RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Research on the impact of social media influencers of Ganzi on travel intention: focused on the AIDA model = Research on the impact of social media influencers of Ganzi on travel intention: focused on the AIDA model

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16842972

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the tourism industry, advertisers are increasingly exploring support from social media influencers (SMIs) as a strategy to drive positive consumer response. Social media influencers are emerging as central players in media marketing, enhancing destination marketing effectiveness through their own generated messages or message distribution capabilities. Despite the growing interest in SMI, there is still limited understanding of how SMI influences consumers' travel intentions and the value of its marketing. Therefore, this study applied an extended AIDA model to examine the relationship between social media influencer characteristics, destination perceived trust, destination perceived attractiveness and tourist travel intentions. A total of 416 respondents who had watched the Ganzi and Liu Hong short video participated in the questionnaire. Using SPSS and
      Smart PLS, the results showed that social media influencers' similarity, expertise, attractiveness, and authenticity had significant effects on consumers' destination perceived trust, destination perceived attractiveness, and perceived trust and perceived attractiveness are important antecedents of tourists' travel intentions. This paper provides detailed theoretical andmanagerial implications
      번역하기

      In the tourism industry, advertisers are increasingly exploring support from social media influencers (SMIs) as a strategy to drive positive consumer response. Social media influencers are emerging as central players in media marketing, enhancing dest...

      In the tourism industry, advertisers are increasingly exploring support from social media influencers (SMIs) as a strategy to drive positive consumer response. Social media influencers are emerging as central players in media marketing, enhancing destination marketing effectiveness through their own generated messages or message distribution capabilities. Despite the growing interest in SMI, there is still limited understanding of how SMI influences consumers' travel intentions and the value of its marketing. Therefore, this study applied an extended AIDA model to examine the relationship between social media influencer characteristics, destination perceived trust, destination perceived attractiveness and tourist travel intentions. A total of 416 respondents who had watched the Ganzi and Liu Hong short video participated in the questionnaire. Using SPSS and
      Smart PLS, the results showed that social media influencers' similarity, expertise, attractiveness, and authenticity had significant effects on consumers' destination perceived trust, destination perceived attractiveness, and perceived trust and perceived attractiveness are important antecedents of tourists' travel intentions. This paper provides detailed theoretical andmanagerial implications

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • CONTENT
      • ABSTRACT.........................................................................I
      • CONTENT........................................................................III
      • CONTENT OF TABLE..................................................VII
      • CONTENT OF FIGURE..............................................VIII
      • CONTENT
      • ABSTRACT.........................................................................I
      • CONTENT........................................................................III
      • CONTENT OF TABLE..................................................VII
      • CONTENT OF FIGURE..............................................VIII
      • CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...................................... 1
      • 1.1 Background ............................................................................ 1
      • 1.2 Purpose of Study.................................................................... 5
      • 1.3 Research Procedure ................................................................6
      • CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW.......................... 7
      • 2.1 Social Media Influencer(SMIs)........................................ 7
      • 2.1.1 The Definition of SMIs................................................7
      • 2.1.2 The Role of SMIs in tourism..................................... 10
      • 2.2 The characteristics of SMIs..................................................13
      • 2.2.1 The development of SMI characteristics research .....13
      • 2.2.2 The characteristics of SMIs in this study...................15
      • 2.3 Destination Perceived Trust................................................. 22
      • 2.3.1 The Definition of Destination Perceived Trust..........22
      • 2.3.2 Destination Perceived Trust in Tourism Research.... 24
      • 2.4 Destination Perceived Attractiveness...................................26
      • 2.4.1 The Definition of Destination Perceived Attractiveness26
      • 2.4.2 Destination Perceived Attractiveness in Tourism
      • Research...................................................................28
      • 2.5 Travel Intention....................................................................30
      • 2.5.1 The Definition of Travel Intention .............................30
      • 2.5.2 Travel Intention in Tourism Research ....................... 31
      • 2.6 AIDA model.........................................................................33
      • 2.6.1 The Definition of the AIDA Model. .......................... 33
      • 2.6.2 AIDA Model in Tourism Research ............................34
      • CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND
      • HYPOTHESES.................................................................37
      • 3.1 Theoretical Framework ........................................................ 37
      • 3.2 Hypothetical Development...................................................40
      • 3.2.1 The Relationship between Similarity of SMIs and
      • Destination Perceived Trust、Destination Perceived
      • Attractiveness...........................................................40
      • 3.2.2 The Relationship between Expertise of SMIs and
      • Destination Perceived Trust、Destination Perceived
      • Attractiveness...........................................................42
      • 3.2.3 The Relationship between Attractiveness of SMIs and
      • Destination Perceived Trust、Destination Perceived
      • Attractiveness...........................................................43
      • 3.2.4 The Relationship between Authenticity of SMIs and
      • Destination Perceived Trust、Destination Perceived
      • Attractiveness...........................................................45
      • 3.2.5 The Relationship between Destination Perceived Trust
      • and Travel Intention.................................................47
      • 3.2.6 The Relationship between Destination Perceived
      • Attractiveness and Travel Intention.........................48
      • IV
      • CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY...................................51
      • 4.1 Questionnaire Development.................................................51
      • 4.1.1 The Operational Definition of characteristics of SMIs54
      • 4.1.2 The Operational Definition of Destination Perceived
      • Trust.........................................................................56
      • 4.1.3 The Operational Definition of Destination Perceived
      • Attractiveness...........................................................56
      • 4.1.4 The Operational Definition of Travel Intention ................57
      • 4.2 Study Location and Case Background ................................. 58
      • 4.3 Sampling and Data Collection ............................................. 61
      • 4.4 Data Analysis....................................................................... 63
      • 4.4.1 Preliminary Analysis..................................................65
      • 4.4.2 Demographic Analysis...............................................66
      • 4.4.3 The Measurement Model...........................................66
      • 4.4.4 The Structural Model.................................................68
      • CHAPTER 5 RESULTS.................................................. 70
      • 5.1 Demographic Profile ............................................................ 70
      • 5.2 The Measurement Model..................................................... 72
      • 5.3 The Structural Model........................................................... 75
      • 5.3.1 Collinearity assessment..............................................75
      • 5.3.2 Path coefficients and hypothesis verification results.76
      • 5.3.3 R2 and Q2 assessment................................................. 77
      • CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION AND LIMITATION..... 80
      • 6.1 Discussions...........................................................................80
      • 6.2.1 Theoretical Implications............................................ 82
      • 6.2.2 Practical Implications................................................ 84
      • 6.2 Limitations and Future Research ......................................... 87
      • REFERENCE................................................................... 89
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼