RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘역량’과 역사 교육과정 구성: ‘2015 교육과정’을 중심으로

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article aims to relate translations on the issues of competence in curriculum studies to history education studies. ‘Key competencies in history’ is the fruit of the endeavor to embrace the prospect of the ‘2015 National Curriculum’ into ...

      This article aims to relate translations on the issues of competence in curriculum studies to history education studies. ‘Key competencies in history’ is the fruit of the endeavor to embrace the prospect of the ‘2015 National Curriculum’ into history education. But there are some critiques saying that it is not appropriate to represent the essence of history subject to teachers and students. Why ‘key competencies in history’ could not be a main tool to account for history learning and teaching? I try to find answers in two aspects. First, the school history is abundant in contents and knowledge. It is a challenge to make knowledge in harmony with thinking or skill in history education. When competence coming into history curriculum, similar problems can occur in spite of differences between competence and thinking or skill. Second, the concept of competence is still incomplete and developing. Originating in vocational education and training, competence has not yet optimized to school curriculum. Especially it is fragile in questions of the purpose of education. Examining the concept of competence in ideal type, I try to consider how it can evolve corresponding with history subject and how history education can find the way to be in balance with the concept of curriculum, competence.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 序言
      • 2. ‘역량’과 ‘핵심역량’
      • 3. 역사과 핵심역량
      • 4. 교육적 시사점
      • 5. 結語
      • 1. 序言
      • 2. ‘역량’과 ‘핵심역량’
      • 3. 역사과 핵심역량
      • 4. 교육적 시사점
      • 5. 結語
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼