RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고려시대 현령(縣令)과 현위(縣尉)의 임명과 운영의 변화 = Appointments of Hyeon’ryeong(縣令) and Hyeon’wi(縣尉) personnel in Goryeo, and changes that occurred later on

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108194464

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Hyeon’ryeong(縣令) and Hyeon’wi(縣尉) personnel were assigned to local units that were designated as Hyeon(縣), and not to other units like Ju(州), Bu(府) and Gun(郡). They served a crucial function of their own in the Goryeo local adminis...

      Hyeon’ryeong(縣令) and Hyeon’wi(縣尉) personnel were assigned to local units that were designated as Hyeon(縣), and not to other units like Ju(州), Bu(府) and Gun(郡). They served a crucial function of their own in the Goryeo local administration. The Hyeon’ryeong prefects held the rank of 7-pum, alongside other Hyeon officials such as Sarok Chamgunsa(司錄參軍事) and Jangseogi(掌書記, both manned by personnel on their first ever governmental assignments), while the Hyeon’wi officers held the rank of 8-pum. All these posts were also considered as assignments given to officials who recently entered the government for the first time. It means these posts were these officials’ first ever post, and also the “first ever local post(‘Chosa We’gwan-jik, 初仕外官職’)’ they got. But there are certain questions that come to mind. If Hyeon’ryeong and Hyeon’wi were both indeed Chosa We’gwan-jik posts, the order of rank between them would have become another issue. And there seems to have been changes in the nature of both these posts.
      First of all, Hyeon’wi posts were provided as Chosa We’gwan-jik to personnel who entered the government for the first time, either after passing a civil exam or through the Eumseo(蔭敍) route. But during the Goryeo period’s latter half, when dynastic affairs were under interferences of the Mongol Yuan (元) Empire, Hyeon’wi posts were abolished, and to the local Hyeon units only the Hyeon’ryeong prefects were assigned. To the Hyeon’ryeong post, unlike Hyeon’wi, officials who had already served their Chosa We’gwan-jik posts -or even Gweonmu posts- were assigned. We can see there was a clear difference between the ones assigned as Hyeon’ryeong and the ones assigned as Hyeon’wi, in terms of their experience and their overall career. And the Hyeon’ryeong prefects clearly outranked other Chosa We’gwan-jik figures, like the aforementioned Sarok Chamgunsa and Jangseogi.
      During the period of Yuan interference, Hyeon’ryeong prefects served as sole leaders of the local Hyeon units. But there were some changes made to their status, and how they operated. Newcomers to the government preferred staying in the capital to being forced to report to local assignments, while the Pan’gwan(判官) officers in Ju(州), Bu(府), Gun(郡) units were abolished (just like the Hyeon’wi officers in Hyeon units), and the number of Sok-hyeon(屬縣, Hyeon units without prefects) units continued to diminish, as they were turned into ‘real’ Hyeon units (with prefects).
      In the ending days of Goryeo, alongside the Gammu(監務) system, the Hyeon’ryeong prefects were targeted in local reform discussions. In retrospect, amongst other local posts, Hyeon’ryeong was the one that went through the most changes.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼