RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Washback of the Reformed College English Test in China: Focusing on Learner and Teacher Perceptions

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104617330

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is a preliminary attempt to estimate the effects of the reformed College English Test (CET) Band 4 on English education in China. Three research questions were addressed: (1) Does the reformed test format yield more beneficial effects on st...

      This study is a preliminary attempt to estimate the effects of the reformed College English Test (CET) Band 4 on English education in China. Three research questions were addressed: (1) Does the reformed test format yield more beneficial effects on students’ development of reading ability than the previous CET? (2) Do students and teachers perceive the washback of the reformed CET on college English education to be positive, negative, or insignificant? (3) What factors of teaching and learning process are directly affected by the test? Two groups of intermediate-level Chinese learners of English (n = 188) had been instructed for eight weeks either with reading tasks similar in type to the ones in the reformed CET or with tasks similar to the ones in the traditional CET. A post-test revealed that the reformed CET group gained more in reading comprehension ability than did the traditional group. Data concerning student and teacher perceptions of the new CET were collected using a questionnaire based on Alderson and Wall’s (1993) Washback Hypotheses. It was found that their perceived washback varied in extent across a range of factors involved in teaching and learning practices, which was far greater on learners than on teachers. The positive and negative aspects of the washback are discussed with respect to each factor and suggestions are made for future directions.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Huang, Daeyong, "语言测试反拨效应研究概述" 34 (34): 288-293, 2002

      2 Yang, Huizhong, "大学英语四、六级考试十五年回顾" 3 : 21-29, 2003

      3 Xiao, Yun, "关于英语测试的改革" 34 (34): 294-299, 2002

      4 Yang, Huizhong, "从四、六级考试看我国大学生当前的实际英语能力" 1 : 46-52, 2000

      5 Bailey, Kathleen M., "Working for Washback: A Review of the Washback Concept in Language Testing" 13 (13): 257-279, 1996

      6 Qi, Luxia, "Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 171-190, 2004

      7 Taylor, Lynda, "Washback and Impact" 59 (59): 154-155, 2005

      8 Messick, Samuel, "Validity and Washback in Language Testing" 13 (13): 241-256, 1996

      9 Jin, Yan, "The Backwash of the CET-SET on Teaching" 4 : 56-61, 2000

      10 Buck, Gary, "Testing Listening Comprehension in Japanese University Entrance Examinations" 10 (10): 15-42, 1988

      1 Huang, Daeyong, "语言测试反拨效应研究概述" 34 (34): 288-293, 2002

      2 Yang, Huizhong, "大学英语四、六级考试十五年回顾" 3 : 21-29, 2003

      3 Xiao, Yun, "关于英语测试的改革" 34 (34): 294-299, 2002

      4 Yang, Huizhong, "从四、六级考试看我国大学生当前的实际英语能力" 1 : 46-52, 2000

      5 Bailey, Kathleen M., "Working for Washback: A Review of the Washback Concept in Language Testing" 13 (13): 257-279, 1996

      6 Qi, Luxia, "Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 171-190, 2004

      7 Taylor, Lynda, "Washback and Impact" 59 (59): 154-155, 2005

      8 Messick, Samuel, "Validity and Washback in Language Testing" 13 (13): 241-256, 1996

      9 Jin, Yan, "The Backwash of the CET-SET on Teaching" 4 : 56-61, 2000

      10 Buck, Gary, "Testing Listening Comprehension in Japanese University Entrance Examinations" 10 (10): 15-42, 1988

      11 Alderson, J. Charles, "TOEFL Preparation Courses: A Study of Washback" 13 (13): 280-297, 1996

      12 Qi, Luxia, "Stakeholders’ Conflicting Aims Undermine the Washback Function of a High-stake Test" 22 (22): 142-173, 2005

      13 Yan, Zhanying, "On the Harm of Examination-oriented Education" 5 : 11-, 1997

      14 Zhang, Ying, "Measuring the Speaking Proficiency of Advanced EFL Learners in China: The CET–SET Solution" 6 (6): 298-314, 2009

      15 Jin, Yan, "Improvement of Test Validity and Test Washback: The Impact Study of the College English Test Band 4 and 6" 6 : 65-73, 2006

      16 Cheng, Liying, "How does Washback Influence Teaching? Implications for Hong Kong" 11 (11): 8-54, 1997

      17 Li, Xing, "How Powerful can a Language Test Be? The MET in China" 11 (11): 393-404, 1990

      18 Alderson, J. Charles, "Does Washback Exist?" 14 (14): 115-129, 1993

      19 Cheng, Liying, "Changing Assessment: Washback on Teacher Perspectives and Actions" 15 (15): 253-271, 1999

      20 Hughes, Arthur, "Backwash and TOEFL 2000" University of Reading 1993

      21 Chu, Liang-Long, "An Empirical Study of the Washback of CET-4 Writing" 3 (3): 36-38, 2006

      22 Ren, Yonggang, "A Study of the Washback Effects of the College English Test (Band 4) on Teaching and Learning English at Tertiary Level in China" 6 (6): 243-259, 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.25 0.25 0.27
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.27 0.26 0.598 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼