RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      현행 인체유래물은행 기증 동의의 문제점과 그 개선방안

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109512201

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Human Material Bank is in charge of promoting the activation of research by collecting and preserving not only human materials but also related information such as genetic information, epidemiological information, and clinical information from donors. It goes without saying that prior consent must be obtained by sufficient explanation of related information in addition to human materials. However, even considering the purpose of the Human Material Bank as a research infrastructure, the current Bioethics And Safety Act on the consent to donate human materials and related information is insufficient in the consent principle. This study is to propose improvement measures by analyzing the deficiencies of the current law from the perspective of the principle of consent. First, the law only provides clear regulations on the consent to donate human materials and other related information, but does not have a clear basis for consent to donate other related information, causing confusion not only about the role category of the Human Material Bank but also the category of the target to be provided. In this regard, it is proposed to use the terms 'human resource' or 'human materials, etc.' that encompass related information. Second, the law only receives broad consent that does not specify or limit the researchers or researchers to which the donor's human materials and related information will be used, and there are no special regulations to guarantee the right to self-determination in case it is used or provided for unexpected purposes at the time of donation. In addition to the legal form, a separate explanation should be made, and the donor's choice should be given more than broad consent to ensure the right to self-determination as much as possible. Third, the law also includes consent from electronic documents in written consent, and in this case, there is controversy over whether electronic copies are allowed in the provision of copies of consent, but it is reasonable to assume that this is permitted.
      번역하기

      The Human Material Bank is in charge of promoting the activation of research by collecting and preserving not only human materials but also related information such as genetic information, epidemiological information, and clinical information from don...

      The Human Material Bank is in charge of promoting the activation of research by collecting and preserving not only human materials but also related information such as genetic information, epidemiological information, and clinical information from donors. It goes without saying that prior consent must be obtained by sufficient explanation of related information in addition to human materials. However, even considering the purpose of the Human Material Bank as a research infrastructure, the current Bioethics And Safety Act on the consent to donate human materials and related information is insufficient in the consent principle. This study is to propose improvement measures by analyzing the deficiencies of the current law from the perspective of the principle of consent. First, the law only provides clear regulations on the consent to donate human materials and other related information, but does not have a clear basis for consent to donate other related information, causing confusion not only about the role category of the Human Material Bank but also the category of the target to be provided. In this regard, it is proposed to use the terms 'human resource' or 'human materials, etc.' that encompass related information. Second, the law only receives broad consent that does not specify or limit the researchers or researchers to which the donor's human materials and related information will be used, and there are no special regulations to guarantee the right to self-determination in case it is used or provided for unexpected purposes at the time of donation. In addition to the legal form, a separate explanation should be made, and the donor's choice should be given more than broad consent to ensure the right to self-determination as much as possible. Third, the law also includes consent from electronic documents in written consent, and in this case, there is controversy over whether electronic copies are allowed in the provision of copies of consent, but it is reasonable to assume that this is permitted.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼