高氏 門中의 訟事를 통해 본 傳統 相續法의 變遷 = The Transition of the Traditional Inheritance Law of Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper deals with the 2 precedents of the Chosun Godeungbeobwon(Chosun High Court), the highest court in the colonial Korea, in the 1930s arising from the same dispute within the family.
The background of the dispute was as following: in 1907, Ko Kwangsun, the 12th Jongson(The eldest son of the family, representing the family) of Ko Inhu, who had died in the battle against the invading Japan in 1592, also died in the battle against the Japan. According to the traditional inheritance law of Korea, the eldest son of Ko Kwangsun, Ko Jaehwan, should become the heir of the ancestor worship ritual for Ko Inhu. But other family members had prevented him from becoming the heir, because Jaehwan, was deaf and dumb.
After the death of Jaehwan, his son Ko Hyunseong tried to regain the heirship of the ancestor worship ritual for Ko Inhu twice. In the first case, Hyunseong raised the suit to get the confirmation that he was the proper heir of the ancestor worship ritual. But the Chosun Godeungbeobwon held that Hyunseong had no interest to raise such a suit on the reason that the dispute over the proper heir of the ancestor worship ritual could not be deemed as a legal dispute, in effect overruling the former precedents.
After this, Hyunseong raised another suit to recover the ancestoral tablet of Ko Inhu, asserting that this belonged to him, the proper heir. But Chosun Godeungbeobwon rejected his claim on the reason that his claim was barred by the statute of limitation.
But these rulings were not the exact application of the traditional Korean inheritance law. Rather, these should be understood as substituting the Japanese inheritance law for the traditional Korean inheritance law. This paper explains the outline of the traditional Korean inheritance law and analyses the process of the transition of the traditional Korean inheritance law.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 事件의 槪要
• Ⅲ. 祭祀相續制度의 變遷
• Ⅳ. 相續回復請求權에 관한 判例의 變更
• Ⅴ. 廢嫡의 慣習에 대하여
• Ⅵ. 變化된 慣習相續法의 韓國 民法에의 承繼
• Ⅶ. 傳統相續法의 變遷에 대한 所見
• Ⅷ. 마치는 말
• 參考文獻
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "호주제도의 역사와 전망" 대한변호사협회지 제81호 1982

2 "호주제도론" 467-, 1999

3 "호주제 개선방안에 관한 조사연구" 여성부 2001

4 "한국의 家族과 宗族" 1990

5 "한국 사회의 유교적 변환" 2003

6 "조선고등법원과 현대 한국법" (23) : 91-, 2003

7 "조선고등법원 단상(1) 시민과 변호사" 118-, 2004.8

8 "식민지 시기 한국 가족법의 관습 문제 Ⅰ" 58 : 39-, 2000

9 "상속회복청구권의 시효에 관한 일제시대 관습법의 정립과 왜곡" 18 (18): 205-, 2004

10 "만들어진 전통" 2004

11 "默齋日記에 나타난 家祭祀의 實態" (16) : 229-, 1999

12 "韓國의 戶主制度 家族法의 變動要因과 現狀" 235-, 1998

13 "韓國近代法史攷" 2002

14 "韓國相續法의 成文化過程" 慶北大學校 大學院 博士學位論文 1986

15 "韓國法制史攷" 1974

16 "韓國戶籍制度史 硏究" 1997

17 "韓國家族法硏究" 1967

18 "韓國家族法と日本家族法" 1992

19 "韓國家族制度史硏究" 1983

20 "近世의 法과 法思想" 1996

21 "親族相續法의 立法方針 及 親族相續法起草要綱私案" 1967

22 "舊慣習上 戶主아닌 家族이 死亡한 경우의 財産相續人" 1991

23 "相續慣習法에 대한 立法論的 考察 韓國家族法硏究" 1967 413면이하

24 "相續回復請求權의 消滅時效에 관한 舊慣習의 違憲 與否 및 判例의 遡及效" 11 (11): 275-, 2004

25 "相續回復請求權의 硏究 - 歷史的 및 比較法的 考察" 41 (41): 2000

26 "現代民法의 課題와 展望" 1994

27 "朝鮮總督府 中樞院 調査課"推定祭祀相續人의 廢除에 관한 慣習"" 1967

28 "朝鮮祭祀相續法論 序說" 1939

29 "朝鮮前期의 財産相續" 2000

30 "朝鮮前期相續法制" 2002

31 "朝鮮前期 四代奉祀의 形成過程에 대한 一考察 法制硏究 11號" (11) : 130-, 1996

32 "朝鮮初期 祭祀承繼法制의 成立에 관한 硏究" 1996

33 "朝鮮中期 祭祀承繼의 實態 朝鮮의 政治와 社會" 589-, 2002

34 "日本民法上 祭祀財産의 承繼에 관한 硏究" 423-, 2001

35 "日帝下의 家族政策과 慣習法形成過程 家族法論集" 89-, 1996

36 "日帝下 傳統家族法의 歪曲" 1991

37 "改譯版 慣習調査報告書" 2000

38 "16세기 奉祀財産의 實態" 139-, 1996