동아시아 난생신화와 중국 한족(漢族)과의 관계 연구 = Relationships between Oviparous Myth of East Asia and the Han Chinese (Hanzu)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigated the relationships between the pedigree and people of the countries founded by the Dongyi Tribe and the Han Chinese through the oviparous founding myth. This myth is divided into two different stories: a founder hatching out of an egg through a woman and through a “thing”. The myth in which a founder hatches out of an egg through a woman has two characteristics: First, it describes the typical life pattern of a hero. Second, it contains the traces of a matrilineal society. In other words, it states a transition from a patrilineal society to a matrilineal one. The myth of a founder hatching out of an egg through a “thing” symbolizes the establishment of a patriarchal society. The oviparous type is found in the founding myths of Buyeo, Goguryeo, Silla, Gaya, Seokuk and Vietnam (Van Lang) including the founding myth of the Yin Dynasty. In terms of its distribution, most of the Chinese territory including the northern part of Vietnam and Northeast Asia was under the influence of the oviparous myth according to Shiji (Historical Records), that is, the primary historical resources of China. The heroes of the oviparous myth were from the Dongyi Tribe. From an anthropological perspective, Yin Dynasty, Zhou Dynasty, Buyeo, Seokuk, Goguryeo including Van Lang [Vietnam] are from the tree branches from one root. This study found that there is no correlation between the oviparous myth and the Han Chinese. However, some people have believed that they were related to each other because of Sima Qian. He described the Han Chinese-centric historical system and completed the genealogy of the Han Chinese (Yellow Emperor, Zhuanxu, Emperor Ku, Emperor Yao, Emperor Shun). The exegetes of Shiji annotated and described that the Five Emperors including the Yellow Emperor, were all from the Dongyi Tribe, based on the books of Sima Qian and contemporaries and other related resources. This proves that China’s history has been distorted from a long time ago.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "후한서, “동이열전”"

2 김화경, "한국 난생신화의 연구 -난생신화의 남방기원설에 대한 비판적 접근-" 국립민속박물관 (43) : 5-26, 2018

3 문일환, "한국 고대 조(鳥)숭배와 난생신화의 기원 및 그 진화 연구" 한국어문학국제학술포럼 2007

4 문일환, "한국 고대 남북 난생신화 연원연구" 한국어문학국제학술포럼 9 : 2007

5 우실하, "통일적다민족국가론의 전개와 적용" 고구려발해학회 29 : 63-86, 2007

6 원가, "중국의 고대신화" 문예출판사 2012

7 원가, "중국신화사 상" 웅진지식하우스 2010

8 김홍겸, "중국 난생신화의 초학제적 연구 — 알의 상징성과 그 인식 —" 동양고전학회 (61) : 503-528, 2015

9 "좌전·소공 17권 ‘전’"

10 "제왕세본"

11 장웨이, "제나라는 어디로 사라졌을까" 글항아리 2011

12 부사년, "이하동서설" 우리역사연구재단 2011

13 니콜라 디코스코, "오랑캐의 탄생" 황금가지 2005

14 낙빈기, "염제신농씨" 미래교류 2011

15 이지희, "아시아 지역 난생신화의 유형과 의미 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2005

16 아이엘 골란, "선사시대가 남긴 세계의 모든 문양" 푸른역사 2004

17 "상서 “우공”"

18 일연, "삼국유사" 솔 2002

19 김부식, "삼국사기" 솔 1997

20 "사기"

21 원이둬, "복희고" 소명출판 2013

22 무경, "베트남의 신화와 전설" 돌베개 2000

23 우실하, "동북공정의 최종판 ‘요하문명론’" 고조선단군학회 15 : 5-36, 2006

24 김재붕, "난생신화의 분포권" 한국문화인류학회 1971

25 이덕일, "고조선은 대륙의 지배자였다" 역사의아침 2006

26 고전연구소 편찬, "고려사 1" (평양)과학출판사 1962

27 박명숙, "고대 동이계열 민족 형성과정 중 새 토템 및 난생설화의 관계성 비교 연구" 국학연구소 14 : 2010

28 柳映先, "韓·滿族始祖神話比較硏究" 경원대학교 아시아문화연구소 5 : 2001

29 "新譯史記" 三民書局 2011

30 張光直, "中國古代社會" 東方書店 1994

31 臧厲龢, "中國古今地名辭典" 商務印書館 48-, 1982

32 徐旭生, "中國上古史論文選集 上" 華世出版社 1980