RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      닉슨-포드 행정부의 한국군 현대화 정책 고찰: 한반도에서의 ‘이중억제’ 전략의 맥락에서 = Evaluation of the Nixon-Ford Administration’s Korean Force Modernization Policy: In the Context of the ‘Dual Deterrence’ Strategy on the Korean Peninsula

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109294108

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper explores the Korean Force Modernization Policy under the Nixon and Ford Administrations within the context of a dual deterrence strategy on the Korean Peninsula. The main objectives of the US strategy were to deter North Korean aggression while preventing South Korea from achieving overwhelming military superiority to maintain regional stability. However, there were significant differences in strategic objectives and calculations between South Korea and the US regarding this modernization policy. While the US aimed to balance deterring North Korea and restraining South Korea’s excessive military buildup, South Korea pursued a self-reliant defense policy to surpass North Korea’s military strength. Theoretically, this case exemplifies the alliance dilemma, illustrating the tension between the patron state’s dual deterrence strategy and the client satate’s pursuit of autonomy in alliance dynamics.
      번역하기

      This paper explores the Korean Force Modernization Policy under the Nixon and Ford Administrations within the context of a dual deterrence strategy on the Korean Peninsula. The main objectives of the US strategy were to deter North Korean aggression w...

      This paper explores the Korean Force Modernization Policy under the Nixon and Ford Administrations within the context of a dual deterrence strategy on the Korean Peninsula. The main objectives of the US strategy were to deter North Korean aggression while preventing South Korea from achieving overwhelming military superiority to maintain regional stability. However, there were significant differences in strategic objectives and calculations between South Korea and the US regarding this modernization policy. While the US aimed to balance deterring North Korea and restraining South Korea’s excessive military buildup, South Korea pursued a self-reliant defense policy to surpass North Korea’s military strength. Theoretically, this case exemplifies the alliance dilemma, illustrating the tension between the patron state’s dual deterrence strategy and the client satate’s pursuit of autonomy in alliance dynamics.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼