RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      CMF 디자인 제품에 대한 사용자 경험 품질 평가 지표 개발 = The Evaluation Index Development of User Experience Quality on CMF Design Product

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108905680

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The goal of this study is to develop an evaluation index to lay the foundation for a system that evaluates the quality of the user's experience with products to which CMF design is applied. In addition, it is also to develop quantified eval...

      Objective: The goal of this study is to develop an evaluation index to lay the foundation for a system that evaluates the quality of the user's experience with products to which CMF design is applied. In addition, it is also to develop quantified evaluation indicators by analyzing the developed index from the perspective of an actual specific product group.
      Background: A variety of research on the subject of evaluating specific targets is being conducted, and in relation to this, there are many existing studies on product evaluation, evaluation systems, CMF design, and CMF design products. However, there is not much research on the evaluation of experience quality for products with CMF design, which is one of the important elements in the design field.
      Method: A systematic approach was taken by dividing it into two major stages. In the first stage, final indicators were derived from basic data collection as the primary outcome. First, the literature is selected using the PRISMA method based on systematic literature review reporting guidelines, the basic data of the evaluation indicators are collected, the results are organized based on the affinity diagram, and the final indicators are verified through expert review. In the second step, a second affinity method is performed and 22 specific indexes on home appliance are derived, and a fitness analysis is performed on these indices with the CMF design experience quality from the perspective of the kitchen appliance product line, and the results are obtained. An ANOVA was performed on the results to derive final indicators organized by priority.
      Results: In the first step, final indices were derived as the primary outcome. This final indicator has 69 detailed indicators, all of which can be used as evaluation indicators and can be used selectively depending on the evaluation object. In the second step, a secondary affinity method was performed on the primary 69 detailed indicators to derive 22 specific indexes on home appliance, and a fitness analysis of these indicators with the CMF design experience quality from the perspective of the kitchen appliance product line was conducted. Final Specific Indexes on home appliance organized by priority were derived from the results of the evaluation.
      Conclusion: Although there are many existing studies on product evaluation, evaluation system, CMF design, and CMF design products, there is a lack of research on experience quality evaluation of products to which CMF design is applied. Therefore, we conducted a systematic study on this and derived indicators that can be applied in practice and it has meaning as worth studying.
      Application: The indicators for the kitchen appliance product line derived from this study can be selected and immediately applied according to priority when evaluating the quality of the CMF design experience of the product, and can also be selectively applied to other products through an evaluation of suitability with the corresponding product. It has high field applicability in related research and practice.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼