RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    양성평등관점에 입각한 법사회화 이론의 비판적 검토 = Critical Review on Theories of Legal Socialization based on Gender Equality

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82675653

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The concept of legal socialization is that the process through which individuals acquire attitudes and beliefs about the law. At this point, These classic theories are admitted generally such as Cognitive Development(Piaget), Moral Development(Kohlberg), Legal Development(Tapp & Levine). In gender aspect, main ideas of these theories are masculine gender is prior to feminine gender in; learning legal knowledges, acquiring legal skills and attitudes etc. Legal developmental theory, however, has been pointed out the faults by some feminism critics such as Chodorow, Gilligan, Noddings. As applying these critics` view, this study was going to clarify the defects of legal socialization theories. the defects of the legal socialization theories can be conceptualized as followings. In gender equality perspective, Legal socialization theories have some limitations; of backgrounds, of applicable coverages, of conceptualizing ``citizenship``, of conceptualizing ``public sphere``, of consistent judgement. It is anticipated that legal socialization theories will be reinforced up and adequate more, thereby being made up the defects the above.
    번역하기

    The concept of legal socialization is that the process through which individuals acquire attitudes and beliefs about the law. At this point, These classic theories are admitted generally such as Cognitive Development(Piaget), Moral Development(Kohlber...

    The concept of legal socialization is that the process through which individuals acquire attitudes and beliefs about the law. At this point, These classic theories are admitted generally such as Cognitive Development(Piaget), Moral Development(Kohlberg), Legal Development(Tapp & Levine). In gender aspect, main ideas of these theories are masculine gender is prior to feminine gender in; learning legal knowledges, acquiring legal skills and attitudes etc. Legal developmental theory, however, has been pointed out the faults by some feminism critics such as Chodorow, Gilligan, Noddings. As applying these critics` view, this study was going to clarify the defects of legal socialization theories. the defects of the legal socialization theories can be conceptualized as followings. In gender equality perspective, Legal socialization theories have some limitations; of backgrounds, of applicable coverages, of conceptualizing ``citizenship``, of conceptualizing ``public sphere``, of consistent judgement. It is anticipated that legal socialization theories will be reinforced up and adequate more, thereby being made up the defects the above.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼