RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Comparing the Arrangements of Governance and Sustainable Development in OECD Countries: Coupled or Decoupled?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106173542

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study attempts to analyze to what extent governance and sustainable development (SD) empirically appear compatible in the thirtyfive OECD countries through the fuzzy-set ideal type analysis, and identify which ideal types appear coupled or decoup...

      This study attempts to analyze to what extent governance and sustainable development (SD) empirically appear compatible in the thirtyfive OECD countries through the fuzzy-set ideal type analysis, and identify which ideal types appear coupled or decoupled, and then reveal which countries belong to the coupled types or to the decoupled types. In short, twenty-two countries (including Sweden (fuzzy score, 0.953), Denmark (0.920), Finland (0.914), Norway (0.911) in Type 1 (G*S, ‘strong G-S coupled countries’); and Turkey (0.906), Greece (0.833), Mexico (0.828) in Type 4 (g*s, ‘lite g-s coupled countries’) are in line with the accepted conventions regarding the compatible relationship between governance and SD. On the other hand, the rest of thirteen countries (including USA (fuzzy score, 0.815), Luxembourg (0.721), Australia (0.660) in Type 2 (G*s, ‘G-s decoupled countries’); and Slovenia (0.728), France (0.644), Czech Rep. (0.625) in Type 3 (g*S, ‘g-S decoupled countries’) may indicate that the relationship of governance and SD is in fact experiencing tensions in the national contexts. These findings are characterized by the substance (of SD) and procedure (of governance) divide. Considering the results, this study focuses on the idea of reflexivity or reflexive capacity.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최영준, "사회과학에서 퍼지셋 활용의 모색: 퍼지 이상형 분석과 결합 요인 분석을 중심으로" 정부학연구소 15 (15): 307-336, 2009

      2 양재진, "복지국가의 저발전에 관한 실증 연구: 제도주의적 신권력자원론의 타당성 검토" 한국정치학회 46 (46): 79-97, 2012

      3 이도형, "발전행정론의재구성을위한시론:현대 발전이론의 이론적 시사점과 발전전략적 함의를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 36 (36): 43-63, 2002

      4 Jung, G. H, "What is green governance" 31 : 23-37, 2002

      5 Kvist, J, "Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s : Using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types" 9 (9): 231-252, 1999

      6 Glasbergen, P, "Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically:The ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool" 21 (21): 1-13, 2010

      7 Rhodes, R. A. W, "Understanding governance: Ten years on" 28 (28): 1243-1264, 2007

      8 Benn S, "Towards new forms of governance for issues of sustainability:Renewing relationships between corporates, government, and community" 9 (9): 1-9, 2005

      9 허태욱, "Towards Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development" 서울대학교행정대학원 25 (25): 1-22, 2010

      10 Bambra, C, "The worlds of welfare: Illusory and gender blind" 3 (3): 201-211, 2004

      1 최영준, "사회과학에서 퍼지셋 활용의 모색: 퍼지 이상형 분석과 결합 요인 분석을 중심으로" 정부학연구소 15 (15): 307-336, 2009

      2 양재진, "복지국가의 저발전에 관한 실증 연구: 제도주의적 신권력자원론의 타당성 검토" 한국정치학회 46 (46): 79-97, 2012

      3 이도형, "발전행정론의재구성을위한시론:현대 발전이론의 이론적 시사점과 발전전략적 함의를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 36 (36): 43-63, 2002

      4 Jung, G. H, "What is green governance" 31 : 23-37, 2002

      5 Kvist, J, "Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s : Using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types" 9 (9): 231-252, 1999

      6 Glasbergen, P, "Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically:The ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool" 21 (21): 1-13, 2010

      7 Rhodes, R. A. W, "Understanding governance: Ten years on" 28 (28): 1243-1264, 2007

      8 Benn S, "Towards new forms of governance for issues of sustainability:Renewing relationships between corporates, government, and community" 9 (9): 1-9, 2005

      9 허태욱, "Towards Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development" 서울대학교행정대학원 25 (25): 1-22, 2010

      10 Bambra, C, "The worlds of welfare: Illusory and gender blind" 3 (3): 201-211, 2004

      11 Voß, J. -P, "The politics of reflexive governance : Challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management" 16 (16): 9-, 2011

      12 Jessop, B, "The new politics of local governance in Britain" Oxford University Press 11-32, 2000

      13 Jordan, A, "The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards" 26 (26): 17-33, 2008

      14 Bell, S, "Sustainable development indicators: The tyranny of methodology revisited" 6 (6): 222-239, 2011

      15 Hezri, A, "Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics" 60 (60): 86-99, 2006

      16 Waas, T, "Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development" 6 (6): 5512-5534, 2014

      17 Robinson, J, "Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development" 48 (48): 369-384, 2004

      18 Bertelsmann Stiftung, "SGI 2017 Scores" Bertelsmann Stiftung 2017

      19 Sachs, J, "SDG Index and dashboards report 2017: Global responsibilities" Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network 2017

      20 Pierre, J, "Reinventing governance" 37 (37): 591-609, 2009

      21 Voß, J. -P, "Reflexive governance for sustainable development" Edward Elgar 2006

      22 Ragin, C. C, "Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond" University of Chicago Press 2008

      23 Rihoux, B, "Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research" 21 (21): 679-706, 2006

      24 Rawls, J, "Political liberalism" Columbia University Press 1993

      25 Bertelsmann Stiftung, "Policy performance and governance capacities in the OECD and EU: Sustainable governance indicators 2017" Bertelsmann Stiftung 2017

      26 Hyden, G, "Operationalizing governance for sustainable development" 17 (17): 13-31, 2001

      27 석재은, "OECD 복지국가 지속가능성의 다차원적 평가와 지속가능 유형별 복지정책의 특성" 한국보건사회연구원 34 (34): 5-35, 2014

      28 Sørensen, E, "Network governance and post-liberal democracy" 27 (27): 197-237, 2005

      29 Li, G, "Multi-attribute decision making with generalized fuzzy numbers" 66 (66): 1793-1803, 2015

      30 Treib O, "Modes of governance : A note towards conceptual clarification" 14 (14): 1-20, 2005

      31 Dodson, M, "Mining, minerals and sustainable development" 2002

      32 Lafferty, W. M, "Implementing Sustainable Development" Oxford University 2000

      33 Goodin, R. E, "Green political theory" Polity 1992

      34 Dean, M, "Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society" Sage 1999

      35 Tosun, J, "Governing the interlinkages between the sustainable development goals : Approaches to attain policy integration" 1 (1): 1700036-, 2017

      36 Weale, A, "Governing sustainability" Cambridge University Press 2009

      37 Kooiman, J, "Governing as governance" Sage 2003

      38 Bleischwitz, R, "Governance of sustainable development: Co-evolution of corporate and political strategies" 7 (7): 27-43, 2004

      39 Lafferty, W. M, "Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function" Edward Elgar 2004

      40 Dodson, M, "Governance for sustainable development: Strategic issues and principles for Indigenous Australian communities" Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research 2003

      41 Zeijl‐Rozema, A, "Governance for sustainable development: A framework" 16 (16): 410-421, 2008

      42 UNDESA, "Governance and development: Thematic think piece" UN System Task Team on the post-2015 UN Development Agenda 2012

      43 Stojanović, I, "Good governance as a tool of sustainable development" 5 (5): 558-557, 2016

      44 Gough, I, "Globalization and regional welfare regimes: The East Asian case" 1 (1): 163-189, 2001

      45 Katz, H, "Global Civil Society 2006/7" SAGE 2006

      46 Ragin, C. C, "Fuzzy-set social science" University of Chicago Press 2000

      47 Kvist, J, "Fuzzy set ideal type analysis" 60 (60): 474-481, 2007

      48 Farrell, K. N, "From *for*to governance for sustainable development in Europe: What is at stake for further research" 8 (8): 127-150, 2005

      49 Hass, P. M, "Emerging forces in environmental governance" United Nations University Press 2004

      50 Scharpf, F, "Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries" Princeton University Press 2000

      51 Barnes, M, "Designing citizen-centred governance" Joseph Rowntree Foundation 2008

      52 Ragin, C. C, "Democratization and political culture in comparative perspective: Festschrift für Dirk Berg-Schlosser" Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2005

      53 March, J. G, "Democratic governance" Free Press 1995

      54 Sharma, S. D, "Democracy, good governance, and economic development" 3 (3): 29-62, 2007

      55 Doherty, B, "Democracy and green political thought" Routledge 1996

      56 Bell, S, "Delivering sustainability therapy in sustainable development projects" 75 (75): 37-51, 2005

      57 Dryzek, J, "Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations" Oxford University Press 2000

      58 Kooiman, J, "Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy" Oxford University Press 2000

      59 Klijn, E. H, "Complexity in governance network theory" 1 (1): 61-70, 2014

      60 Schneider, C. Q, "Case studies nested in fuzzy-set QCA on sufficiency:Formalizing case selection and causal inference" 45 (45): 526-568, 2016

      61 Boström, M, "A reflexive look at reflexivity in environmental sociology" 3 (3): 6-16, 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-03-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korean Journal of Policy Studies -> Journal of Policy Studies
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Policy Studies -> Journal of Policy Studies
      KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-03-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 정책논총 -> The Korean Journal of Policy Studies KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-07-07 학술지등록 한글명 : 정책논총
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Policy Studies
      KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.16 0.16 0.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.16 0.17 0.35 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼