RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국 현대조각 연구사

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106969274

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper studies history of the research on Korean sculpture after the liberation. In the same manner of analyzing modern art as before and contemporary art as after the liberation in Korean modern and contemporary art history, this paper studies Korean sculpture after the liberation. In fact, a significant development in sculptural works has occurred then. In 1925, when Kim Bok-jin graduated from Tokyo Fine Arts School in sculpture and was actively working as a sculptor, his sculpture began to develop completely different from the traditional one. Instead of functional ones such as Buddhist or tomb sculptures, sculpture as fine art began to emerge as a new genre in Korean art history. In Korean modern days, not only were there just a few sculptors, their works were mostly based on methods such as carving or modeling realistic figures. Therefore, studies on Korean modern sculpture do not exist abundantly. After the liberation, abstract sculpture as well as newly approached sculpture with various methods and materials began to rise. However, a spectrum of contemporary sculpture became very broad that it was difficult to even categorize sculpture as one genre. After three-dimension was developed, its term has been used along with the term sculpture. Also, anti-sculpture became apparent as dimensions being involved and materials becoming diverse, and yet it came to have inseparable relationship with installation art. Although, a boundary between genres became obscure, this paper analyzes various studies on sculpture within art genre in Korean contemporary art history.
      Studies of Korean contemporary sculpture can be classified into before and after the 1990’s while studies before the 1990’s were largely based upon its overview and the secondary element of studies in painting. In 1990’s, scholars of sculpture began to emerge, and studies on characteristics of Korean contemporary sculpture started to expand deeply. Furthermore, objectives and perspectives on research came to accumulate little by little in various ways. This paper seeks the aspects of this phenomenon in detail, and the discussion is organized as follows: first, it overviews the development of Korean contemporary sculpture, and analyzes the studies that achieved concept and terminologies of sculpture. Then it examines into two subject matters, sculpture as fine art and sculpture as public art. The subject of discussion is based on research papers, academic journals, scholarly articles from anthology, and writings from the exhibition catalogue from the National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art covering Korean sculpture after the liberation. The ultimate purpose of this study is to exceed discussions which have been primarily in painting, and to examine Korean contemporary art history in equitable perspectives.
      번역하기

      This paper studies history of the research on Korean sculpture after the liberation. In the same manner of analyzing modern art as before and contemporary art as after the liberation in Korean modern and contemporary art history, this paper studies Ko...

      This paper studies history of the research on Korean sculpture after the liberation. In the same manner of analyzing modern art as before and contemporary art as after the liberation in Korean modern and contemporary art history, this paper studies Korean sculpture after the liberation. In fact, a significant development in sculptural works has occurred then. In 1925, when Kim Bok-jin graduated from Tokyo Fine Arts School in sculpture and was actively working as a sculptor, his sculpture began to develop completely different from the traditional one. Instead of functional ones such as Buddhist or tomb sculptures, sculpture as fine art began to emerge as a new genre in Korean art history. In Korean modern days, not only were there just a few sculptors, their works were mostly based on methods such as carving or modeling realistic figures. Therefore, studies on Korean modern sculpture do not exist abundantly. After the liberation, abstract sculpture as well as newly approached sculpture with various methods and materials began to rise. However, a spectrum of contemporary sculpture became very broad that it was difficult to even categorize sculpture as one genre. After three-dimension was developed, its term has been used along with the term sculpture. Also, anti-sculpture became apparent as dimensions being involved and materials becoming diverse, and yet it came to have inseparable relationship with installation art. Although, a boundary between genres became obscure, this paper analyzes various studies on sculpture within art genre in Korean contemporary art history.
      Studies of Korean contemporary sculpture can be classified into before and after the 1990’s while studies before the 1990’s were largely based upon its overview and the secondary element of studies in painting. In 1990’s, scholars of sculpture began to emerge, and studies on characteristics of Korean contemporary sculpture started to expand deeply. Furthermore, objectives and perspectives on research came to accumulate little by little in various ways. This paper seeks the aspects of this phenomenon in detail, and the discussion is organized as follows: first, it overviews the development of Korean contemporary sculpture, and analyzes the studies that achieved concept and terminologies of sculpture. Then it examines into two subject matters, sculpture as fine art and sculpture as public art. The subject of discussion is based on research papers, academic journals, scholarly articles from anthology, and writings from the exhibition catalogue from the National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art covering Korean sculpture after the liberation. The ultimate purpose of this study is to exceed discussions which have been primarily in painting, and to examine Korean contemporary art history in equitable perspectives.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 한국 현대조각에 관한 개괄적인 논저
      • Ⅲ. 순수미술로서 조각에 관한 연구
      • Ⅳ. 공공조각에 관한 연구
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 한국 현대조각에 관한 개괄적인 논저
      • Ⅲ. 순수미술로서 조각에 관한 연구
      • Ⅳ. 공공조각에 관한 연구
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이경성, "한국현대조각의 상황과 제 문제" 32-37, 1986

      2 윤우학, "한국추상미술40년" 도서출판재원 194-217, 1997

      3 이경성, "한국조각의 근대적 과정" 2 : 49-81, 1970

      4 김이순, "한국근현대미술에서 ‘조각’ 개념과 그 전개" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (22) : 36-53, 2011

      5 김이순, "한국구상조각의 외연과 내포" 15 : 89-116, 2005

      6 김인환, "한국 현대조각의 도입과 전개" 2 : 50-60, 1985

      7 김이순, "한국 추상조각의 형성과 전개" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (37) : 195-223, 2019

      8 김정희, "한국 추상조각의 출현과 전개" 18 : 31-40, 1995

      9 김미정, "한국 산업화시대의 유토피아적 비전" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (20) : 206-227, 2009

      10 조은정, "한국 동상조각의 근대이미지" 9 : 221-267, 2001

      1 이경성, "한국현대조각의 상황과 제 문제" 32-37, 1986

      2 윤우학, "한국추상미술40년" 도서출판재원 194-217, 1997

      3 이경성, "한국조각의 근대적 과정" 2 : 49-81, 1970

      4 김이순, "한국근현대미술에서 ‘조각’ 개념과 그 전개" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (22) : 36-53, 2011

      5 김이순, "한국구상조각의 외연과 내포" 15 : 89-116, 2005

      6 김인환, "한국 현대조각의 도입과 전개" 2 : 50-60, 1985

      7 김이순, "한국 추상조각의 형성과 전개" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (37) : 195-223, 2019

      8 김정희, "한국 추상조각의 출현과 전개" 18 : 31-40, 1995

      9 김미정, "한국 산업화시대의 유토피아적 비전" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (20) : 206-227, 2009

      10 조은정, "한국 동상조각의 근대이미지" 9 : 221-267, 2001

      11 최태만, "한국 근현대 조각에 있어서 서구 모더니즘의 수용과 전개" 17 : 64-82, 1994

      12 최태만, "한국 구상조각의 역사와 계보" 76-81, 2003

      13 김이순, "이념을 위한 공공미술에서 공존을 위한 공공미술로- 한국 공공미술의 패러다임 변화 -" 예술과미디어학회 13 (13): 33-60, 2014

      14 변민재, "소외지역 생활환경 개선을 위한 공공미술 사업 현황 분석 : 2006년 시행된 'Art in City 프로젝트'를 중심으로" 경희대학교 교육대학원 2008

      15 안소연, "설치미술의 국제화 흐름 속 1980-1990년대 한국현대조각의 변화" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (36) : 227-253, 2018

      16 정호기, "박정희시대의 '동상건립운동'과 애국주의: '애국선열조상건립위원회'의 활동을 중심으로" 한국학중앙연구원 30 (30): 335-363, 2007

      17 홍지석, "노무현 정부와 공공미술" 46 : 217-232, 2012

      18 양현미, "건축물 미술장식 제도개선 방안" 문화관광부 2005

      19 최태만, "[단행본] 한국 현대조각사 연구" 아트북스 2007

      20 류다움, "1980년대 한국 형상조각 연구: 인간 조각을 중심으로" 미술사학연구회 (51) : 267-290, 2018

      21 이상윤, "1960-70년대 한국 조각에 표현된 물질성" 현대미술사학회 (17) : 7-33, 2005

      22 김정희, "1950~60년대 한국 생명주의 조각의 제 특성" 현대미술학회 6 : 131-178, 2002

      23 김미정, "1950, 60년대 한국전쟁 기념물 - 전쟁의 기억과 戰後 한국국가체제 이념의 형성" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) 10 : 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-03-23 학회명변경 한글명 : (재)성강문화재단 한국미술연구소 -> 한국미술연구소
      영문명 : Sung Kang Foundation -> Center for Art Studies
      KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-06-29 학회명변경 한글명 : (재)성강문화재단 -> (재)성강문화재단 한국미술연구소
      영문명 : Sungn Gang Culture Foundation -> Sung Kang Foundation
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.84 0.84 0.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.61 0.836 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼