RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      An Empirical Study on Management Consulting Models in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107906542

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study empirically analyzed what consulting model has tendency to choose between fact-based model and process-based model and also analyzed which factors management consultants in Korea prefer when choosing consulting models. We concluded that in ...

      This study empirically analyzed what consulting model has tendency to choose between fact-based model and process-based model and also analyzed which factors management consultants in Korea prefer when choosing consulting models. We concluded that in order to create performance on consulting projects, models of management consulting have been developed in a way either fact-based or action-based, not a mixed model. In addition, this study concluded that consulting performance is affected by professionalism, and consulting satisfaction during consulting projects is created by building interaction and trust with customers. Our major findings showed that the impact of professionalism on consulting performance would be higher than that of customer-orientation because consultants are qualified with professionalism. The impact of customer-orientation on consulting satisfaction would be higher than that of professionalism as consultants are qualified with customerorientation. This study, adopting questionnaire used in a precedent study, has a limitation with a view to the majority of respondents group that mostly consists of prospective consultants. In addition to, all of the variables used in the empirical study were collected from one source and this could have been a source of common method bias.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • INTRODUCTION THEORETICAL BACKGROUND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS CONCLUSION REFERENCES
      • INTRODUCTION THEORETICAL BACKGROUND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS CONCLUSION REFERENCES
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼