RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on scar pain in burn patients : A prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107503259

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      <P><B>Abstract</B></P><P><B>Background:</B></P><P>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been used to reduce pain in patients with various musculoskeletal diseases and wounds. We investigated...

      <P><B>Abstract</B></P><P><B>Background:</B></P><P>Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been used to reduce pain in patients with various musculoskeletal diseases and wounds. We investigated the effect of ESWT on scar pain after complete wound epithelialization in burn patients.</P><P><B>Methods:</B></P><P>A prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted from February 2014 to 2015. Forty patients with burn scar pain despite standard therapy (medication, physical therapy, and burn rehabilitation massage therapy) were randomized into ESWT or control (sham ESWT) groups. ESWT was administered at 100 impulses/cm<SUP>2</SUP> (0.05–0.15 mJ/mm<SUP>2</SUP>) once per week for 3 weeks. The treatment effects were assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), pain threshold, Nirschl pain phase system, and Roles and Maudsley scores.</P><P><B>Results:</B></P><P>The characteristics of patients between the 2 study groups were balanced (<I>P</I> >0.05) for age, sex, and total burn surface area (%). In both groups, the NRS, pain threshold (Ib/cm<SUP>2</SUP>), and Nirschl pain phase system values significantly improved (<I>P</I> <0.05) after 3 sessions of ESWT or sham therapy, and there were significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of these 3 variables (<I>P</I> <0.001, <I>P</I> <0.001, <I>P</I> = 0.013, respectively). The Roles and Maudsley scores significantly improved; among 20 patients, 17 reported a score of poor (85%) and 3 reported fair (15%) before ESWT, whereas 3 reported poor (15%), 8 reported fair (40%), 5 reported good (25%), and 4 reported excellent (20%) after ESWT (<I>P</I> = 0.004). The scores did not improve in the control group (<I>P</I> = 0.128).</P><P><B>Conclusion:</B></P><P>ESWT significantly reduced scar pain in burn patients after wound recovery.</P>

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼