회장루의 합병증과 관련인자 분석 = Complication and Relevant Factors after an Ileostomy for Fecal Diversion in a Patient with Rectal Cancer

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The proportion of sphincter-saving operations for lower rectal cancer is increasing with improved surgical techniques
and additional concurrent preoperative chemo-radiation therapy. A defunctioning ileostomy or colostomy is performed after
a sphincter-saving operation in the belief that diverting the fecal stream will prevent anastomotic leakage. This study was
undertaken to assess all morbidity and combined problems associated with a temporary loop ileostomy.
Methods: A total of 167 patients who had undergone an ileostomy after a proctectomy between July 1997 and May 2007
were enrolled in this study. All patients were analyzed retrospectively, and the enrolled patients were registered in the Colorectal
Cancer Database and were followed prospectively. Three patients did not receive an ileostomy take-down operation because
of tumor recurrence.
Results: Complications of ileostomy formation developed in 20 (11.9%) cases. There were no significant relevant factors
influencing the complications of ileostomy formation. Complications related with ileostomy take-down developed in 33 (17.9%)
cases. Longer operation time, perioperative transfusion, and postoperative radiotherapy were statistically significant factors
related to the complications of ileostomy take-down (P=0.047, P=0.019, P=0.042). After ileostomy take-down, six patients
were identified with complications, such as a rectovaginal fistula or an anastomotic stenosis, related with rectal cancer surgery.
Conclusion: The useful ileostomy sometimes carries certain morbidity; therefore, an ileostomy should be performed selectively,
and the decision should be made with care. Also, a careful evaluation of the distal part of an ileostomy is necessary before
and after an ileostomy take-down.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The proportion of sphincter-saving operations for lower rectal cancer is increasing with improved surgical techniques
and additional concurrent preoperative chemo-radiation therapy. A defunctioning ileostomy or colostomy is performed after
a sphincter-saving operation in the belief that diverting the fecal stream will prevent anastomotic leakage. This study was
undertaken to assess all morbidity and combined problems associated with a temporary loop ileostomy.
Methods: A total of 167 patients who had undergone an ileostomy after a proctectomy between July 1997 and May 2007
were enrolled in this study. All patients were analyzed retrospectively, and the enrolled patients were registered in the Colorectal
Cancer Database and were followed prospectively. Three patients did not receive an ileostomy take-down operation because
of tumor recurrence.
Results: Complications of ileostomy formation developed in 20 (11.9%) cases. There were no significant relevant factors
influencing the complications of ileostomy formation. Complications related with ileostomy take-down developed in 33 (17.9%)
cases. Longer operation time, perioperative transfusion, and postoperative radiotherapy were statistically significant factors
related to the complications of ileostomy take-down (P=0.047, P=0.019, P=0.042). After ileostomy take-down, six patients
were identified with complications, such as a rectovaginal fistula or an anastomotic stenosis, related with rectal cancer surgery.
Conclusion: The useful ileostomy sometimes carries certain morbidity; therefore, an ileostomy should be performed selectively,
and the decision should be made with care. Also, a careful evaluation of the distal part of an ileostomy is necessary before
and after an ileostomy take-down.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Fu_rst A, "coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study" 46 : 1161-1166, 2003

2 van de Pavoordt HD, "The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases" 2 : 214-217, 1987

3 Heald RJ, "The mesorectum in rectal cancersurgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?" 69 : 613-616, 1982

4 Hosie KB, "Temporary loop ileostomy following restorative proctocolectomy" 79 : 33-34, 1992

5 Metcalf AM, "Temporary ileostomy for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Function and complications" 29 : 300-303, 1986

6 Phang PT, "Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown" 177 : 463-466, 1999

7 Babcock G, "Technical complications of ileostomy" 73 : 329-331, 1980

8 Edwards DP, "Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial" 88 : 360-363, 2001

9 Park JJ, "Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience" 42 : 1575-1580, 1999

10 Steffen T, "Safety and morbidity after ultra-low coloanal anastomoses: J-pouch vs end-to-end reconstruction" 23 : 277-281, 2008

11 Enker WE, "Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service" 230 : 544-552, 1999

12 Parks AG, "Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma" 69 : 301-304, 1982

13 Smedh K, "Reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer following the introduction of a colorectal unit" 88 : 273-277, 2001

14 Hallbo_o_k O, "Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection" 224 : 58-65, 1996

15 Heriot AG, "Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection" 93 : 19-32, 2006

16 Todd IP, "Mechanical complications of ileostomy" 11 : 268-273, 1982

17 Rullier E, "Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery" 25 : 274-277, 2001

18 Wexner SD, "Loop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion" 36 : 349-354, 1993

19 Khoo RE, "Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion" 167 : 519-522, 1994

20 Winslet MC, "Loop ileostomy after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis--is it necessary?" 34 : 267-270, 1991

21 Leong AP, "Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy" 81 : 727-729, 1994

22 Dehni N, "Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis" 85 : 1114-1117, 1998

23 Turnbull RB Jr, "Ileostomy technics and indications for surgery" 23 : 310-314, 1966

24 Al-Homoud S, "Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models" 13 : 83-92, 2004

25 Feinberg SM, "Complications of loop ileostomy" 153 : 102-107, 1987

26 Law WL, "Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients" 240 : 260-268, 2004

27 Luna-Pe@rez P, "Anal sphincter preservation in locally advanced low rectal adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis" 82 : 3-9, 2003

28 Pakkastie TE, "A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses" 163 : 929-933, 1997

29 Huh JW, "A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer" 50 : 1040-1046, 2007

30 Wong NY, "A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study" 48 : 2076-2079, 2005