RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      중국 근로계약법상의 단체협약에 관한 규정 = A Study on the Collective Agreement Provisions in Chinese Labor Contract Law

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims at studying the collective agreement provisions In Chinese Labor Contract Law.
      China's first ever Labor Contract Law was passed on June 29, 2007 by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress and will become effective on January 1, 2008. The legislative intention of the Labor Contract Law, which came out after a series of incidents of severe abuse of workers in China, is to better protect the lawful rights of workers and form a more stabilized employment relationship. A peculiarity of the Labor Contract Law stipulates that both labor contracts and collective agreements will be considered together.
      The Labor Contract Law should be read in conjunction with the Labor Law (1995), the Trade Union Law (1992, amended in 2001) and their respective subsidiary regulations, especially, Provisions on the Collective Agreement (2004 Provisions) issued by the Ministry of Labor and Social Security. There are conflicting problems concerning some regulations and their application.
      The enactment of the Labor Contract Law made a slight improvement in the Chinese collective agreement system as compared with the Labor Law, the Trade Union Law and the Provisions of the Collective Agreement. There are some improvements in the new Law, especially in the field of the main bodies(subjects) of the collective agreement, special field collective agreement, industrial collective agreement, regional collective agreement, the effectiveness of collective agreement and the remedy for rights disputes caused from a result of the implementation of the collective agreements etc..
      There are still some problems in the collective agreement provisions in Chinese Labor Contract Law.
      First Even though the Labor Contract Law emphasizes the principle of equal negotiation in collective bargaining, it is very difficult to achieve it.
      Second Because the Labor Representative Conference in China is organized by both management and labor, it shall not be a party to or shall not be concerned in the collective negotiations on behalf of labor.
      Third In the 2004 Provisions as well as the Labor Contract Law, there is no remedy if an employing unit refuses to start collective negotiations.
      Fourth There are a lack of measures available such as the strike system to secure collective negotiations in China.
      Fifth The Trade Union Law will have to be revised in order to remove the conflict that exists between the Trade Union Law and the Labor Contract Law in the field of dispute settlements relating to the implementation of the collective agreement.
      Sixth The Collective Agreement system IS an important legal method in adjusting labor relationships. However, the Provisions of the Collective Agreement are enacted as a type of Provisions(Guizhang) which is at a lower level of legislation, therefore it cannot rule the collective agreement system effectively.
      Seventh In order to correct the problems due to the conflict among the Labor Contract Law, the Labor Law, the Trade Union Law, the Provisions on Collective Agreement and their application, these Labor Laws should be revised.
      Eighth Because China entered into WTO, it should comply with the basic intention of WTO and the rule of trade, gradually accepting the right of Collective Bargaining as requested by international labor treaties.
      These problems remain as the tasks which China will have to resolve in the near future.
      번역하기

      This paper aims at studying the collective agreement provisions In Chinese Labor Contract Law. China's first ever Labor Contract Law was passed on June 29, 2007 by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress and will become effective o...

      This paper aims at studying the collective agreement provisions In Chinese Labor Contract Law.
      China's first ever Labor Contract Law was passed on June 29, 2007 by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress and will become effective on January 1, 2008. The legislative intention of the Labor Contract Law, which came out after a series of incidents of severe abuse of workers in China, is to better protect the lawful rights of workers and form a more stabilized employment relationship. A peculiarity of the Labor Contract Law stipulates that both labor contracts and collective agreements will be considered together.
      The Labor Contract Law should be read in conjunction with the Labor Law (1995), the Trade Union Law (1992, amended in 2001) and their respective subsidiary regulations, especially, Provisions on the Collective Agreement (2004 Provisions) issued by the Ministry of Labor and Social Security. There are conflicting problems concerning some regulations and their application.
      The enactment of the Labor Contract Law made a slight improvement in the Chinese collective agreement system as compared with the Labor Law, the Trade Union Law and the Provisions of the Collective Agreement. There are some improvements in the new Law, especially in the field of the main bodies(subjects) of the collective agreement, special field collective agreement, industrial collective agreement, regional collective agreement, the effectiveness of collective agreement and the remedy for rights disputes caused from a result of the implementation of the collective agreements etc..
      There are still some problems in the collective agreement provisions in Chinese Labor Contract Law.
      First Even though the Labor Contract Law emphasizes the principle of equal negotiation in collective bargaining, it is very difficult to achieve it.
      Second Because the Labor Representative Conference in China is organized by both management and labor, it shall not be a party to or shall not be concerned in the collective negotiations on behalf of labor.
      Third In the 2004 Provisions as well as the Labor Contract Law, there is no remedy if an employing unit refuses to start collective negotiations.
      Fourth There are a lack of measures available such as the strike system to secure collective negotiations in China.
      Fifth The Trade Union Law will have to be revised in order to remove the conflict that exists between the Trade Union Law and the Labor Contract Law in the field of dispute settlements relating to the implementation of the collective agreement.
      Sixth The Collective Agreement system IS an important legal method in adjusting labor relationships. However, the Provisions of the Collective Agreement are enacted as a type of Provisions(Guizhang) which is at a lower level of legislation, therefore it cannot rule the collective agreement system effectively.
      Seventh In order to correct the problems due to the conflict among the Labor Contract Law, the Labor Law, the Trade Union Law, the Provisions on Collective Agreement and their application, these Labor Laws should be revised.
      Eighth Because China entered into WTO, it should comply with the basic intention of WTO and the rule of trade, gradually accepting the right of Collective Bargaining as requested by international labor treaties.
      These problems remain as the tasks which China will have to resolve in the near future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 「근로계약법」의 제정과 단체협약 관련 규정
      • Ⅲ. 「근로계약법」상의 단체협약 관련 규정의 내용
      • Ⅳ. 향후의 과제
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 「근로계약법」의 제정과 단체협약 관련 규정
      • Ⅲ. 「근로계약법」상의 단체협약 관련 규정의 내용
      • Ⅳ. 향후의 과제
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 윤진기, "한중 단체교섭에 관한 법적 비교" 경남대학교 법학연구소 17 : 2002

      2 윤진기, "한중 노동조합활동에 관한 법적 비교-1997년 현행법규를 중심으로-" 1997

      3 윤진기, "중국의 단체교섭에 관한 법제" 한국노동법학회 (15) : 2002

      4 백권호, "중국의 노동환경 변화에 관한 최근 추세 In: ART001277624" 經濟硏究所人事組織室 2006

      5 정종원, "중국《노동계약법》의 제정과 한국기업의 대응방안" 8 : 2007

      6 王新雨, "集合同行原因析" 15 (15): 2007

      7 史探, "法" 科出版社 1990

      8 王全, "法" 法律出版社 2004

      9 白, "我集合同制度的完善新" 18 (18): 2007

      10 王, "我推行平等商和集合同制度存在及策究" 20 (20): 2007

      1 윤진기, "한중 단체교섭에 관한 법적 비교" 경남대학교 법학연구소 17 : 2002

      2 윤진기, "한중 노동조합활동에 관한 법적 비교-1997년 현행법규를 중심으로-" 1997

      3 윤진기, "중국의 단체교섭에 관한 법제" 한국노동법학회 (15) : 2002

      4 백권호, "중국의 노동환경 변화에 관한 최근 추세 In: ART001277624" 經濟硏究所人事組織室 2006

      5 정종원, "중국《노동계약법》의 제정과 한국기업의 대응방안" 8 : 2007

      6 王新雨, "集合同行原因析" 15 (15): 2007

      7 史探, "法" 科出版社 1990

      8 王全, "法" 法律出版社 2004

      9 白, "我集合同制度的完善新" 18 (18): 2007

      10 王, "我推行平等商和集合同制度存在及策究" 20 (20): 2007

      11 列, "平等商集合同制度" 3 : 2007

      12 主, "工法百答" 中工人出版社 1992

      13 全人大常委法制工作委行政法室, "合同法(草案" 中民主法制出版社 2006

      14 杭宇, "企看如何推企集合同工作" 2 : 2007

      15 信春, "中人民共和合同法" 法律出版社 2007

      16 德强, "“集合同制度的完善”, CHINALABOR, 2007. 10, http://www.chki.net"

      17 "http://www.molss.gov.cn/gb/zxwj/2006-11/08/content_146873.htm"

      18 "http://number.cnki.net/show_result.aspx?searchword=%u96c6%u4f53%u5408%u540c%u4eba%u6570"

      19 "http://ks.cn.yahoo.com/question/1306052702307.html"

      20 Li Kungang, "On the Framework and Problems of the Collective Negotiation in China" 한국노동법학회 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.89 0.82 1.527 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼