In this study, a randomly selected donated property from KB Leading Apartment 50 was examined, and a hypothetical scenario was created, assuming a donation made on January 1, 2023. A case analysis was then conducted to determine the applicable market ...
In this study, a randomly selected donated property from KB Leading Apartment 50 was examined, and a hypothetical scenario was created, assuming a donation made on January 1, 2023. A case analysis was then conducted to determine the applicable market value recognition amount. Subsequently, the suitability of this market value recognition amount was evaluated. The analysis revealed that the property's appraisal value was the highest, followed by the transaction value of similar properties and the auction price of comparable properties, while the apartment house price of the property came last.Based on the study’s findings, it was observed that the apartment house price of the property contradicts the market value principle established by the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act. Furthermore, the adoption of the apartment house price beyond the evaluation period, based on the reporting time, introduces the potential for future changes, raising concerns about legal stability and appropriateness. To ensure equitable taxation, it is advisable to eliminate apartment prices from the recognized market value. However, eliminating the apartment house price from the market value calculation may lead to a higher likelihood of selecting the property's appraisal value. This could potentially increase the tax payment cooperation cost for individuals. As a solution, there is a need to introduce complementary institutional measures can mitigate the cost burden through deductions and other means