대규모 난민 유입에 대한 국경폐쇄와 인도적 보호 = Border Closures and Humanitarian Protection in Situations of Mass Influx

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Whether neighboring countries can become safe havens is a major concern in case of an armed conflict on the Korean Peninsula. In particular, the question of whether the international law on refugee protection can provide a shield is critical to humanitarian protection to be applied in an armed conflict on the Korean Peninsula when the major
neighboring countries refuse to accept mass refugee influx, especially when they close their borders in order to block any further inflows.
It is not clear whether the right to asylum and the principle of non-refoulement can prevent the first country of arrival from closing its border in situations of mass refugee influx. The right to asylum has not been fully established as the legal rights of asylum-seekers. It is unsettled yet whether the principle of non-refoulement encompasses
the principle of non-rejection at the frontier. As a result, the acceptance of mass refugee influx largely depends on the political and economic interests of the country of arrival.
First, a country of arrival will provide prima facie recognition and temporary protection to a large scale of refugee when it accepts the entry of them. However, it is often limited to minimum humanitarian protection. Second, when a country of arrival undertakes a border closure while maintaining humanitarian considerations, it tends to transfer or evacuate the refugee to a safe third country. A country of destination sometimes even blocks the entry of mass refugees influx outside of its territorial waters and transfers them to a third country in order to prevent it from being
a major destination for refugees. Third, there is an alternative way of providing a safe haven within the country of origin. In this case, the United Nations Security Council declares the mass refugee influx as a threat to the international peace and security in pursuant to the Chapter VII of the UN Charter and authorizes to establish a safety zone as a military buffer zone within the country of origin. However, a safety zone can hardly provide stable humanitarian protection because its establishment itself depends on highly political and volatile interests and results in militarization of humanitarian spaces. Therefore, international law and practices are yet to be fully
established to ensure effective provision of humanitarian protection when neighboring countries close their borders in the event of armed conflicts on the Korean Peninsula.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 무력충돌과 대규모 난민 유입
• 1. 대규모 유입의 딜레마
• 2. 무력충돌시 대규모 유입양태
• 3. 국경폐쇄의 국가실행
• Ⅲ. 국경폐쇄의 국제법적 쟁점
• 1. 비호권의 확립 여부
• 2. 강제송환금지원칙의 제한적 접근
• 3. 강제송환금지원칙의 확대적 접근
• 4. 안전한 국가 개념
• Ⅳ. 대규모 유입사태시 인도적 보호
• 1. 추정적 승인과 임시보호
• 2. 안전한 제3국 이전
• 3. 출신지국 내 안전지대
• Ⅴ. 결 론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정경수, "한국의 고문방지협약상 개인통보절차 수락과 국내적 영향" 민주주의법학연구회 (28) : 61-98, 2005

2 연합뉴스, "중국 해병대, 산둥반도서 한반도 유사시 가정 상륙훈련"

3 신범철, "우리나라 주도의 개입 논리와 대량탈북사태 관련 국제법적 검토" 서울국제법연구원 18 (18): 1-30, 2011

4 연합뉴스, "수면위 올라온 미중 ‘北급변’ 논의…‘깊은 수준 대화하는 듯’"

5 폴 비 스테어즈, "북한 급변사태의 대비" 한국국방연구원 2009

6 중앙일보, "미국인 47%, “올해 북한과 미국 전쟁할 수 있다”"

7 박지현, "난민, 실향민과 국제인도법에 대한 연구" (36) : 90-102, 2016

8 한국경찰연구학회, "김정은 체제의 등장과 북 정세분석 및 급변사태 가능성, 그리고 대량탈북자 발생에 따른 경찰대응방안" 한국경찰연구학회 48-, 2012

9 후지타 히사카즈, "국제인도법" 연경문화사 2010

10 김대순, "국제법론" 삼영사 901-902, 2017

11 이춘근, "“미국의 북한 공격 가능성 51%”… 8가지 변수로 따져봤다"

12 연합뉴스, "[북 6차핵실험] 북한 핵 개발 주요 일지(종합)"

13 Newsweek, "Will the U.S. Go to War With North Korea? Expert Estimates 50/50 Chance of Conflict in 2018"

14 "UNGA Resolution 48/139, UN Doc. A/RES/48/139"

15 "UNGA Resolution 46/127, UN Doc. A/RES/46/127"

16 "UNGA Resolution 45/153, UN Doc. A/RES/45/153"

17 "UNGA Resolution 44/164, UN Doc. A/RES/44/164"

18 "UNGA Resolution 43/154, UN Doc. A/RES/43/154"

19 "UNGA Resolution 42/144, UN Doc. A/RES/42/144"

20 "UNGA Resolution 41/148, UN Doc. A/RES/41/148"

21 "UNGA Resolution 40/149, UN Doc. A/RES/40/149"

22 "UNGA Resolution 39/117, UN Doc. A/RES/39/117"

23 "UNGA Resolution 38/103, UN Doc. A/RES/38/103"

24 "UNGA Resolution 36/148, UN Doc. A/RES/36/148"

25 "UNGA Resolution 35/124, UN Doc. A/RES/35/124"

26 Andorra Bruno, "U.S. Policy on Cuban Migrant: In Brief, Congressional Research Service"

27 Manfred Nowak, "U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" N.P. Engel 2005

28 Thomas Desch, "The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law 397" Oxford University Press 2015

29 Michael Wood, "The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law" Oxford University Press 2015

30 Dieter Kugelmann, "The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law" Oxford University Press 2012

31 "The Haitian Centre for Human Rights et al. v. United States, Case 10.675, Report No. 51/96, Inter-Am.C.H.R.,OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95 Doc. 7 rev. at 550"

32 Nuria Arenas, "The Concept of Mass Influx of Displaced Persons in the European Directive Establishing the Temporary" 7 : 2005

33 Alice Edwards, "Temporary Protection, Derogation and the 1951 Refugee Convention" 13 : 2012

34 The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, "Situation in the Republic of Korea-Article 5 Report" 24-, 2014

35 "Regina v. Immigration Officer at Prague Airport and Another, Ex parte European Roma Rights Centre and Others, [2004] UKHL 55"

36 Erika Feller, "Refugee protection in international law: UNHCR's global consultations on international protection" Cambridge University Press 467-, 2003

37 UN High Commissioner for Refugees, "Protection of Asylum-Seekers in Situations of Large-Scale Influx No. 22(XXXII) - 1981, I-1"

38 UN High Commissioner for Refugees, "No Entry! A review of UNHCR's response to border closures in situations of mass refugee influx" 2010

39 Wikipedia, "MV Tampa"

40 "Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, Application no. 27765/09"

41 UN High Commissioner for Refugees, "Guidelines on International Protection No. 11 : Prima Facie Recognition of Refugee Status"

42 UN High Commissioner for Refugees, "Ensuring International Protection and Enhancing International Cooperation in Mass Influx Situations: Advance Summary Findings of the Study Commissioned by UNHCR"

43 Kathleen Newland, "Cooperative Arrangements to Share Burdens and Responsibilities in Refugee Situations short of Mass Influx" 2011

44 UN High Commissioner for Refugees, "Conclusion on the Provision of International Protection Including Through Complementary Forms of Protection No. 103 (LVI) - 2005, (l)"

45 Human Rights Watch, "Closed Door Policy: Afghan Refugees in Pakistan and Iran" 2002

46 "Chris Sale, Acting Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al. v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc., et al., 509 U.S. 155; 113 S. Ct. 2549;125 L.Ed. 2d 128; 61 U.S.L.W. 4684; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4576; 93 Daily Journal DAR 7794; 7 Fla. Law W. Fed. S 481"

47 UN Human Rights Committee, "CCPR General Comment No. 15: The Position of Aliens Under the Covenant"

48 Janet Phillips, "Boat arrivals in Australia since 1976: Parliamentary Library Research Paper"

49 Global Commission on International Migration, "Beyond the Bounds of Responsibility: Western States and Measuresto Prevent the Arrival of Refugees" 2005

50 UN High Commissioner for Refugees, "Background Note on the Safe Country Concept and Refugee Status"

51 Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, "Access to Asylum: International Refugee Law and the Globalisation of Migration Control" Cambridge University Press 50-51, 2011

52 H, Victor Condé, "A Handbook of International Human Rights Terminology" University of Nebraska Press 205-, 2004