RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      회사분할과 개별적 근로관계의 승계 = Division of Company and Succession of Individual Labor Relations

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In 2013, the Supreme Court made the judgment on the issue of succession of individual labor relations in the event of division of a company, forming a different logic from the transfer of operations. The division of a company is a system of organizational changes of a corporation under the commercial law, which was introduced in Korea about 20 years ago, in the middle of the debate on the succession of labor relations in the transfer of business in the labor law academic circles. However, despite the differences in the methods of organizational change of a company, there is no difference between the transfer or division of operations in terms of the transfer of workers' working relationships. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court takes the position that individual labor relations are automatically inherited subject to procedural legitimacy in the division of a company. If there need to be differences in succession of individual labor relations between the division of a company and the transfer of operations, the Supreme Court have to reveal the differences in the succession of individual labor relations between those two cases or the position would be contradictory. Pointing out this point, this paper states that the succession of individual labor relations in a company's organizational changes, such as division of the company or the transfer of operations, is actually the same as both of them are changes of employers in employment contracts, and thus the issue of labor relations should be solved through the logic of labor law.
      번역하기

      In 2013, the Supreme Court made the judgment on the issue of succession of individual labor relations in the event of division of a company, forming a different logic from the transfer of operations. The division of a company is a system of organizati...

      In 2013, the Supreme Court made the judgment on the issue of succession of individual labor relations in the event of division of a company, forming a different logic from the transfer of operations. The division of a company is a system of organizational changes of a corporation under the commercial law, which was introduced in Korea about 20 years ago, in the middle of the debate on the succession of labor relations in the transfer of business in the labor law academic circles. However, despite the differences in the methods of organizational change of a company, there is no difference between the transfer or division of operations in terms of the transfer of workers' working relationships. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court takes the position that individual labor relations are automatically inherited subject to procedural legitimacy in the division of a company. If there need to be differences in succession of individual labor relations between the division of a company and the transfer of operations, the Supreme Court have to reveal the differences in the succession of individual labor relations between those two cases or the position would be contradictory. Pointing out this point, this paper states that the succession of individual labor relations in a company's organizational changes, such as division of the company or the transfer of operations, is actually the same as both of them are changes of employers in employment contracts, and thus the issue of labor relations should be solved through the logic of labor law.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권오성, "회사분할과 근로관계의 승계" 한국노동법학회 (66) : 105-132, 2018

      2 노상헌, "회사분할과 근로관계" 한국노동법학회 (38) : 151-175, 2011

      3 최석환, "회사 분할에 따른 근로관계의 승계에 관한 법리" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (36) : 207-242, 2014

      4 정동윤, "주석 상법" 한국사법행정학회 2014

      5 이승욱, "노동법상 사업양도의 의의와 한계" 한국노동법학회 (10) : 2000

      6 김형배, "노동법" 박영사 2018

      7 박은정, "기업집단과 노동법- 노사협의와 단체교섭제도를 중심으로" 한국노동연구원 2007

      8 맹수석, "會社의 分割에 따른 法律問題" 법학연구소 8 (8): 171-191, 1997

      1 권오성, "회사분할과 근로관계의 승계" 한국노동법학회 (66) : 105-132, 2018

      2 노상헌, "회사분할과 근로관계" 한국노동법학회 (38) : 151-175, 2011

      3 최석환, "회사 분할에 따른 근로관계의 승계에 관한 법리" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (36) : 207-242, 2014

      4 정동윤, "주석 상법" 한국사법행정학회 2014

      5 이승욱, "노동법상 사업양도의 의의와 한계" 한국노동법학회 (10) : 2000

      6 김형배, "노동법" 박영사 2018

      7 박은정, "기업집단과 노동법- 노사협의와 단체교섭제도를 중심으로" 한국노동연구원 2007

      8 맹수석, "會社의 分割에 따른 法律問題" 법학연구소 8 (8): 171-191, 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.89 0.82 1.527 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼