상품선물 시세조종에 대한 규제 = 현ㆍ선 연계 시세조종을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of the regulation of unfair attitudes at an exchange is to guarantee free and equal competition. A representative one among these unfair attitudes is market price manipulation. The existence of market price manipulation is largely a factual question involving determinations whether the requisite domination or monopoly exists, whether an artificial price is caused by the exercise of that power, and whether the dominant party specifically intended to bring about that artificial price.
Market price manipulation is nothing but the exercise of monopoly power to dictate prices that would be unachievable in a truly competitive environment. The phrase “market price manipulation in commodity futures trading” means the elimination of effective price competition in a market for cash commodities or futures contracts through the domination of either supply or demand. The price manipulation of commodity futures is generally brought out in connection with cash commodities, that is, the underlying assets.
The Capital Market and Financial Investment Service Act(so called “the Capital Market Act”) provides that no one shall commit any attitudes causing fluctuation of or fixing the market price of underlying assets of certain exchange-traded derivatives with the purpose to earn unjust profits from trading such exchange-traded derivatives[Article 176 (4) 1.]. And if anyone violate this provision, criminal or civil sanction shall be imposed to her or him[Article 443 (1) 7 and Article 177].
In this study, the requirements of the price manipulation of commodity futures will be mainly reviewed. Firstly, this study examines closely the meaning of the purpose to earn unjust profits. Secondly, the ability to influence market prices, the intent to do so, and the accomplishment of artificial price will be analyzed. Finally, this study deals with some legal theories relating to cause and result, and damage.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서언
• Ⅱ. 부당한 이익 목적
• Ⅲ. 대상현물 시세의 고정 또는 변동
• Ⅳ. 그 밖의 요건
• Ⅴ. 결어
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 옥기율, "현물 및 선물 연계에 의한 불공정거래행위" 28 : 2001

2 김정수, "현대증권법원론" 박영사 2002

3 한국증권법학회, "파생상품시장 규제체계의 재정립 및 규제 효율화를 위한 연구" 2008

4 신정훈, "파생상품 관련 불공정거래 유형과 규제방안" (95) : 2005

5 류장만, "증권거래법상 시세조종에 대하여" (111) : 2000

6 임재연, "증권거래법" 박영사 2004

7 김건식, "증권거래법" 두성사 2004

8 윤창현, "주가지수선물시장과 현물시장의 상호영향에 관한 소고: 차익거래를 중심으로" (276) : 2000

9 서완석, "자본시장법상의 시세조종행위 규제" 한국상사판례학회 22 (22): 185-246, 2009

10 김홍기, "자본시장법상 파생상품 연계 불공정거래행위에 관한 연구" 법조협회 58 (58): 32-73, 2009

11 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법[주석서 ⅠㆍⅡ]" 박영사 2009

12 국회 재정경제위원회, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률안 검토보고서" 2007

13 국회 법제사법위원회, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 개정법률안 검토보고서" 2008

14 송호신, "시세조종행위에 대한 자본시장통합법의 규제" 한양법학회 (27) : 349-375, 2009

15 김정수, "시세조종 규제의 이론과 실제" (395) : 2001

16 최성근, "선물거래의 공정성확보에 관한 연구" 한양대학교 1995

17 최성근, "선물거래 불공정행위 관련규정의 개선방안 연구" 한국법제연구원 2001

18 榊原一夫, "證券去來法の違反罪, 證券ㆍ金融犯罪" 東京法令出版 1997

19 芝原邦彌, "相場操縱罪における誘引目的, 刑事法學の現代的狀況" 有斐閣 1994

20 木原大輔, "新時代の商品先物去來" 時事通信社 1992

21 神崎克郞, "平成二年商品取引所法改正の槪要" 商事法務硏究會 1995

22 山田廣己, "商品取引所法第152條(相場操縱の刑事責任)解說" 商事法務硏究會 1995

23 河內隆史, "商品取引所法" 商事法務硏究會 1993

24 今川嘉文, "商品先物相場操縱規制" 日本商品先物振興協會 5 (5): 2000

25 提功, "商品先物市場ファイル" 商品先物市場 1994

26 Markham, Jerry W., "The Commodity Exchange Monopoly-Reform is Needed" 48 : 1991

27 Fischel, "Should the Law prohibit “Manipulation” in Finance Markets?" 105 : 1991

28 "Note, Fraud in Commodity Futures Trading-An Examination of the Investor’s Remedies, 34 Vand. L. Rev"

29 Markham, Jerry W., "Manipulation of Commodity Futures Prices-The Unprose- cutable Crime" 8 : 1991

30 Johnson, Philip M., "DERIVATIVES REGULATION" ASPEN 2004

31 Markham, Jerry W., "Commodities Regulation: Fraud, Manipulation & Other Claims, CBC Securities Law Series vol. 13" Clack Boardman Callahan 1993