RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      원자력안전 거버넌스 경영 사례: 이해관계자 공공참여의 관점에서 = Management Cases of Nuclear Safety Governance: Focusing on Public Participation by Stakeholders

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109610048

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study explores the pivotal role of public and local participation in nuclear safety governance, with a particular focus on France's Local Information Commission (CLI) and the National Commission for Public Debate (CNDP). Drawing on theories such as deliberative democracy, risk governance, and communicative action, the research highlights the critical importance of inclusive stakeholder engagement, transparency, and trust-building in addressing safety concerns and overcoming public resistance against nuclear power energy.
      The CLI and CNDP embody France's commitment to public participation through structured frameworks established under laws such as the TSN Law. These mechanisms facilitate active involvement of diverse stakeholders—including local residents, experts, NGOs, and government representatives—in nuclear policy decisions across the lifecycle of nuclear facilities, from siting and operation to decommissioning and waste management. The study also delves into the democratic practices underpinning these frameworks, such as the theory of public sphere and communicative action by Habermas, which emphasizes rational discourse and public deliberation to achieve legitimacy and consensus in decision-making. Concepts like inclusive risk governance and technical democracy further underline the value of integrating local and expert knowledge to address societal concerns in high-risk technologies like nuclear energy.
      Through an in-depth analysis of France's participatory institutions, the research illustrates how public and local engagement enhance societal trust and acceptance of nuclear technology, despite its inherent risks. Lessons from France provide a roadmap for Korea to strengthen its own nuclear governance, emphasizing the establishment of legally grounded participatory mechanisms, enhanced public communication, and institutionalized local involvement in decision-making.
      번역하기

      This study explores the pivotal role of public and local participation in nuclear safety governance, with a particular focus on France's Local Information Commission (CLI) and the National Commission for Public Debate (CNDP). Drawing on theories such ...

      This study explores the pivotal role of public and local participation in nuclear safety governance, with a particular focus on France's Local Information Commission (CLI) and the National Commission for Public Debate (CNDP). Drawing on theories such as deliberative democracy, risk governance, and communicative action, the research highlights the critical importance of inclusive stakeholder engagement, transparency, and trust-building in addressing safety concerns and overcoming public resistance against nuclear power energy.
      The CLI and CNDP embody France's commitment to public participation through structured frameworks established under laws such as the TSN Law. These mechanisms facilitate active involvement of diverse stakeholders—including local residents, experts, NGOs, and government representatives—in nuclear policy decisions across the lifecycle of nuclear facilities, from siting and operation to decommissioning and waste management. The study also delves into the democratic practices underpinning these frameworks, such as the theory of public sphere and communicative action by Habermas, which emphasizes rational discourse and public deliberation to achieve legitimacy and consensus in decision-making. Concepts like inclusive risk governance and technical democracy further underline the value of integrating local and expert knowledge to address societal concerns in high-risk technologies like nuclear energy.
      Through an in-depth analysis of France's participatory institutions, the research illustrates how public and local engagement enhance societal trust and acceptance of nuclear technology, despite its inherent risks. Lessons from France provide a roadmap for Korea to strengthen its own nuclear governance, emphasizing the establishment of legally grounded participatory mechanisms, enhanced public communication, and institutionalized local involvement in decision-making.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼