The Reliability of the Transconjunctival Approach for Orbital Exposure: Measurement of Positional Changes in the Lower Eyelid

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background: Lower eyelid incisions are widely used for the orbital approach in periorbital trauma and aesthetic surgery. In general, the subciliary approach is known to cause disposition of the lower eyelid by scarring the anterior lamella in some cases. On the other hand, many surgeons believe that a transconjunctival approach usually does not result in such complications and is a reliable method. We measured positional changes in the lower eyelid in blowout fracture repair since entropion is one of the most serious complications of the transconjunctival orbital approach.
Methods: To measure the positional changes in the lower eyelids, we analyzed preoperative and postoperative photographs over various time intervals. In the analysis of the photographs, marginal reflex distance 2 (MRD2) and eyelash angle were used as an index of eyelid position. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the significance in the positional changes. All patients underwent orbital reconstruction through a transconjunctival incision by a single plastic surgeon.
Results: In 42 blowout fracture patients, there was no statistical significant difference in the MRD2 and eyelash angle. Furthermore, there were no clinical complications, such as infection, hematoma, bleeding, or implant protrusion, during the follow-up periods.
Conclusion: The advantages of the transconjunctival approach for orbital access include minimal scarring and a lower risk of eyelid displacement compared with other approaches.
Based on these results, we recommend the transconjunctival approach for orbital exposure as a safe and reliable method.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Wong JW, "Wound healing in oral mucosa results in reduced scar formation as compared with skin: evidence from the red Duroc pig model and humans" 17 : 717-729, 2009

2 Baumann A, "Use of the preseptal transconjunctival approach in orbit reconstruction surgery" 59 : 287-291, 2001

3 Appling WD, "Transconjunctival approach vs subciliary skin-muscle flap approach for orbital fracture repair" 119 : 1000-1007, 1993

4 Novelli G, "Transconjunctival approach in orbital traumatology : a review of 56 cases" 39 : 266-270, 2011

5 Korchia D, "Transconjunctival approach in lower eyelid blepharoplasty" 11 : 166-170, 2003

6 Segal KL, "The effect of transconjunctival blepharoplasty on margin reflex distance 2" 40 : 13-18, 2016

7 Ho VH, "Sutureless transconjunctival repair of orbital blowout fractures" 20 : 458-460, 2004

8 Zhou L, "Proteomic analysis of human tears: defensin expression after ocular surface surgery" 3 : 410-416, 2004

9 Lorenz HP, "Primary and secondary orbit surgery: the transconjunctival approach" 103 : 1124-1128, 1999

10 Westfall CT, "Operative complications of the transconjunctival inferior fornix approach" 98 : 1525-1528, 1991

11 Taban M, "Lower eyelid position after transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty with versus without a skin pinch" 24 : 7-9, 2008

12 Zarem HA, "Expanded applications for transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty" 88 : 215-220, 1991

13 Kim YK, "Evaluation of subciliary incision used in blowout fracture treatment: pretarsal flattening after lower eyelid surgery" 125 : 1479-1484, 2010

14 Szpaderska AM, "Differential injury responses in oral mucosal and cutaneous wounds" 82 : 621-626, 2003

15 Li J, "Defensins HNP1 and HBD2 stimulation of wound-associated responses in human conjunctival fibroblasts" 47 : 3811-3819, 2006

16 Mullins JB, "Complications of the transconjunctival approach: a review of 400 cases" 123 : 385-388, 1997

17 Lai Y, "AMPed up immunity: how antimicrobial peptides have multiple roles in immune defense" 30 : 131-141, 2009