RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    類義語「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の使用実態について - 韓国人日本語学習者を対象に - = Acquisition of Synonyms Kibun, Kimothi, Kigen

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106226693

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the acquisition situation, along with the meaning and usage of “kibun” “kimothi” “kigen,”as used to express the speaker’s physical condition.
    In the examination of the colloquial use of “kibun,” “kimothi,” and “kigen,” I searched Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese through the concordancer “syounagon” ‘KOTONOHA’.
    According to a Japanese questionnaire survey, Japanese people do not seem to have much difficulty in distinguishing between “kibun,” “kimothi,” and “kigen”. However, they cause Korean Japanese learners a certain degree of confusion as all three words “kibun,” “kimothi,” “kigen” are translated into “KIBUN” in Korean and differ from the Korean usage. The overall correct answer rate among the Korean Japanese learners is 73.3%, which is considerably lower than the overall correct answer rate of 94.0% among the Japanese respondents.
    The rate of the correct answer for each item is as follows: 77.9% for “kibun”, which is the highest among the three items, 70.8%" for “kimothi” and 71.5% for “kigen”. The reason for the relatively high rate of the correct answer for “kibun” can be influenced by the presence of Korean “KIBUN”. Because there is not much difference in the correct answer rates among the three words, it can be inferred that the acquisition of “kibun,” “kimothi,” and “kigen” is not related to the learner’s level of Japanese. Even if the learner’s Japanese improves, the influence of Korean will continue for the time being.
    번역하기

    This study examines the acquisition situation, along with the meaning and usage of “kibun” “kimothi” “kigen,”as used to express the speaker’s physical condition. In the examination of the colloquial use of “kibun,” “kimothi,” an...

    This study examines the acquisition situation, along with the meaning and usage of “kibun” “kimothi” “kigen,”as used to express the speaker’s physical condition.
    In the examination of the colloquial use of “kibun,” “kimothi,” and “kigen,” I searched Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese through the concordancer “syounagon” ‘KOTONOHA’.
    According to a Japanese questionnaire survey, Japanese people do not seem to have much difficulty in distinguishing between “kibun,” “kimothi,” and “kigen”. However, they cause Korean Japanese learners a certain degree of confusion as all three words “kibun,” “kimothi,” “kigen” are translated into “KIBUN” in Korean and differ from the Korean usage. The overall correct answer rate among the Korean Japanese learners is 73.3%, which is considerably lower than the overall correct answer rate of 94.0% among the Japanese respondents.
    The rate of the correct answer for each item is as follows: 77.9% for “kibun”, which is the highest among the three items, 70.8%" for “kimothi” and 71.5% for “kigen”. The reason for the relatively high rate of the correct answer for “kibun” can be influenced by the presence of Korean “KIBUN”. Because there is not much difference in the correct answer rates among the three words, it can be inferred that the acquisition of “kibun,” “kimothi,” and “kigen” is not related to the learner’s level of Japanese. Even if the learner’s Japanese improves, the influence of Korean will continue for the time being.

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    韓国人学習者は「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の使い分けに混乱しているようである。それは「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の語が三つともに韓国語「기분」に訳されるし、韓国語の用法と違うところがあるのにその意味の用法がわかりにくいからである。それで、今回は 類議語「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の意味、用法とともに、使用の実態について考察した。体調を表すとき「気分がいい․悪い」を使う。「気分がいい」は病気の人の体調について使う。「気持がいい」はさわやかさ․安心感․ここちよさなど快い感じを表すとき使う。「気持が悪い」は嫌悪感をもよおさせるものに対して使い、吐き気がするような体調の悪さも表わす。 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス「少納言」KOTONOHAに表われた「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の例文から日本人の口語表現には、快·不快の表現に「気持いい」がよく使われることがわかる。 日本人のアンケート調査によると、日本人は「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の使い分けにはあまり問題ないように伺われる。韓国人学習者の全体の正答率は73.3%で、日本人の全体の正答率94.0%より低い。レベルによる正答率の差があまりないことから「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の習得はレベルとは関係ないことがわかる。レベルが上がって日本語能力がのびても韓国語の影響はすぐはなくならないということだと思われる。
    번역하기

    韓国人学習者は「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の使い分けに混乱しているようである。それは「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の語が三つともに韓国語「기분」に訳されるし、韓国語の用法と違う...

    韓国人学習者は「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の使い分けに混乱しているようである。それは「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の語が三つともに韓国語「기분」に訳されるし、韓国語の用法と違うところがあるのにその意味の用法がわかりにくいからである。それで、今回は 類議語「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の意味、用法とともに、使用の実態について考察した。体調を表すとき「気分がいい․悪い」を使う。「気分がいい」は病気の人の体調について使う。「気持がいい」はさわやかさ․安心感․ここちよさなど快い感じを表すとき使う。「気持が悪い」は嫌悪感をもよおさせるものに対して使い、吐き気がするような体調の悪さも表わす。 現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス「少納言」KOTONOHAに表われた「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の例文から日本人の口語表現には、快·不快の表現に「気持いい」がよく使われることがわかる。 日本人のアンケート調査によると、日本人は「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の使い分けにはあまり問題ないように伺われる。韓国人学習者の全体の正答率は73.3%で、日本人の全体の正答率94.0%より低い。レベルによる正答率の差があまりないことから「気分」「気持」「機嫌」の習得はレベルとは関係ないことがわかる。レベルが上がって日本語能力がのびても韓国語の影響はすぐはなくならないということだと思われる。

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 泉原省二, "類義語使い分け辞典" 研究社 278-279, 1998

    2 日本語教育誤用例研究会, "類似表現の使い分けと指導法" アルク 153-162, 1997

    3 民衆書林編輯局, "民衆엣센스 日韓․韓日辞典" 民衆書林 288-, 1997

    4 広瀬正宣, "日本語学習使い分け辞典" 講談社 258-261, 1994

    5 北原保雄, "日本国語大辞典" 小学館 55-, 2000

    6 金田一春彦, "学研国語大辞典" 学習研究者 257-258, 1995

    7 김창규, "「気持ち」と「気分」の意味用法および使い分けに関する 研究" 대한일어일문학회 (27) : 35-46, 2005

    1 泉原省二, "類義語使い分け辞典" 研究社 278-279, 1998

    2 日本語教育誤用例研究会, "類似表現の使い分けと指導法" アルク 153-162, 1997

    3 民衆書林編輯局, "民衆엣센스 日韓․韓日辞典" 民衆書林 288-, 1997

    4 広瀬正宣, "日本語学習使い分け辞典" 講談社 258-261, 1994

    5 北原保雄, "日本国語大辞典" 小学館 55-, 2000

    6 金田一春彦, "学研国語大辞典" 学習研究者 257-258, 1995

    7 김창규, "「気持ち」と「気分」の意味用法および使い分けに関する 研究" 대한일어일문학회 (27) : 35-46, 2005

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.25 0.25 0.27
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.25 0.23 0.565 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼