Tomato Yield Effects of Reciprocal Hybridization of Solanum lycopersicum Cultivars M82 and Micro-Tom

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Plant breeders have accumulated hybrid effects to increase food production in order to counteract the loss of arable land.
Hybrids may possess novel genetic potential to increase agricultural productivity; however, the relationships between genetic resources for optimizing crop productivity remain mostly unclear. In this study, we recorded heterosis effects of genetically inherited traits by reciprocal hybridization of the Solanum lycopersicum cultivar Micro-Tom and the commercial cultivar M82, which are currently available as in silico mutant populations, to identify mutant genes which can induce heterosis. The genetic variations between M82 and Micro-Tom caused intermediate phenotypic effects with regard to flowering time, plant height, and fruit size, indicating additive interactions among variations with a hybrid background. The total yield of F1 hybrid was similar to that of cultivar M82, regardless of reduced vegetative biomass, and it revealed an overdominance effect regarding number of harvested fruits. The inheritance of the phenotypes was similar among reciprocal F1 hybrids with different paternal and maternal materials. Based on the consistency of hybrids and wild types, Micro-Tom mutants showing floral homeotic defects and large plant size can be efficiently screened for overdominant yield mutants in F1 hybrids. Therefore, we suggest that identical traits in reciprocal hybrids between Micro-Tom and M82 varieties are useful as control F1 hybrids to improve field tomato productivity by screening mutant hybrids of Micro-Tom mutants and commercial variety M82.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 United Nations, "World Population Prospects 2019, Department of Economic and Social Affairs"

2 Fu D, "What is crop heterosis: new insights into an old topic" 56 (56): 1-13, 2014

3 Soyk S, "Variation in the flowering gene SELF PRUNING 5G promotes day-neutrality and early yield in tomato" 49 (49): 162-168, 2017

4 Silva GFF, "Tomato floral induction and flower development are orchestrated by the interplay between gibberellin and two unrelated microRNAcontrolled modules" 221 (221): 1328-1344, 2019

5 Jiang K, "Tomato Yield Heterosis Is Triggered by a Dosage Sensitivity of the Florigen Pathway That Fine-Tunes Shoot Architecture" 9 (9): e1004043-, 2013

6 Krieger U, "The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato" 42 (42): 459-463, 2010

7 Bruce AB, "The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor" 32 (32): 627-628, 1910

8 Saito T, "TOMATOMA : A novel tomato mutant database distributing micro-tom mutant collections" 52 (52): 283-296, 2011

9 Kalsy HS, "Study of cytoplasmic effects in reciprocal crosses of divergent varieties of maize(Zea mays L. )" 21 (21): 527-533, 1972

10 박순주 ; 이영경 ; 강민성 ; 배종향, "Revisiting Domestication to Revitalize Crop Improvement: The Florigen Revolution" 한국육종학회 4 (4): 387-397, 2016

11 Roudier P, "Projections of future floods and hydrological droughts in Europe under a +2°C global warming" 135 (135): 341-355, 2016

12 Burgess DJ, "Plant genetics: Branching out for crop improvement" 18 (18): 393-, 2017

13 Shikata M, "Plant Signal Transduction" Humana Press Inc 47-55, 2016

14 Semel Y, "Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato" 103 (103): 12981-12986, 2006

15 Park SJ, "Optimization of crop productivity in tomato using induced mutations in the florigen pathway" 46 (46): 1337-1342, 2014

16 Rajendran S, "Optimization of Tomato Productivity Using Flowering Time Variants" 11 (11): 285-, 2021

17 Parant A, "Les perspectives demographiques mondiales" 141 : 49-78, 1990

18 Yu SB, "Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid" 94 (94): 9226-9231, 1997

19 East EM, "Heterosis" 21 (21): 375-, 1936

20 Martí E, "Genetic and physiological characterization of tomato cv. Micro-Tom" 57 (57): 2037-2047, 2006

21 Henry Y, "Genetic analysis of in vitro plant tissue culture responses and regeneration capacities" 79 (79): 45-58, 1994

22 Lewis D, "Gene interaction, environment and hybrid vigour" 144 (144): 178-185, 1955

23 Eshed Y, "Florigen and anti-florigen – A systemic mechanism for coordinating growth and termination in flowering plants" 5 : 465-, 2014

24 Watanabe S, "Ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS)mutagenesis of Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom for large-scale mutant screens" 24 (24): 33-38, 2007

25 Soyk S, "Duplication of a domestication locus neutralized a cryptic variant that caused a breeding barrier in tomato" 5 (5): 471-479, 2019

26 Li L, "Dominance, overdominance and epistasis condition the heterosis in two heterotic rice hybrids" 180 (180): 1725-1742, 2008

27 Jones DF, "Dominance of Linked Factors as a Means of Accounting for Heterosis" 2 (2): 466-, 1917

28 Xiao J, "Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers" 140 (140): 745-754, 1995

29 Soyk S, "Bypassing Negative Epistasis on Yield in Tomato Imposed by a Domestication Gene" 169 (169): 1142-1155, 2017

30 Muhammad A, "Breeding for Saline-resistant Varieties of Rice : III. Response of F1 Hybrids to Salinity in Reciprocal Crosses between Jhona 349 and Magnolia" 25 (25): 215-220, 1975

31 Smith RJ, "A Scoping Review of Urban Agriculture: Trends, Current Issues, and Future Research" American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 1-, 2018