Most of researchers have an opinion that Toegye thinks Dosanseodang(陶山書堂) as an perfect place for self-cultivation. When paying attention to Toegye's poetry closely, we can find out that it is necessary to correct the opinion that Toegye recog...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76599639
2009
Korean
KCI등재후보
학술저널
1-34(34쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Most of researchers have an opinion that Toegye thinks Dosanseodang(陶山書堂) as an perfect place for self-cultivation. When paying attention to Toegye's poetry closely, we can find out that it is necessary to correct the opinion that Toegye recog...
Most of researchers have an opinion that Toegye thinks Dosanseodang(陶山書堂) as an perfect place for self-cultivation. When paying attention to Toegye's poetry closely, we can find out that it is necessary to correct the opinion that Toegye recognizes Dosanseodang as an ideal hermitage place for self-cultivation. This assertion is grounded on the lots of lines in Dongjaegamsa(洞齋感事) and Dosanjabyeong(陶山雜詠), in which shows that Dosanseodang is not an optimal place for self-cultivation.
The In-going consciousness in his works becomes more intensive by the order of Dongjaegamsa, 7-syllabic poems of Dosanjabyeong, 5-syllabic poems of Dosanjabyeong. As there is no close relationship between the intensiveness of the in-going consciousness and the actual physical space, it is reasonable to approach to that by way of a concept of layer. In view of the concept, the layer of 7-syllabic poems of Dosanjabyeong is higher than that of Dongjaegamsa, and the layer of 5-syllabic poems of Dosanjabyeong is higher than that of 7-syllabic poems of Dosanjabyeong. Though the layer of 5-syllabic poems of Dosanjabyeong is highest, Toegye does not have a sense of self-contentment. He thinks that by way of reading life, and an outlook of Cheoninhabil(天人合一) and Murailche(物我一體), 'life of spontaneity' can not be accomplished.
Toegye tries to change the recognition on the limitation of the hermitage space. It is shown clearly in intention to reduce the sense of out-going consciousness. However, it can not be said that trial guarantees a success. He considers that his out-going consciousness is not fully reduced in Dosan, and then as an alternative plan for that he comes to take a reading life which is accomplished in the course of 'life of spontaneity'. But, the effectiveness of the reading does not last for a long time. As he has to return to the incomplete hermitage space after the reading, he can not help leading the reading life consecutively. Due to that reason, he can not stop the reading.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 李海英, "李滉 理發說의 意味論的 고찰" 퇴계학연구원 80 : 1993
2 嚴連錫, "퇴계의 자연인식과 도덕적 지향" 퇴계학연구원 111 : 45-106, 2002
3 금장태, "퇴계의 物我觀과 생명의 세계 in: 퇴계의 삶과 철학" 서울대학교출판부 1998
4 權五鳳, "퇴계선생일대기" 교육과학사 1997
5 정병호, "퇴계문학의 현장을 가다" 국학미디어 2008
6 조동일, "시조의 이론, 그 가능성과 방향 설정 in: 古典文學을 찾아서" 文學과知性社 1976
7 宋載邵, "退溪의 隱居와 <陶山雜詠>" 退溪學硏究院 110 : 2001
8 尹絲淳, "退溪의 自然觀" 퇴계학연구원 87 : 1996
9 權五鳳, "退溪의 家學과 사상형성" 退溪學硏究院 68 : 1990
10 이동환, "退溪에게 있어 山水自然美와 道學" 國際退溪學會 2009
1 李海英, "李滉 理發說의 意味論的 고찰" 퇴계학연구원 80 : 1993
2 嚴連錫, "퇴계의 자연인식과 도덕적 지향" 퇴계학연구원 111 : 45-106, 2002
3 금장태, "퇴계의 物我觀과 생명의 세계 in: 퇴계의 삶과 철학" 서울대학교출판부 1998
4 權五鳳, "퇴계선생일대기" 교육과학사 1997
5 정병호, "퇴계문학의 현장을 가다" 국학미디어 2008
6 조동일, "시조의 이론, 그 가능성과 방향 설정 in: 古典文學을 찾아서" 文學과知性社 1976
7 宋載邵, "退溪의 隱居와 <陶山雜詠>" 退溪學硏究院 110 : 2001
8 尹絲淳, "退溪의 自然觀" 퇴계학연구원 87 : 1996
9 權五鳳, "退溪의 家學과 사상형성" 退溪學硏究院 68 : 1990
10 이동환, "退溪에게 있어 山水自然美와 道學" 國際退溪學會 2009
11 金永淑, "退溪詩에 나타난 道學的 性格과 形象" 國際退溪學會 2009
12 權五鳳, "退溪家年表" 退溪學硏究院 1989
13 "退溪全書"
14 鄭錫胎, "退溪先生年表月日照錄(2)" 退溪學硏究院 2005
15 신태수, "退溪 讀書法의 樣相과 志向價値" 우리말글학회 46 : 149-182, 2009
16 "要存錄"
17 郭信煥, "易學과 退溪의 天命思想" 퇴계학 부산연구원 1 : 1995
18 신연우, "<도산잡영>과 <도산십이곡>의 ‘흥’ in: 이황시의 깊이와 아름다움" 지식산업사 2006
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2017-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 신청제한 (등재후보1차) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.23 | 0.24 | 0.507 | 0.02 |