RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Proposed Changes to the U.S. Antitrust Laws - Antitrust Regulations in Digital Economy -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108311327

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Rapid development of digital technology has enabled and fostered the growth of digital economy. Distinctive characteristics of digital platform markets, such as the use of personal data, network effects or switching costs, provide giant platform markets with unprecedented amount of market power, posing new kinds of threats to antitrust regulation.
      In response, countries with advanced competition laws such as U.S., EU, Germany and Japan are trying to implement stronger regulation targeting certain giant platforms. European Parliament has voted in favor of Digital Services Act(DSA) and Digital Markets Act(DMA) in July, 2022. Germany has also amended its Act against Restraints of Competition(GWB), and Japan has enacted The Act on Improving Transparency and Fairness of Digital Platforms(TFDPA) in May, 2020.
      In 2021, Competition and Antitrust Law Enforcement Reform Act(CALERA) and five bipartisan antitrust package bills have been proposed in the U.S. House. They offer stronger regulations against giant platform companies including shift in burden of proof or ex ante regulations. Such global trend toward implementation of new regulations is caused by rise of New Brandeisians proposing new standards to replace consumer welfare. They argue that consumer welfare standard has failed in adopting to online platform markets, and protecting competition.
      Korean legislators have also made several changes to related laws, including an amendment of Telecommunications Business Act(hereinafter Telecommunications Act Amendment) and pre-announcement of amendment on Act on the Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce in 2021. Korean Fair Trade Commission(KFTC) and Korean Communications Commission(KCC) have proposed Fair Online Platform Intermediary Transactions Act(hereinafter Online Platform Act) and an Act on Protection of Online Consumer Users, respectively. However, proposed bills in Korea differ from global trend, as they have larger scope with Online Platform Act being expected to be applied to about 20 platform companies, and it is unclear whether they can be enforced effectively upon foreign big tech firms, as it can be seen in case where Google has forced Kakao into using only in-app payment in spite of recent Telecommunications Act Amendment. Under such circumstances, currently proposed regulations may fail to reach their goals, and even harm national interest by damaging competitiveness of domestic platforms.
      Therefore, we need to develop our own standards and measures for online platform regulations. Although current administration is supporting industry self-regulation, as self-regulation does not mean absence of regulation, we still need to seek for regulatory system that balances between restraint of anticompetitive conducts and development of platform economy.
      This paper will look into the proposed changes to the U.S. antitrust laws, and discussions regarding them. First, analysis of the proposed bills, CALERA and A Stronger Online Economy: Opportunity, Innovation, Choice, will be presented. After that, they will be compared with regulations in other countries. Lastly, review on the discussions regarding the consumer welfare standard, and current international departure from it in competition laws, will be suggested.
      번역하기

      Rapid development of digital technology has enabled and fostered the growth of digital economy. Distinctive characteristics of digital platform markets, such as the use of personal data, network effects or switching costs, provide giant platform marke...

      Rapid development of digital technology has enabled and fostered the growth of digital economy. Distinctive characteristics of digital platform markets, such as the use of personal data, network effects or switching costs, provide giant platform markets with unprecedented amount of market power, posing new kinds of threats to antitrust regulation.
      In response, countries with advanced competition laws such as U.S., EU, Germany and Japan are trying to implement stronger regulation targeting certain giant platforms. European Parliament has voted in favor of Digital Services Act(DSA) and Digital Markets Act(DMA) in July, 2022. Germany has also amended its Act against Restraints of Competition(GWB), and Japan has enacted The Act on Improving Transparency and Fairness of Digital Platforms(TFDPA) in May, 2020.
      In 2021, Competition and Antitrust Law Enforcement Reform Act(CALERA) and five bipartisan antitrust package bills have been proposed in the U.S. House. They offer stronger regulations against giant platform companies including shift in burden of proof or ex ante regulations. Such global trend toward implementation of new regulations is caused by rise of New Brandeisians proposing new standards to replace consumer welfare. They argue that consumer welfare standard has failed in adopting to online platform markets, and protecting competition.
      Korean legislators have also made several changes to related laws, including an amendment of Telecommunications Business Act(hereinafter Telecommunications Act Amendment) and pre-announcement of amendment on Act on the Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce in 2021. Korean Fair Trade Commission(KFTC) and Korean Communications Commission(KCC) have proposed Fair Online Platform Intermediary Transactions Act(hereinafter Online Platform Act) and an Act on Protection of Online Consumer Users, respectively. However, proposed bills in Korea differ from global trend, as they have larger scope with Online Platform Act being expected to be applied to about 20 platform companies, and it is unclear whether they can be enforced effectively upon foreign big tech firms, as it can be seen in case where Google has forced Kakao into using only in-app payment in spite of recent Telecommunications Act Amendment. Under such circumstances, currently proposed regulations may fail to reach their goals, and even harm national interest by damaging competitiveness of domestic platforms.
      Therefore, we need to develop our own standards and measures for online platform regulations. Although current administration is supporting industry self-regulation, as self-regulation does not mean absence of regulation, we still need to seek for regulatory system that balances between restraint of anticompetitive conducts and development of platform economy.
      This paper will look into the proposed changes to the U.S. antitrust laws, and discussions regarding them. First, analysis of the proposed bills, CALERA and A Stronger Online Economy: Opportunity, Innovation, Choice, will be presented. After that, they will be compared with regulations in other countries. Lastly, review on the discussions regarding the consumer welfare standard, and current international departure from it in competition laws, will be suggested.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정혜련, "주요국의 온라인 플랫폼 규제 동향 - 최근 해외 입법 추진현황을 중심으로 -" 법학연구소 46 (46): 31-74, 2022

      2 Herbert Hovenkamp, "Whatever Did Happen to the Antitrust Movement" 2018

      3 Seong Yup Lee, "U.S.‘s Platform Antitrust Package Law, regulating Platform Monopoly for Innovation and Choice"

      4 Hugh Brogan, "The Penguin History of the United States of America" 2001

      5 Lina Khan, "The New Brandeis Movement: America’s Antimonopoly Debate" 9 (9): 2018

      6 Lina Khan, "The End of Antitrust History Revisited" 133 : 2020

      7 Tim Wu, "The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust In the New Gilded Age" 2018

      8 Jay B. Sykes, "The Big Tech Antitrust Bills" 2021

      9 Robert H. Bork, "The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War With Itself" 2021

      10 Stigler CTR, "Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms, Final Report"

      1 정혜련, "주요국의 온라인 플랫폼 규제 동향 - 최근 해외 입법 추진현황을 중심으로 -" 법학연구소 46 (46): 31-74, 2022

      2 Herbert Hovenkamp, "Whatever Did Happen to the Antitrust Movement" 2018

      3 Seong Yup Lee, "U.S.‘s Platform Antitrust Package Law, regulating Platform Monopoly for Innovation and Choice"

      4 Hugh Brogan, "The Penguin History of the United States of America" 2001

      5 Lina Khan, "The New Brandeis Movement: America’s Antimonopoly Debate" 9 (9): 2018

      6 Lina Khan, "The End of Antitrust History Revisited" 133 : 2020

      7 Tim Wu, "The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust In the New Gilded Age" 2018

      8 Jay B. Sykes, "The Big Tech Antitrust Bills" 2021

      9 Robert H. Bork, "The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War With Itself" 2021

      10 Stigler CTR, "Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms, Final Report"

      11 Limpscomb-Jackson, "Proposed Antitrust Reform Legislation: Sea Change or Nothing to See?" 25 (25): 2021

      12 Seong Yup Lee, "Platform Law & Policy" Pybook 2022

      13 Jang Poom, "Online Platform Act with Ex Ante·Ex Pots Regulatiosn" KDI Econoomic Data Center, National Economy 2021

      14 Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, "Investigation of Competition in Digital Markets"

      15 Drosey, E., "Hipster Antitrust Meets Public Choice Economics: The Consumer Welfare Standard, Rule of Law, and Rent-Seeking" Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle 2018

      16 Herbert Hovenkamp, "Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and its Practicies" 2005

      17 Jo Sung Guk, "Competition Law Issues of U.S. Amex Case"

      18 Lina Khan, "Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox" 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼