한국 사회혁신 생태계 주체별 혁신 단계에 관한 연구: 정부, 사회적 조직, 시장(기업)을 중심으로

국문 초록 (Abstract)

한국의 사회혁신에 있어 정부, 사회적 조직 그리고 시장(기업)은 각자의 방식으로 생태계를 구축해왔다. 정부는 범 정부 차원의 구 정책과 사업을 진행하며 시민에게 지식을 확산시키고자 한다. 본 논문은 Mulgan(2007)과 Murray, Caulier-Grice, Mulgan(2010)에 근거해 한국의 정부, 사회적 조직, 시장 등 각 사회혁신 주체의 역할과 혁신 단계 그리고 생태계를 분석하였다. 심층 인터뷰 분석 결과, 시장(기업)과 사회적 조직은 정부 정책 및 지원사업과 별개의 자발적 사업을 펼치고 역량강화와 투자를 통한 사업 확대를 목표로 하며 선행연구에서 정리된 단계를 순차적으로 밟고 있다. 반면 정부는 지역에서 활동하는 사회적 조직에 재정과 공간 지원을 주로 하며, 혁신의 단계에 역순으로 또는 여러 단계를 동시에 진행하고 있다. 이는 각 주체의 태생적 조직목표와 성격 외에 타조직과의 수평적 교류여부 및 강도에 기인하는 것으로 보인다. 본 논문은 과정을 ① 사회혁신 가능성의 태동, ② 아이디어 실험 및 확인, ③ 프로젝트 성장 및 규모화로 정리하며 ④ 총체적 검증 및 평가 과정을 더해, 주체 간 적절한 협업을 통해 중장기적으로 지속가능하며 상호보완적인 대안을 찾아갈 것을 제안한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In Korea, government, social organization and market(private sector) have been building an ecosystem for social innovation in their own ways. Prior studies on social innovation classify the three entities leading social innovation into government, social organization, and market(private sector), and describe different stages of innovating process. Based on Mulgan(2007) and Murray, Caulier-Grice, and Mulgan(2010), this research analyzes the roles of stakeholders and stages each stakeholder reaches. To do so, we analyze the cases of each actors and activities they carry out to see the relationship and networks they have with each other. We review two different levels of “government” in charge of social innovation: the Ministry of Interior and Safety from the central government level and Seoul Metropolitan Government from the local government level. A “social organization” refers a social enterprise, civic(community) group, and NGO, and in this research, the Hope Institutes and the Circle Foundation are selected as examples. Among the private companies, which are considered as “market,” SK Happiness Foundation from SK Group to promote social contribution and Root Impact are studied. According to the analysis of in-depth interviews, private companies and social organizations voluntarily support various projects independently from government policies and projects, largely through capacity building and financing. On the other hand, the government mainly provides financial and spatial support to social organizations, and is taking stages in reverse order. In other words, social organizations and market are taking steps to social innovation successively, while the government is moving from stage three to one. This research names each stage ① potential of the movement, ② idea experimentation and validation, ③ growth and expansion, and adds ④ holistic verification and evaluation process. We hope this research suggests long term direction to these three main stakeholders to facilitate and cooperate for sustainable development of Korea’s social innovation ecosystem.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 선행연구
• Ⅲ. 연구 설계
• Ⅳ. 한국 사회혁신의 주체별 현황
• Ⅴ. 사회혁신 주체의 단계 및 역할 분석
• Ⅵ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "희망제작소"

2 Kim, Y.-G., "한국의 사회적금융지원제도에 관한 탐색적 연구" 27-31, 2019

3 "영 파운데이션"

4 황혜신, "역대정부와 참여정부의 정부혁신 비교-문민정부, 국민의 정부와의 비교를 중심으로" 2005 : 7-25, 2005

5 박민진, "소셜벤처의 사회혁신 역할 분석" 사단법인 사회적기업학회 11 (11): 3-30, 2018

6 "서울시"

7 정서화, "사회혁신의 이론적 고찰 : 개념의 유형화와 함의" 한국기술혁신학회 20 (20): 888-914, 2017

8 "루트임팩트"

9 "동그라미재단"

10 차재권, "노무현·이명박·박근혜정부 지역혁신체계의 특성과 성과에 대한 비교분석" 21세기정치학회 26 (26): 33-58, 2016

11 Caulier-Grice, "The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe"

12 Cooke, "The Relational State:How Recognising the Importance of Human Relationships Could Revolutionise the Role of the State" 2012

13 Murray, "The Open Book of Social Innovation" 2010

14 Reeder, "Strengthening Social Innovation in Europe: Journey to Effective Assessment and Metrics"

15 Mulgan, G., "Social Invation: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How It Can Be Accelerated" Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, SAID Business School 2007

16 Mumford, Michael, "Social Innovation: Ten Cases From Benjamin Franklin" 2002

17 Goldenberg, "Social Innovation in Canada: How the Non-profit Sector Serves Canadians and How It Can Serve Them Better" Canadian Policy Research Networks 2004

18 European Commission, "Social Innovation as a Trigger for Transformations: The Role of Research" 2017

19 Gerometta, "Social Innovation and Civil Society in Urban Governance: Strategies for an Inclusive City" 42 (42): 2005

20 Gerometta, J., "Social Innovation and Civil Society in Urban Governance : Strategies for an Inclusive City" 42 (42): 2007-2021, 2005

21 The Young Foundation, "Social Innovation Overview: A deliverable of the project: The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe"

22 "SK행복나눔재단"

23 Bund, "Report on Innovation Metrics –Capturing Theoretical, Conceptual and Operational Insights for the Measurement of Social Innovation" European Commission 2013

24 Huddart, S., "Renewing the Future: Social Innovation Systems, Sector Shift, and Innoweave" 2012

25 Yun, J., "Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model" 11 (11): 2019

26 Faber, A., "Innovation Policy for the Environment in the Netherlands and the EU, Innovation Policy in Europe, Measurement and Strategy" 2008

27 Howaldt, "Important Actors within an Ecosystem of Social Innovation" 1 (1): 2016

28 Spruijt, J., "Golden Circle of Innovation—What Companies Can Learn from NGOs When It Comes to Innovation" 99-112, 2013

29 "Fab City Global Initiative"

30 Hubert, A., "Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union" Bureau of European Policy Advisors 2010

31 Yun, "Dynamics of Social Enterprises—Shift from Social Innovation to Open Innovation" 22 (22): 425-439, 2017

32 Yan, Lin, "Cross-Sector Social Partnerships for Social Change: The Roles of Non-Governmental Organizations" 10 : 558-, 2018

33 Franz, "Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society" Springer 2012

34 Sen, P., "Ashoka’s Big Idea: Transforming the World through Social Entrepreneurship" 39 (39): 534-553, 2007

35 Butzin, A., "Actors and roles in social innovation.Atlas of Social Innovation–New Practices for a Better Future" TU Dortmund University 2018

36 서울협치담당관, "2019 지역사회혁신계획 사례서(+1189변화의 협치)"