RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인공와우를 통한 말지각과 반대편 귀 사용 효과에 대한 최근 연구 고찰 = Speech Perception and Benefits from the Contralateral Device of Cochlear Implant Users: A Review of Recent Literature

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104029317

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The goal of cochlear implants restores functional hearing by transmitting electrical pulses to auditory nerves and improves speech perception. Although current cochlear implant users showed greatly improved sentence recognition scores in a quiet envir...

      The goal of cochlear implants restores functional hearing by transmitting electrical pulses to auditory nerves and improves speech perception. Although current cochlear implant users showed greatly improved sentence recognition scores in a quiet environment, the issues of understanding speech in a noisy environment and listening to music are still challenging for them. Limitations of spectral and temporal resolution are thought to be related to these difficulties of cochlear implant users. As one of the approaches to resolve these challenging issues, benefits from the contralateral device of cochlear implant users were introduced. Two different types of binaural placements, bilateral and bimodal hearing, were continuously increased and they demonstrated some amounts of speech perception benefits. Bilateral hearing improves sound localization and speech perception in noise mostly due to the benefits from head shadow and redundancy effects. On the other hand, bimodal benefits are delivered by using acoustic low frequency information which is not represented in electric stimulation via cochlear implants. A review of the literature related to these topics was addressed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Donaldson, G. S., "Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: Speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity" 32 (32): 238-250, 2011

      2 Fitzpatrick, E. M., "Users’ experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid" 48 (48): 172-182, 2009

      3 Wilson, B. S., "Two new directions in speech processor design for cochlear implants" 26 (26): 73S-81S, 2005

      4 Dorman, M. F., "The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies" 13 (13): 105-112, 2008

      5 Kong, Y. Y., "Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants" 127 (127): 3114-3123, 2010

      6 Rosen, S., "Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects" 336 (336): 367-373, 1992

      7 Shannon, R. V., "Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues" 270 (270): 303-304, 1995

      8 Gifford, R. H., "Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs" 13 (13): 193-205, 2008

      9 Turner, C. W., "Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing" 115 (115): 1729-1735, 2004

      10 Friesen, L. M., "Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants" 110 : 1150-1163, 2001

      1 Donaldson, G. S., "Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: Speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity" 32 (32): 238-250, 2011

      2 Fitzpatrick, E. M., "Users’ experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid" 48 (48): 172-182, 2009

      3 Wilson, B. S., "Two new directions in speech processor design for cochlear implants" 26 (26): 73S-81S, 2005

      4 Dorman, M. F., "The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies" 13 (13): 105-112, 2008

      5 Kong, Y. Y., "Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants" 127 (127): 3114-3123, 2010

      6 Rosen, S., "Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects" 336 (336): 367-373, 1992

      7 Shannon, R. V., "Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues" 270 (270): 303-304, 1995

      8 Gifford, R. H., "Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs" 13 (13): 193-205, 2008

      9 Turner, C. W., "Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing" 115 (115): 1729-1735, 2004

      10 Friesen, L. M., "Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants" 110 : 1150-1163, 2001

      11 Mok, M., "Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears" 49 (49): 338-351, 2006

      12 Kong, Y. Y., "Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing" 117 (117): 1351-1361, 2005

      13 Green, T., "Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants" 112 : 2155-2164, 2002

      14 Firszt, J. B., "Restoring hearing symmetry with two cochlear implants or one cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid" 45 (45): 749-767, 2008

      15 Burns, E. M., "Played-again SAM; Further observations on the pitch of amplitude -modulated noise" 70 : 1655-1660, 1981

      16 Spahr, A. J., "Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: Effects of input dynamic range" 28 (28): 260-275, 2007

      17 Kong, Y. Y., "Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing" 25 (25): 173-185, 2004

      18 Gfeller, K. E., "Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing" 11 (11): 12-15, 2006

      19 Zhang, T., "Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation" 31 (31): 63-69, 2010

      20 Carroll, J., "Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing" 130 (130): 2054-2062, 2011

      21 Gifford, R. H., "Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy" 31 (31): 186-194, 2010

      22 von Ilberg, C. A., "Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: A review of the first decade" 16 (16): 1-30, 2011

      23 Srinivasan, A. G., "Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation" 270 (270): 89-100, 2010

      24 Kong, Y. Y., "Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing" 54 (54): 959-980, 2011

      25 Dorman, M. F., "Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition" 49 (49): 912-919, 2010

      26 Moore, B. C., "Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants" 24 (24): 243-254, 2003

      27 Wilson, B. S., "Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and brilliant future" 242 (242): 3-21, 2008

      28 Muller, J., "Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users" 74 (74): 185-198, 2012

      29 Yoon, Y. S., "Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners" 33 (33): 1161-1168, 2012

      30 Smith, Z. M., "Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception" 416 (416): 87-90, 2002

      31 Ching, T. Y., "Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: A review" 11 (11): 161-192, 2007

      32 Gorden, K. A., "Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants" 30 (30): 319-331, 2009

      33 McDermott, H., "Benefits of combined acoustic and electric hearing for music and pitch perception" 32 (32): 103-114, 2011

      34 Dunn, C. C., "Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant" 48 (48): 668-680, 2005

      35 Donaldson, G. S., "BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users" 30 : 401-410, 2009

      36 Gfeller, K., "Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise" 28 (28): 412-423, 2007

      37 Li, N., "A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing" 123 (123): 2287-2294, 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-28 학술지명변경 한글명 : 청능재활 -> Audiology and Speech Research
      외국어명 : Audiology -> Audiology and Speech Research
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2007-03-08 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국청각학회 -> 한국청각언어재활학회
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.58
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.47 0.43 0.607 0.44
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼