RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전문건설업 단위작업별 위험성평가 유해·위험요인 확인방법 개선방안에 관한 연구 - 건축 및 인프라 토공·철근콘크리트 공종을 중심으로 - = A study on improving the method of identifying hazardous and risk factors in risk assessment for each unit of work in the specialized construction industry - Focusing on architecture & infrastructure earthwork and reinforced concrete work -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109978512

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The construction industry is plagued by a high proportion of industrial accidents and fatalities Approximately half of all industrial fatalities in 2024 will occur mainly in the specialized construction. This is due to the numerous subcontractors and complex work environments across various types of work, which often leave blind spots in risk management and a high probability of serious accidents. Construction sites primarily rely on risk assessments, primarily those based on frequency and intensity methods, which often hinder the precise identification of task-specific risk factors. This study aimed to propose an effective method for identifying hazards and risks appropriate for each task and type of work in the specialized construction industry. A survey was conducted with 83 workers from four specialized construction companies engaged in architectural reinforced concrete and infrastructure earthwork and reinforced concrete work. The survey analyzed the current status of risk factor identification methods, the necessity of applying them to each task, and the reasons for selecting them. The analysis revealed that the frequency and intensity risk assessment method is widely used in most construction sites. However, the need for alternative methods, such as work plans or pre-work permits, was raised for unit tasks: system scaffolding and shoring, CPB, insulation and curing, hot work, confined space work, and vehicle loading and unloading and construction equipment. A majority of respondents believed that applying differentiated verification methods for each unit task facilitates the identification of risk factors tailored to the specific task, enhances worker understanding and participation, and is effective in preventing accidents. This study emphasizes the need to develop a customized risk assessment system that reflects work characteristics of the specialized construction industry.
    번역하기

    The construction industry is plagued by a high proportion of industrial accidents and fatalities Approximately half of all industrial fatalities in 2024 will occur mainly in the specialized construction. This is due to the numerous subcontractors and ...

    The construction industry is plagued by a high proportion of industrial accidents and fatalities Approximately half of all industrial fatalities in 2024 will occur mainly in the specialized construction. This is due to the numerous subcontractors and complex work environments across various types of work, which often leave blind spots in risk management and a high probability of serious accidents. Construction sites primarily rely on risk assessments, primarily those based on frequency and intensity methods, which often hinder the precise identification of task-specific risk factors. This study aimed to propose an effective method for identifying hazards and risks appropriate for each task and type of work in the specialized construction industry. A survey was conducted with 83 workers from four specialized construction companies engaged in architectural reinforced concrete and infrastructure earthwork and reinforced concrete work. The survey analyzed the current status of risk factor identification methods, the necessity of applying them to each task, and the reasons for selecting them. The analysis revealed that the frequency and intensity risk assessment method is widely used in most construction sites. However, the need for alternative methods, such as work plans or pre-work permits, was raised for unit tasks: system scaffolding and shoring, CPB, insulation and curing, hot work, confined space work, and vehicle loading and unloading and construction equipment. A majority of respondents believed that applying differentiated verification methods for each unit task facilitates the identification of risk factors tailored to the specific task, enhances worker understanding and participation, and is effective in preventing accidents. This study emphasizes the need to develop a customized risk assessment system that reflects work characteristics of the specialized construction industry.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼