM" 76 (76): 486-500, 1994

      3 Laroche M, "The service quality dimensions and patient satisfaction relationships in South Korea: comparisons across gender, age and types of service" 19 (19): 140-149, 2005

      4 Cheng L, "The evaluation and analysis on medical service quality of inpatient department of public & nonprofit hospital" 2005

      5 Buyukozkan G, "Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology" 38 (38): 9407-9424, 2011

      6 Andaleeb SS, "Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction:a study of hospitals in a developing country" 52 (52): 1359-1370, 2001

      7 Aghamolaei T, "Service quality assessment of a referral hospital in Southern Iran with SERVQUAL technique: patients’ perspective" 14 (14): 1-, 2014

      8 Haddad S, "Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit" 17 (17): 21-29, 2000

      9 Hwang CL, "Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications" Springer 12-19, 1981

      10 Wisniewski M, "Measuring service quality in a hospital colposcopy clinic" 18 (18): 217-228, 2005

      11 Narang R, "Measuring perceived quality of health care services in India" 23 (23): 171-186, 2010

      12 Volaric T, "FAHP and TOPSIS methods for the selection of appropriate multimedia application for learning and teaching" 8 (8): 224-232, 2014

      13 Chen C-T, "Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment" 114 (114): 1-9, 2000

      14 Wang Z-X, "Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method" 41 (41): 2824-2831, 2014

      15 Mikhailov L, "Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process" 5 (5): 23-33, 2004

      16 Juan X, "Evaluation of medical quality in clinical departments of a hospital by TOPSIS method and RSR method" 36 (36): 3269-3271, 2009

      17 Liu KF, "Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: a hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process" 36 (36): 5119-5136, 2009

      18 Zhang W, "Comprehensive evaluation on quality of hospital medical services by using TOPSIS method" 5 : 25-, 2007

      19 Siddiqui N, "Comparison of services of public, private and foreign hospitals from the perspective of Bangladeshi patients" 25 (25): 221-230, 2007

      20 Babakus E, "Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation" 26 (26): 767-, 1992

      21 Soyhan N, "A. Dimensioning the quality of health care services (Karabuk state hospital service quality dimensions as an example of measurement application)" 2 (2): 39-44, 2013

      22 Kahraman C, "A two phase multiattribute decision-making approach for new product introduction" 177 (177): 1567-1582, 2007

      23 Bhaskar NL, "A study on patient satisfaction through extemporaneous responses from patients in a tertiary care hospital" 5 (5): 319-, 2014

      24 Gronroos C, "A service quality model and its marketing implications" 18 (18): 36-44, 1984

      25 Hariharan S, "A new tool for measurement of process-based performance of multispecialty tertiary care hospitals" 17 (17): 2004

      26 Lee AH, "A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan" 34 (34): 96-107, 2008

      27 Buyukozkan G, "A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry" 39 (39): 2341-2354, 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-04-06 학술지명변경 한글명 : Osong Public Health and Research Persptectives -> Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives
      외국어명 : Osong Public Health and Research Persptectives -> Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives
      KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.03 0.03 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼