인지과학의 관점에서 본 서사극 이론 = Epic Theatre Reexamined from the Viewpoint of Cognitive Science

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Reexamining Brecht‘s theoretical hypotheses in terms of cognitive science, this essay arrived at several temporary interpretations. Cognitive science implies that empathy can precede the rational understanding in Verfremdungseffekt. The spectator tends to simulate the unfamiliar incident and character and feels the consequential embodied emotion that leads to the cognitive understanding. The similar situation can be found in social gestus. According to cognitive science, gesture(social gestus) is simulated in the mirror-neuron of spectator, arousing consequently the embodied emotion that triggers the succeeding understanding. The spectator apts to experience and feel physically the moving gesture before decoding it as a social signification. Brecht‘s intention that attempts to reveal the duality of actor and character by eliminating the fourth wall is negated by cognitive science. According to the theory of conceptual blending, the spectator under the eliminated fourth wall mixes actor and character, and simulates this blending image so that he experiences it imaginatively. As such, another kind of illusion can be formed when a fourth wall is collapsed. Meanwhile, the critical thinking of spectator Brecht wanted can be hard to occur during the performance. It is necessary for the spectator to recollect the bygone dialogue and action in terms of social context as if he presses the pause, stopping the playback while watching a play in video. In this respect the social meaning Brecht intended can be achieved more effectively by the stop motion like tableau. It would not only give the time for the spectator to consider the implied social signification, but also make him possible to decode a semiotic meaning as if interpreting a still picture. Or it can be delivered by the dialogue that expresses the playwright‘s critical judgement. In this case, the subject of critical thinking is not the spectator but the author. The alternative explanation that the cognitive science suggests illuminates theoretically the reasons why Brecht‘s theory fails to be realized in practice. In a sense, Brecht‘s theory is nothing but a theoretical hypothesis. It takes the premise that the emotion hinders the rational thinking, understanding emotion and reason oppositively like Plato. This assumption is negated easily by the recent cognitive science that sees the reason as a by-product of physical experience including emotion. The rational understanding, in this sense, begins from the embodied emotion. As such the cognitive science denies the dichotomy of emotion and reason that Brecht adopted. The theoretical hypothesis of cognitive science makes us recognize again the importance of bodily experience in theatre. In theatre the spectator tends to experience physically before decoding the intellectual meaning. The spectator Brecht wanted, therefore, is far from the reality. The spectator usually experiences and reacts physically before decoding the meaning critically. Thus Brecht‘s intention can be realized by the embodied emotion resulted from simulation. This tentative interpretation suggests that we need to pay more attention to the empirical study of spectatorship, not remaining in a speculative study.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이강임, "인지과학의 패러다임으로 살펴본 연기예술의 창조과정과 방법론 연구 -체계적이고 과학적인 공연학의 정립을 위하여" 한국연극학회 (38) : 121-182, 2009

2 Currie, Gregory, "이미지와 마음" 한울 2007

3 Sparshott, F.E., "음악미학: 음악의 의미와 가치에 관한 철학" 1 : 1988

4 주대창, "음악 이해의 여러 유형에 대한 원론적 고찰" 한국서양음악학회 8 : 265-290, 2005

5 Shank, Theodore, "연극미학" 서광사 1986

6 Elam, Keir, "연극과 희곡의 기호학" 평민사 1998

7 김미성, "언어적 메시지와 비언어적 메시지에 관한 이론: 정보이론/의미중개이론/의미의 협동조정이론/일반의미론/공간이론" (257) : 1992

8 Brecht, Bertolt, "서푼짜리 오페라, In 베르톨트 브레히트 희곡선 사천의 선인" 한마당 1988

9 김대현, "서사연기의 이론과 실제에 관한 연구" (11) : 1998

10 Brecht, Bertolt, "사천의 선인, In 베르톨트 브레히트 희곡선 사천의 선인" 한마당 1988

11 임지룡, "몸의 철학" 박이정 2002

12 Eaton, Katherine Bliss, "The Theatre of Meyerhold and Brecht" Greenwood 1985

13 Smith, Murray, "The Logic and Legacy of Brechtianism, In Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies" The University of Wisconsin Press 1996

14 Postlewait, Thomas, "The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Historiography" Cambridge UP 2009

15 Carlson, Marvin, "Performance: a Critical Introduction" Routledge 1996

16 Hart, Elizabeth, "Performance, Phenomenology, and Cognitive Turn, In Performance and Cognition" Routledge 2006

17 Foster, Susan Leigh, "Movement's contagion: the kinesthetic impact of performance, In The Cambridge Companion of Performance Studies" Cambridge UP 2008

18 Pavis, Patrice, "Language of the Stage: Essays in the Semiology of Theatre" Performing Arts 1982

19 McConachie, Bruce, "Introduction, In Performance and Cognition: Theatre Studies and the Cognitive Turn" Routledge 2006

20 Cook, Amy, "Interplay: The Method and Potential of a Cognitive Scientific Approach to Theatre" 59 : 2007

21 Langer, Susanne K., "Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art" Routledge 1979

22 McConachie, Bruce, "Falsifiable Theories for Theatre and Performance Studies" 59 : 2007

23 Bloch, Ernst, "Entfremdung, Verfremdung: Alienation, Estrangement" 15 (15): 1970

24 Neill, Alex, "Empathy and (Film) Fiction, In Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies" The University of Wisconsin Press 1996

25 Barthes, Roland, "Diderot, Brecht, Eisenstein" 15 (15): 1974

26 Roald, Tone, "Cognition in Emotion: An Investigation Through Experience With Art" eBook 2007

27 Brecht, Bertolt, "Brecht on Theatre" Hill and Wang 1964

28 Willett, John, "Brecht on Theatre" Hill and Wang 1989