RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      우리말 관형절 갈래와 생김새

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60125941

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is noted in the literature that clausal complex noun phrase constructions in Korean should be divided into four different types; externally headed relative clause constructions, internally headed relative clause constructions, pseudo (or gapless) relative clause constructions and noun complement clause constructions. This paper argues that the externally headed relative clauses in Korean have several peculiar properties, which are incompatible with principles established in the UG. As a by-product, we will see that the Exceptional (Accusative) Case Marking in Korean is another form of the Multiple Accusative Construction of which real internal argument is propositional. As for the internally headed relative clauses, we show that they are not relative clauses in any sense. With regard to the internally headed relative clauses, pseudo relative clauses and noun complement clauses, we claim that it is possible to unify them into a single type of construction.
      번역하기

      It is noted in the literature that clausal complex noun phrase constructions in Korean should be divided into four different types; externally headed relative clause constructions, internally headed relative clause constructions, pseudo (or gapless) r...

      It is noted in the literature that clausal complex noun phrase constructions in Korean should be divided into four different types; externally headed relative clause constructions, internally headed relative clause constructions, pseudo (or gapless) relative clause constructions and noun complement clause constructions. This paper argues that the externally headed relative clauses in Korean have several peculiar properties, which are incompatible with principles established in the UG. As a by-product, we will see that the Exceptional (Accusative) Case Marking in Korean is another form of the Multiple Accusative Construction of which real internal argument is propositional. As for the internally headed relative clauses, we show that they are not relative clauses in any sense. With regard to the internally headed relative clauses, pseudo relative clauses and noun complement clauses, we claim that it is possible to unify them into a single type of construction.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 들어가는 말
      • 2. 밭머리 관계절
      • 3. 안머리 관계절
      • 4. 유사관계절과 명사보어절
      • 5. 맺는 말
      • 1. 들어가는 말
      • 2. 밭머리 관계절
      • 3. 안머리 관계절
      • 4. 유사관계절과 명사보어절
      • 5. 맺는 말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김민국, "핵어명사의 관계화 제약에 대한 연구" 한국어학회 47 : 131-162, 2010

      2 최기용, "한국어 균열 구문의 ‘것’: 빈 NP 채우기로서의 ‘것’" 한국생성문법학회 21 (21): 21-47, 2011

      3 윤재학, "제한과 서술개념에 기초한 유사관계절 분석" 담화·인지언어학회 11 (11): 107-130, 2004

      4 임홍빈, "예외격 표시 구문은 과연 존재하는가" 31 : 95-155, 2006

      5 김용하, "비이동 겹목적어 구문의 구조와 생략의 치유 효과" 대한언어학회 18 (18): 45-65, 2010

      6 Pesetsky, D, "WH In-Situ, Movement and Unselective Binding, In The Representation of (In)definiteness" MIT Press 98-129, 1987

      7 Cha, Jong-Yul, "Type-hierarchical Analysis of Gapless Relative Clauses in Korean" Cornell University 1997

      8 Koopman, H, "The que/qui Alternation: New Analytical Directions"

      9 Bianchi, V, "The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: a Reply to Borsley" 31 : 123-140, 2000

      10 Bhatt, R, "The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: Evidence from Adjectival Modification" 10 : 43-90, 2002

      1 김민국, "핵어명사의 관계화 제약에 대한 연구" 한국어학회 47 : 131-162, 2010

      2 최기용, "한국어 균열 구문의 ‘것’: 빈 NP 채우기로서의 ‘것’" 한국생성문법학회 21 (21): 21-47, 2011

      3 윤재학, "제한과 서술개념에 기초한 유사관계절 분석" 담화·인지언어학회 11 (11): 107-130, 2004

      4 임홍빈, "예외격 표시 구문은 과연 존재하는가" 31 : 95-155, 2006

      5 김용하, "비이동 겹목적어 구문의 구조와 생략의 치유 효과" 대한언어학회 18 (18): 45-65, 2010

      6 Pesetsky, D, "WH In-Situ, Movement and Unselective Binding, In The Representation of (In)definiteness" MIT Press 98-129, 1987

      7 Cha, Jong-Yul, "Type-hierarchical Analysis of Gapless Relative Clauses in Korean" Cornell University 1997

      8 Koopman, H, "The que/qui Alternation: New Analytical Directions"

      9 Bianchi, V, "The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: a Reply to Borsley" 31 : 123-140, 2000

      10 Bhatt, R, "The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: Evidence from Adjectival Modification" 10 : 43-90, 2002

      11 Emonds, J, "The Invisible Category Principle" 18 : 613-632, 1987

      12 Kayne, R, "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" MIT Press 1994

      13 Kang Bosook, "Some Pecularities of Koream KES Cleft Constructions" 60 : 251-281, 2006

      14 Cha, Jong-Yul, "Semantics of Korean gapless relative clause constructions" 29 : 25-41, 1999

      15 Kim, Yong Beom, "Relevancy in Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Korean" 112 : 541-559, 2002

      16 Cha, Jong-Yul, "Relative Clause or Noun Complement Clause: Some Diagnoses" University of Hawai at Manoa 1998

      17 Cecchetto, C, "Relabeling Heads; a Unified Account for Relativization Structures" 42 : 519-560, 2011

      18 Lee, Sun-Young, "Pseudo-Relative Clauses in Korean" Kyoungjin Mwunhwasa 2002

      19 정연진, "Partial Chain Pronunciation at the PF Interface" 한국생성문법학회 15 (15): 433-456, 2005

      20 Chomsky, N, "On WH-Movement, In Formal Syntax" Academic Press 71-132, 1977

      21 장영준, "NP-split, Afterthought, and Counter-countercyclic Merger" 한국언어학회 30 (30): 693-713, 2005

      22 최영주, "Macro-Micro Type Multiple Accusative Constructions Without Movement or Deletion" 현대문법학회 (66) : 243-271, 2011

      23 Choe, Jae-Woong, "LF Movement and Pied-Piping" 8 : 348-353, 1987

      24 Kim, Min-Joo, "Internally Headed Relatives Parallel Direct Perception Complements" Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13-, 2004

      25 Jhang, Sea Eun, "Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Korean, In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IV" Seoul Hanshin 1991

      26 Bianchi, V, "Headed Relative Clauses in Generative Syntax" 6 (6): 197-204, 2002

      27 Zhang, Niina, "Gapless Relative Clauses as Clausal Licensors of Relational Nouns" National Chung Cheng University 9 (9): 1005-1028, 2008

      28 Vergnaud, J. R., "French Relative Clauses" MIT 1974

      29 Kim, Min-Joo, "Formal Linking in Internally Headed Relatives" 15 : 279-315, 2007

      30 Vergnaud, J. R., "Dépendances et Niveaux de Répresentation en Syntaxe" John Benjamins 1985

      31 윤정미, "Double Relativization in Korean - An Explanation Based on the Processing Approach to Island Effects" 한국언어학회 36 (36): 157-193, 2011

      32 Chung, Chan, "Differences between Externally and Internally Headed Relative Clause Constructions" Stanford Univ 2003

      33 Cha, Jong-Yul, "Constraints on Clausal Complex Noun Phrases in Korean with the Focus on the Gapless Relative Clause Construction" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2005

      34 Yang, Byung Sun, "Clause Structure and NP Accessibility of Korean Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Role and Reference Grammar, In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V" Seoul Hanshin 1993

      35 Larson, R, "Bare NP-Adverbs" 16 : 595-621, 1985

      36 Han, Chung-hye, "Are there “Double Relative Clauses” in Korean?" 35 : 315-337, 2004

      37 김용하, "A Case for Ellipsis in Korean: The Non-Movement Multiple Object Construction" 한국생성문법학회 16 (16): 737-772, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar KCI등재
      2005-02-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.48 1.439 0.27
      더보기

      연관 공개강의(KOCW)

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼