Over the past two decades since the National Core Infrastructure legislation was introduced, substantial progress has been made in various related legislations, such as those governing Critical Infrastructure and National Infrastructure, leading to th...
Over the past two decades since the National Core Infrastructure legislation was introduced, substantial progress has been made in various related legislations, such as those governing Critical Infrastructure and National Infrastructure, leading to the development of a more refined legal framework. However, there are still uncertainties regarding the extent of legal completeness embodied in the current definition of National Core Infrastructure. Evaluating how well the objectives of these legislative revisions have been or can be achieved, especially in comparison to existing terms like National Infrastructure, is crucial. This necessity stems from the fact that the legislative process for the National Core Infrastructure was carried out with no discussions on its legal nature or functions at key committees like the Administrative Security Committee or the Legal Affairs and Judiciary Committee. This study aims to scrutinize the objectives underlying the establishment of the National Core Infrastructure Act and identify challenges, limitations, and potential improvements in the current operation of South Korea's National Core Infrastructure legal system.국가핵심기반, 재난안전법, 입법과정, 국가기반시설, 국가기반체계