RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고대영어동사의 위치와 도출구조 = Verb Position and Clause Structure of Old English.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75254257

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper concerns about how Old English constructions are derived from definitions such as LCA, specificity and C-features(V2) in the minimalist framework (Chomsky 2005, 2006). There are 5 sentence patterns in Old English, which makes it difficult to set up the basic clause structure. Having presented arguments against the existing analyses such as the OV approach or the VO approach or the head parameter approach, this paper argues, on a variety of grounds, that 5 sentence patterns in Old English are actually derived from the interaction of minimalist definitions such as LCA, Specificity and C-features. Assuming Old English clause structure to be a single VP structure like [VP V ...] and modal verbs and main verbs in Old English to be occupied in the same V-position, I show that 5 construction patterns in Old English are the results from the interactions of LCA(which makes modal verbs or main verbs move out of VP), V's specificity(which makes pronouns (object) raise to VP Spec) and C-features (which make objects to move to CP Spec). (Young San University)
      번역하기

      This paper concerns about how Old English constructions are derived from definitions such as LCA, specificity and C-features(V2) in the minimalist framework (Chomsky 2005, 2006). There are 5 sentence patterns in Old English, which makes it difficult t...

      This paper concerns about how Old English constructions are derived from definitions such as LCA, specificity and C-features(V2) in the minimalist framework (Chomsky 2005, 2006). There are 5 sentence patterns in Old English, which makes it difficult to set up the basic clause structure. Having presented arguments against the existing analyses such as the OV approach or the VO approach or the head parameter approach, this paper argues, on a variety of grounds, that 5 sentence patterns in Old English are actually derived from the interaction of minimalist definitions such as LCA, Specificity and C-features. Assuming Old English clause structure to be a single VP structure like [VP V ...] and modal verbs and main verbs in Old English to be occupied in the same V-position, I show that 5 construction patterns in Old English are the results from the interactions of LCA(which makes modal verbs or main verbs move out of VP), V's specificity(which makes pronouns (object) raise to VP Spec) and C-features (which make objects to move to CP Spec). (Young San University)

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 고대영어의 기본어순
      • 2.1 어순
      • 2.2 OV핵매개변인의 입장
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 고대영어의 기본어순
      • 2.1 어순
      • 2.2 OV핵매개변인의 입장
      • 2.3 OV에서의 도출
      • 3. VO어순분석
      • 3.1 Roberts (1997), Nunes (2002)
      • 3.2 Roberts (1997) 분석의 문제점들
      • 3.3 Nunes (2002), Pintzuk (1999, 2002)
      • 4. LCA 방법
      • 4.1 TP의 존재
      • 4.2 고대영어의 도출구조
      • 4.3 고대영어구문의 도출
      • 5. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이필환, "영어통시통사론" 한국문화사 1999

      2 김대익, "고대영어의 표면도출" 24 : 625-646, 2001

      3 ?anale,M., "Word Order Changer in Old English:Base Reanalysis in Generative Grammar" McGuil University 1978

      4 Roberts,Ian, "Verbs and Diachronic Syntax:a Comparative History of English and French" Kluwer 1993

      5 Lasnik,Howard, "Verbal Morphology:Syntactic Structures Meets the Minimalist Program" University of Connecticut 1994

      6 Pintzuk, Susan, "Verb-Object Order in Old English: Variation as Grammatical Competition, Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change" Oxford University Press 276-299, 2002

      7 Kroch,Anthony, "Verb-Object Order in Early Middle English, Diachronic Syntax: Model and Mechanism" Oxford University Press 2000

      8 Pintzuk, Susan, "Verb Seconding in Old English: Verb Movement to INFL" 10 : 5-35, 1993

      9 Pollock,Jean, "Verb Movement,UG and the Structure of IP" 20 : 365-424, 1989

      10 Lightfoot,David, "Verb Movement" Cambridge University Press 1994

      1 이필환, "영어통시통사론" 한국문화사 1999

      2 김대익, "고대영어의 표면도출" 24 : 625-646, 2001

      3 ?anale,M., "Word Order Changer in Old English:Base Reanalysis in Generative Grammar" McGuil University 1978

      4 Roberts,Ian, "Verbs and Diachronic Syntax:a Comparative History of English and French" Kluwer 1993

      5 Lasnik,Howard, "Verbal Morphology:Syntactic Structures Meets the Minimalist Program" University of Connecticut 1994

      6 Pintzuk, Susan, "Verb-Object Order in Old English: Variation as Grammatical Competition, Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change" Oxford University Press 276-299, 2002

      7 Kroch,Anthony, "Verb-Object Order in Early Middle English, Diachronic Syntax: Model and Mechanism" Oxford University Press 2000

      8 Pintzuk, Susan, "Verb Seconding in Old English: Verb Movement to INFL" 10 : 5-35, 1993

      9 Pollock,Jean, "Verb Movement,UG and the Structure of IP" 20 : 365-424, 1989

      10 Lightfoot,David, "Verb Movement" Cambridge University Press 1994

      11 Nunes, Jairo, "VO or OV? That's the Underlying Question: Commentary on Pintzuk, Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change" Oxford University Press 300-306, 2002

      12 Pillippe,Julian, "The Rise of the Article the Germanic Language, Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change" Cambridge University. Press 62-93, 1997

      13 Gelderen, Elly. van, "The Rise of Functional Categories" John ?enjamins 1993

      14 Jarad, Najib. Ismail, "The Old English to-Infinitive: Its Status & Recategorisation" 2 (2): 57-104, 2003

      15 Chomsky,Noam, "The Minimalist Program" MIT Press 1995

      16 Kroch,Anthony, "Syntactic Change, Oxford International Encyclopedia of Linguistics" Oxford University Press 1992

      17 Kemenade,A.van., "Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English" Foris 1987

      18 Davis,N., "Sweet's Anglo-Saxon Primer" Clarendon 1953

      19 Kroch,Anthony, "Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change" 1 : 199-204, 1989

      20 Lightfoot, David, "Principle of Diachronic Syntax" Cambridge University Press 1979

      21 Pintzuk,Susan, "Phrase Structures in Competition:Variation and Change in Old English Word Order" Garland 1999

      22 Rivero,Mar? Luisa, "On Two Location for Complement Clitic Pronouns, Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change" Cambridge University. Press 170-206, 1997

      23 Chomsky,Noam, "On Phase" MIT 2005

      24 Kroch, Anthony, "Morphosyntactic Variation" 180-201, 1994

      25 Chomsky,Noam, "Minimalist Inquiries:The Framework, Step by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik" MIT Press 89-157, 2000

      26 Lightfoot,David, "How to Set Parameter:Arguments from Language Change" MIT press 1991

      27 Denison,David, "English Historical Syntax" Longman Publishing 1995

      28 Roberts,Ian, "Directionality and Word Order in the History of English, Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change" Cambridge University Press 397-426, 1997

      29 Wurff, W. van der, "Deriving Object-Verb Order in Late Middle English" 33 : 485-509, 1997

      30 Chomsky,Noam, "Derivation by Phrase, Ken Hale: A Life in Language" MIT Press 1-53, 2001

      31 Biberauer,Theresa, "Changing EPP Parameters in the History of English:Accounting for Variation and Change" Cambridge University Press 9 : 5-46, 2005

      32 Chomsky,Noam, "Beyond the Explanatory Adequacy" MIT 2000

      33 Chomsky,Noam, "Approaching UG from Below" MIT 2006

      34 Kayne, Richard S., "Antisymmetry" MIT Press 1994

      35 Visser, F. T., "An Historical Syntax of the English Language, 4 volumes" E. J. Brill 1963

      36 Traugott,Elizabeth, "A History of English Syntax" Holt, Reinhart and Winston 1972

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-08-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국언어학회(대표:홍재성) -> 한국언어학회 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-08-16 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국언어학회(대표:임홍빈) -> 한국언어학회(대표:홍재성)
      영문명 : The Linguistic Society Of Korea -> The Linguistic Society of Korea
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-19 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Linguistics KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.67 0.6 1.198 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼