Correlations Between Electrically Quantified Pain Degree, Subjectively Assessed Visual Analogue Scale, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire: A Pilot Study

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective To evaluate the clinical utility of the electrically calculated quantitative pain degree (QPD) and to correlate it with subjective assessments of pain degree including a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ).Methods We recruited 25 patients with low back pain. Of them, 21 patients suffered from low back pain for more than 3 months. The QPD was calculated using the PainVision (PV, PS-2100; Nipro Co., Osaka, Japan). We applied electrodes to the medial forearm of the subjects and the electrical stimulus was amplified sequentially. Minimum perceived current (MPC) and pain equivalent current (PEC) were defined as minimum electrical stimulation that could be sensed by the subject and electrical stimulation that could trigger actual pain itself. To eliminate individual differences, we defined QPD as the following: QPD=PEC−MPC/MPC. We scored pre-treatment QPD three times at admission and post-treatment QPD once at discharge. The VAS, MPQ, and QPD were evaluated and correlations between the scales were analyzed.Results Result showed significant test-retest reliability (ICC=0.967, p<0.001) and the correlation between QDP and MPQ was significant (at admission SRCC=0.619 and p=0.001; at discharge SRCC=0.628, p=0.001). However, the correlation between QPD and VAS was not significant (at admission SRCC=0.240, p=0.248; at discharge SRCC=0.289, p=0.161).Conclusion Numerical values measured with PV showed consistent results with repeated calculations. Electrically measured QPD showed an excellent correlation with MPQ but not with VAS. These results demonstrate that PV is a significantly reliable device for quantifying the intensity of low back pain.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Jensen MP, "The subjective experience of acute pain. An assessment of the utility of 10 indices" 5 : 153-159, 1989

2 Melzack R, "The short-form McGill pain questionnaire" 30 : 191-197, 1987

3 Jensen MP, "The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods" 27 : 117-126, 1986

4 Elliott AM, "The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community" 354 : 1248-1252, 1999

5 Strand LI, "The development of a Norwegian pain questionnaire" 46 : 61-66, 1991

6 Melzack R, "The McGill pain questionnaire: from description to measurement" 103 : 199-202, 2005

7 Hicks CL, "The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement" 93 : 173-183, 2001

8 Melzack R, "Textbook of pain" Churchill Livingston 129-164, 1999

9 Ho K, "Review of pain-measurement tools" 27 : 427-432, 1996

10 Collins WR Jr, "Relation of peripheral nerve fiber size and sensation in man" 3 : 381-385, 1960

11 Stojanovic M, "Quantitative sensory testing in pain states" 2 : 201-205, 1998

12 Lerner TH, "Quantitative sensory nerve conduction threshold (sNCT) evaluation of the trigeminal nerve at the mental foramen area" 84 : 103-107, 2000

13 Verhaak PF, "Prevalence of chronic benign pain disorder among adults: a review of the literature" 77 : 231-239, 1998

14 Kato J, "PainVision" 60 : 1059-1063, 2011

15 Turk DC, "Neglected topics in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: determination of success" 53 : 3-16, 1993

16 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, "National Institutes of Health. Low back pain fact sheet for patients and the public" 18 : 95-110, 2004

17 Katz J, "Measurement of pain" 79 : 231-252, 1999

18 Matsumura H, "Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using ‘the PainVisionTM system’ for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects" 9 : 451-455, 2012

19 Gracely RH, "Evaluation of multi-dimensional pain scales" 48 : 297-300, 1992

20 Bonica JJ, "Domenowske M. The management of pain" Lea & Febiger 1990

21 Patel AT, "Diagnosis and management of acute low back pain" 61 : 1779-1790, 2000

22 Lowe NK, "Confirming the theoretical structure of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in acute clinical pain" 46 : 53-60, 1991

23 Herr KA, "Comparison of selected pain assessment tools for use with the elderly" 6 : 39-46, 1993

24 Boureau F, "Comparative study of the validity of four French McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) versions" 50 : 59-65, 1992

25 Gatchel RJ, "Comorbidity of chronic pain and mental health disorders: the biopsychosocial perspective" 59 : 795-805, 2004

26 McCormack HM, "Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review" 18 : 1007-1019, 1988

27 Rozenberg S, "Chronic low back pain: definition and treatment" 58 : 265-272, 2008

28 Kanai A, "Change of the affected skin temperature in the sub-acute stage predicts the pain intensity and disability in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia" 2012

29 Debono DJ, "Caring for patients with chronic pain: pearls and pitfalls" 113 : 620-627, 2013

30 Maekawa N, "Can we revaluate pain with PainVision, a device for quantitative analysis of perception and pain? A feasibility study of pain in herpes zoster patients" 29 : 824-828, 2009

31 Litcher-Kelly L, "A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical and randomized controlled clinical trials" 8 : 906-913, 2007

32 Fukada T, "A randomised doubleblind crossover trial of the potential analgesic effect of a transdermal nicotine patch in non-smokers based on objective and subjective assessment" 28 : 592-596, 2011

33 Holroyd KA, "A multi-center evaluation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire: results from more than 1700 chronic pain patients" 48 : 301-311, 1992

34 Wewers ME, "A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena" 13 : 227-236, 1990

35 Linton SJ, "A clinical comparison of two pain scales: correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance" 17 : 57-65, 1983