현대 중국어의 정형과 비정형 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There are the concept of finiteness and non-finiteness in languages. some grammatical category exist in a explicit form, some grammatical category exist in a potential form. Italian type language decide them as tense and agreement, verb tense and inflection status are especially an important elements. in case of Chinese, its verb doesn"t be inflected, and then use various elements and syntactic means, it embodies the tense or makes it appear through the semantic category. this paper we suppose there is the concept of finiteness and non-finiteness in Chinese, according to the generation grammar"s theory, we tried to study principles and parameters of them in detail, we came to the following conclusions.
According to Morphological Uniformity Principle, a predicate verb doesn"t be inflected, it is different from Italian type language. verb is only used side by side after being duplicated, and we add postposition or complement behind the verb. we appear tense after using time information marker and several elements. we mainly use time adverb, temporal noun in front of predicate, and we use postposition behind predicate. some sentences don"t use time information marker, they form a sentence, they mean objective truth or the present of things. the standard of judgement are Morphological Uniformity Principle, time information marker status, null subject pro in the finite sentence. pro-drop is the feature of Italian type language, pro appear in the subject position of finite sentences. on the contrary to this, when we judge non-finite sentences, its verb isn"t a major predicate, they don"t have any time information marker. and null subject PRO appear in the subject position of non-finite sentences. the sentence of finite feature have time adverb and temporal noun, they are located in front of predicate, it was used for Adjunct, the Adjunct of finite sentence was added to maximal projection, Adjunct was projected in TP, vP, VP. according to Adjunct Projection Principle, it can"t be added to argument NP or CP. Adjunct is generated in surface structure, it doesn"t need to move position, it is merged into the left in tree diagram, a predicate verb mean action, it is a light verb, it constrains the meaning of predicate verb materialize, we can project this like paper 〈picture2〉. when it is non-finite sentence, null subject PRO appear in front of predicate V, it has same indices with subject.
Time information marker is used for Adjunct, we add postposition behind of predicate verb, null subject PRO is used according to sentence feature, this facts are the sole phenomenon of chinese, it is the parameter of language. we need to modify the definition of finiteness and non-finiteness in generative grammar.the negative color of the latter.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 기존 연구
• 3. 정형과 비정형의 판단 기준
• 4. 정형과 비정형의 통사적 투사
• 5. 결론
• 參考文獻
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장흥석, "현대 중국어 부가어 연구" 중국어문학연구회 (81) : 123-147, 2013

2 이홍배, "최소주의 통사이론과 영어" 한신문화사 1999

3 강명윤, "촘스키 언어학 사전" 한신문화사 1998

4 이홍배, "지배, 결속이론" 한신문화사 1996

5 장흥석, "중국어의 정형(finite)절 연구" 중국어문연구회 (44) : 151-174, 2010

6 장흥석, "연동문의 정형절과 비정형절 연구" 중국어문학연구회 (115) : 139-162, 2019

7 汤廷池, "限定子句與非限定子句" 1 (1): 2000

8 彭家法, "附加语句法语义研究" 安徽大学出版社 2009

9 赵世开, "语言结构中的虚范畴" (1) : 1986

10 程工, "语言共性论" 商务印书馆 1999

11 朱德熙, "语法讲义" 商务印数馆 2005

12 李亚非, "论连动式中的语序-时序对应" (6) : 2007

13 胡建华, "英、汉语空语类的分类、分布與所指比较研究" (5) : 1997

14 徐烈炯, "與空语类有关的一些汉语语法现象" (5) : 1994

15 胡建华, "空语类研究中语法與语用的分工" (2) : 1999

16 温宾利, "當代句法学导论" 2002

17 沈阳, "生成语法理论與现代汉语语法研究" 黑龙江教育出版社 2001

18 戴维 克里斯尔, "现代语言学词典" 商务印书馆 2000

19 李临定, "现代汉语句型" 商务印书馆 1986

20 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" 商务印书馆 1980

21 李京廉, "汉语的限定與非限定研究" (1) : 2005

22 石毓智, "汉语的限定动词和非限定动词之别" (2) : 2001

23 黄衍, "汉语的空范畴" (5) : 1992

24 黄正德, "汉语生成语法" 黑龙江大学 1983

25 黄正德, "汉语正反问句的模组语法" 205 : 1988

26 黄正德, "汉语动词的题元结构與其句法表现" (4) : 2007

27 孟琮, "汉语动词用法词典" 商务印书馆 2000

28 張興錫, "普遍语法原则與现代汉语兼语句研究" 北京师范大学 2008

29 顾阳, "时态、时制理论與汉语时间参照" (4) : 2007

30 登思颖, "形式汉语句法学" 上海教育出版社 2010

31 戴曼純, "廣义左向合并理论" (2) : 2007

32 石定栩, "乔姆斯基的形式句法" 北京语言文化大学出版社 2002

33 Ernst, "The syntax of Adjunct" CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS 2002

34 Chomsky.Noam, "The Minimalist Program" The MIT Press 1995

35 Lin,Tzong-Hong, "Tense in Mandarin Chinese sentences" 18 : 2015

36 Chomsky, N, "Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government Binding" The MIT Press 1981

37 Li,Y.-H.Audrey, "Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese" Kluwer 1990

38 Chomsky.Noam, "On phase" The MIT Press 2005

39 Huang,C-T.James, "On lexical structure and syntactic projection" (3) : 1997

40 Chomsky.Noam, "Minimalist inquiries" (15) : 1998

41 Chomsky.Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" Foris PubliBation 1982

42 JIANHUA HU, "Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese?" 39 (39): 2001

43 Chomsky.Noam, "Generative Grammar" 1987

44 Chomsky.Noam, "Derivation by phase" 18 : 1999

45 Chomsky.Noam, "Beyond explanatory adequacy" The MIT Press 2001

46 Chomsky.Noam, "Barriers" The MIT Press 1986

47 Alexiadou, A, "Adverb Placement" John Benjamins 1997

48 Sportiche, D., "A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure" 19 (19): 1988

49 R. L. Trask, "A Dictionary of Grammartical Terms IN Linguistics" Psychology Press 1993

50 장흥석, "(장흥석의 참 쉬운) 중국어 문법" 글로벌콘텐츠 2019