RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고고학 해석의 지평 넓히기 -고고학 자료에 대한 다양한 인식 검토- = An examination of the different perceptions of the archaeological record

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The various approaches used to interpret the archaeological evidence are based on different perceptions of the archaeological record. This paper aims to examine the interpretative possibilities and limitations of culture- historical archaeology and the various approaches of processual (the New Archaeology, behavioral archaeology, and Darwinian evolutionary archaeology) and post-processual archaeology (contextual archaeology, phenomenological approaches to the landscape, and a ``structuring`` archaeology) with focus on the way in which the archaeological record is perceived. In doing so, it is hoped that a better understanding of these approaches may be obtained, as well as the acknowledgement that, in the interpretation of a common data set, the dissimilar results produced by the various approaches should be regarded as being interpretations with different points of focus, rather than as being contrasting interpretations. It is suggested that this will help lay down the foundations for a more symbiotic relationship between the various archaeological approaches currently in use within Korean archaeology.
      번역하기

      The various approaches used to interpret the archaeological evidence are based on different perceptions of the archaeological record. This paper aims to examine the interpretative possibilities and limitations of culture- historical archaeology and th...

      The various approaches used to interpret the archaeological evidence are based on different perceptions of the archaeological record. This paper aims to examine the interpretative possibilities and limitations of culture- historical archaeology and the various approaches of processual (the New Archaeology, behavioral archaeology, and Darwinian evolutionary archaeology) and post-processual archaeology (contextual archaeology, phenomenological approaches to the landscape, and a ``structuring`` archaeology) with focus on the way in which the archaeological record is perceived. In doing so, it is hoped that a better understanding of these approaches may be obtained, as well as the acknowledgement that, in the interpretation of a common data set, the dissimilar results produced by the various approaches should be regarded as being interpretations with different points of focus, rather than as being contrasting interpretations. It is suggested that this will help lay down the foundations for a more symbiotic relationship between the various archaeological approaches currently in use within Korean archaeology.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이희준, "죽음의 고고학" 사회평론 2009

      2 성춘택, "브루스 트리거의 고고학사" 사회평론 2010

      3 마이클 오브라이언, "다윈 진화고고학" 나남 2005

      4 성춘택, "다위니즘으로 고고학하기, In 다윈 진화고고학" 603-615, 2005

      5 성춘택, "다위니즘과 진화고고학의 원칙" 호남고고학회 17 : 113-133, 2003

      6 콜린 렌프류, "고고학의 주요개념" 도서출판 고고 2010

      7 김종일, "고고학 이론: 입문" 도서출판 고고 2009

      8 김종일, "경관고고학의 이론적 특징과 적용 가능성" 한국고고학회 11 (11): 110-145, 2006

      9 Thomas, J., "Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archeology" Routledge 1996

      10 Hodder, I., "Theoretical Archaeology, In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology" Cambridge University Press 1-16, 1982

      1 이희준, "죽음의 고고학" 사회평론 2009

      2 성춘택, "브루스 트리거의 고고학사" 사회평론 2010

      3 마이클 오브라이언, "다윈 진화고고학" 나남 2005

      4 성춘택, "다위니즘으로 고고학하기, In 다윈 진화고고학" 603-615, 2005

      5 성춘택, "다위니즘과 진화고고학의 원칙" 호남고고학회 17 : 113-133, 2003

      6 콜린 렌프류, "고고학의 주요개념" 도서출판 고고 2010

      7 김종일, "고고학 이론: 입문" 도서출판 고고 2009

      8 김종일, "경관고고학의 이론적 특징과 적용 가능성" 한국고고학회 11 (11): 110-145, 2006

      9 Thomas, J., "Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archeology" Routledge 1996

      10 Hodder, I., "Theoretical Archaeology, In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology" Cambridge University Press 1-16, 1982

      11 Wylie, A., "The reaction against analogy" 8 : 63-111, 1985

      12 Thomas, J., "The politics of vision and archaeologies of landscape, In Landscape: politics and perspectives" Berg 19-48, 1993

      13 O’Brien, M. J, "The historical development of an evolutionary archaeology, In Darwinian Archaeologies" Plenum Press 17-32, 1996

      14 Thomas, J., "The hermeneutics of megalithic space, In Interpretative Archaeology" Berg 73-97, 1993

      15 Hodder, I., "The Present Past: An Introduction to Archaeology for Archaeologists" Batsford 1982

      16 Tilley, C., "The Materiality of Stone, In Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology" Berg 2004

      17 Collingwood, R. G., "The Idea of History" Oxford University Press 1946

      18 Childe, V. G., "The Danube in Prehistory" Oxford University Press 1929

      19 Schiffer, M. B., "Technological Perspectives on Behavioral Change" University of Arizona Press 1992

      20 Hodder, I., "Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture" Cambridge University Press 1982

      21 Tilley, C., "Round barrows and dykes as landscape metaphors" 14 : 185-203, 2004

      22 Hodder, I., "Reading the Past" Cambridge University Press 1986

      23 Fleming, A., "Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique" 16 (16): 267-280, 2006

      24 Cummings, V, "Places of Special Virtue: Megaliths in the Neolithic Landscape of Wales" Oxbow 2004

      25 Fleming, A., "Phenomenology and the megaliths of Wales: A dreaming too far?" 18 : 119-125, 1999

      26 Tilley, C., "Metaphor and Material Culture" Blackwell Publishers 1999

      27 Renfrew, C, "Megaliths, territories and populations, In Acculturation and continuity in Atlantic Europe" De Temple 198-220, 1976

      28 Fleming, A., "Megaliths and post-modernism: The case of Wales" 79 : 921-931, 2005

      29 Barrett, J. C, "Material culture, humanity and the beginnings of the Neolithic, In Internationale Fachtagung an der Johann Wolfgang Githe-Univerita¨t" Universita¨tsforschungen zur prahistorischen Archa¨ologie 2005

      30 Cummings, V., "Landscapes in motion. Interactive computer imagery and the Neolithic landscapes of the Outer Hebrides, In U.K. Chapter of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology" British Archaeological Reports 2000

      31 Patrik, L. E, "Is there an archaeological record?" 8 : 27-62, 1985

      32 Buchli, V. A., "Interpreting material culture, In Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past" Routledge 181-193, 1995

      33 Hodder, I., "Interpretative archaeology and its role" 56 : 7-18, 1991

      34 Johnsen, H, "Hermeneutics and archaeology: On the philosophy of contextual archaeology" 57 (57): 419-436, 1992

      35 Barrett, J. C., "Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, In 2900-1200 BC" Blackwell 1994

      36 Barrett, J. C., "Fields of discourse: Reconstructing a social archaeology" 7 : 5-16, 1998

      37 Cummings, V, "Divided places: Phenomenology and asymmetry in the monuments of the Black Mountains, southeast Wales" 12 : 57-70, 2002

      38 Day, P. E, "Ceramic Change and the practice of eating and drinking in Early Bronze Age Crete, In Cuisine and Society in Prehistoric Greece" Oxbow Books 45-62, 2004

      39 LaMotta, V. M., "Behavioral archaeology: toward a new synthesis, In Archaeological Theory Today" Polity Press 14-64, 2001

      40 Reid, J. J, "Behavioral archaeology: four strategies" 77 : 864-869, 1975

      41 Binford, L., "Behavioral archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise" 37 : 195-208, 1981

      42 Schiffer, M. B, "Behavioral Archaeology. New York: Academic Press, In Re-constructing Archaeology" Cambridge University Press 1987

      43 O’Brien, M. J., "Basic Incompatibilities between Evolutionary and Behavioral Archaeology" 63 (63): 485-498, 1998

      44 McGuire, R., "Archaeology: Reflections of a Prodigal Son, In Expanding Archaeology" University of Utah Press 162-177, 1995

      45 Barrett, J. C., "Archaeology as the investigation of the contexts of humanity, In Deconstructing Context: A Critical Approach to Archaeological Practice" Oxbow Books 194-211, 2006

      46 McGlade, J., "Archaeology and the ecodynamics of human-modified landscapes" 69 : 113-132, 1995

      47 McGlade, J., "Archaeology and evolution of cultural landscapes: Towards an interdisciplinary research agenda, In The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape" Routledge 458-482, 1999

      48 Thomas, J., "Archaeology and Modernity" Routledge 2004

      49 Tilley, C., "An Ethnography of the Neolithic" Cambridge University Press 1996

      50 Barrett, J. C., "Agency and the archaeological record, In Archaeological Theory Today" Polity Press 141-164, 2001

      51 Barrett, J. C., "A thesis on agency, In Agency in Archaeology" Routledge 61-68, 2000

      52 Barrett, J. C., "A perspective on the early architecture of western Europe, In Constructing Power: Architecture" Lit Verlag 2006

      53 Gould, R. A, "A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning" 1 : 335-381, 1982

      54 Tilley, C., "A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments" Berg 1994

      55 Barrett, J., "A Phenomenology of Landscape. A Crisis in British Landscape Archaeology?" 9 (9): 276-294, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-07 학회명변경 영문명 : Seoul National University Institute of Humanities -> Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University KCI등재
      2015-01-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Seoul National University the Journal of Humanites -> Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.68 0.62 1.317 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼