RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      요가의 대전환_인도 현대요가의 신자유주의적 전환 = The Great Transition in Yoga: The Neo-liberal Transformation of Modern Yoga in India

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since the 15th century, some traditional Indian yoga practitioners, known as warrior-ascetics, have used yoga as a method of military training to resist foreign powers. Referred to as "Yogi" by the British, these people once held significant power controlling the trade routes of northern India. However, after the late 18th century, due to oppressive British policies, they were reduced to making a living by performing yogic feats or as wanderers. As a result, the British and the Indian intellectual class came to perceive the Yogis as vagrants or as impure beings outside the caste system. However, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, some Indian nationalists who advocated for armed struggle against the British became interested in their yoga as a method of military training for armed resistance. During this period, Indian yoga evolved into modern yoga in two directions: international orientation and domestic orientation within India, particularly the latter interested in yoga as a military training method. However, both of them shared strong nationalist tendencies. The nationalism and two directions of the early reformers of modern yoga in India have been continued in the yoga policies of the Modi government. However, the nationalism of the Modi government is merely superficial; the true essence of Modi’s yoga policy lies in a neoliberal view of humanity. F. Godrej argued that the two important discourses of modern yoga are the discourse of self-responsibilization and the biopolitical discourse, based on a neoliberal view of humanity. C. P. Miller, following the stance of Godrej, analyzed yoga policies in India since the Modi government. He argues that the Modi government, in connection with the discourse of self-responsibility, presents yoga as a solution to climate issues and strengthens soft power, in contrast to the hard power of the United States and China. On the one hand, from a domestic orientation, He argues that the lack of healthcare infrastructure in India is being compensated for by encouraging citizens to practice yoga, and yoga is utilized as a bio-politcal biopower to maximize the labor force of the population. The yoga policies of the Modi government, such as the establishment of International Yoga Day, the creation of the Ministry of AYUSH, which controls the practical application of yoga and traditional Indian medicine, and Modi's image-making as a Yoga guru, may seem positive at first glance. However, considering the neoliberalism within the yoga policy, the grand transition of India from a secular state to a Hindu religious state is merely a political utilization of Hindu nationalism as a symbol. One cannot help but suspect that the underlying intention is to strengthen the vested interests of capitalists and certain political factions based on neoliberal principles. The Modi government is hanging up a lamb's head of Hindu nationalism while actually selling the dog meat of neoliberalism.
      번역하기

      Since the 15th century, some traditional Indian yoga practitioners, known as warrior-ascetics, have used yoga as a method of military training to resist foreign powers. Referred to as "Yogi" by the British, these people once held significant power con...

      Since the 15th century, some traditional Indian yoga practitioners, known as warrior-ascetics, have used yoga as a method of military training to resist foreign powers. Referred to as "Yogi" by the British, these people once held significant power controlling the trade routes of northern India. However, after the late 18th century, due to oppressive British policies, they were reduced to making a living by performing yogic feats or as wanderers. As a result, the British and the Indian intellectual class came to perceive the Yogis as vagrants or as impure beings outside the caste system. However, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, some Indian nationalists who advocated for armed struggle against the British became interested in their yoga as a method of military training for armed resistance. During this period, Indian yoga evolved into modern yoga in two directions: international orientation and domestic orientation within India, particularly the latter interested in yoga as a military training method. However, both of them shared strong nationalist tendencies. The nationalism and two directions of the early reformers of modern yoga in India have been continued in the yoga policies of the Modi government. However, the nationalism of the Modi government is merely superficial; the true essence of Modi’s yoga policy lies in a neoliberal view of humanity. F. Godrej argued that the two important discourses of modern yoga are the discourse of self-responsibilization and the biopolitical discourse, based on a neoliberal view of humanity. C. P. Miller, following the stance of Godrej, analyzed yoga policies in India since the Modi government. He argues that the Modi government, in connection with the discourse of self-responsibility, presents yoga as a solution to climate issues and strengthens soft power, in contrast to the hard power of the United States and China. On the one hand, from a domestic orientation, He argues that the lack of healthcare infrastructure in India is being compensated for by encouraging citizens to practice yoga, and yoga is utilized as a bio-politcal biopower to maximize the labor force of the population. The yoga policies of the Modi government, such as the establishment of International Yoga Day, the creation of the Ministry of AYUSH, which controls the practical application of yoga and traditional Indian medicine, and Modi's image-making as a Yoga guru, may seem positive at first glance. However, considering the neoliberalism within the yoga policy, the grand transition of India from a secular state to a Hindu religious state is merely a political utilization of Hindu nationalism as a symbol. One cannot help but suspect that the underlying intention is to strengthen the vested interests of capitalists and certain political factions based on neoliberal principles. The Modi government is hanging up a lamb's head of Hindu nationalism while actually selling the dog meat of neoliberalism.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼