다양성 존중을 위한 논증 교육의 패러다임 탐색 - 설득적 논증으로부터 성찰적 논증으로의 전환 - = An Exploration of Argumentation Educational Paradigms that Respect Diversity - The transition from persuasive argumentation to reflective argumentation -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aimed to overview theories of reflective argumentation and explore methods that support teaching and learning. Reflective argumentation is an alternative paradigm that demonstrates the dialogic and dialectical nature of the argument through two-sided reasoning that weighs and synthesizes differences in diverse positions. A transition to reflective argumentation can contribute to resolving confirmation bias (from persuasive argumentation) and respecting diversity by acknowledging and responding to alternative positions. We proposed the following methods that support teaching and learning: multiple documents, graphic representational tools, explicit instruction in strategies with modeling, and collaborative discourse.
This study is meaningful in that it points out the problems of existing education developed mainly based on persuasive argumentation (e.g., debate, refutation) and proposes an alternative paradigm that demonstrates the nature of argumentation. Focusing on the gap between social and cognitive approaches to argumentation and considering various responses to different positions would deepen the understanding of argumentation, a complex communicative activity in which comprehension, expression, and learning are intertwined.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장성민, "학습 목적 글쓰기 교육에 대한 반성적 검토 - 2015 국어과 교육과정의 성취기준 분석을 중심으로 -" 한국어교육학회 (155) : 63-106, 2016

2 이영호, "학습 논술 교육 연구 : 학습 과정에서의 논증 능력을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

3 이선영, "토론의 논증 구성과 사회적 상호작용에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2002

4 Edwards, R. E., "토론, 어떻게 하는가: 경쟁적 토론을 위한 공식 가이드" 사회평론 2019

5 장지혜, "탐구적 쓰기로서 가치 논제 글쓰기의 특성 고찰 - 고등학생 필자의 논증 양상 분석을 중심으로 -" 한국어교육학회 (167) : 89-119, 2019

6 유상희, "지식 탐구의 도구로서 논증적 글쓰기에 대한 고찰- CCSS 범교과 문식성 영역을 중심으로 -" 한국작문학회 (32) : 83-116, 2017

7 김정탁, "예(禮)와 예(藝): 한국인의 의사소통" 한울 2004

8 양치구, "역사교육에서 비판적 사고력 증진을 위한 논증적 글쓰기 전략의 개발"

9 최현섭, "상생화용, 새로운 의사소통 탐구" 커뮤니케이션북스 2007

10 천경록, "사회적 독서와 비판적 문식성에 대한 고찰" 한국국어교육학회 (101) : 7-35, 2014

11 朴鍾勳, "메타커뮤니케이션의 분석을 통한 국어 교수-학습 내용 탐구 : 소집단 토론 담화를 중심으로" 서울大學校 大學院 1996

12 송치순, "담화 통합 활동을 통한 논증적 글쓰기 교육 연구" 서울대학교 일반대학원 2013

13 서민주, "논증활동에서 나타나는 통계적 추론의 수준 상승에 대한 분석 : 반박(Rebuttal)을 중심으로" 서울대학교 일반대학원 2018

14 임지원, "논증적 글쓰기에서 반론 통합 교수학습 방안 연구" 서울대학교 일반대학원 2019

15 Williams, J. M., "논증의 탄생" 홍문관 2008

16 Freeley, A. J., "논증과 토론: 합리적 의사 결정을 위한 비판적 사고" 사회평론 2018

17 민병곤, "논증 교육의 내용 연구 : 6, 8, 10학년 학습자의 작문 및 토론 분석을 바탕으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2004

18 유상희, "논증 교육을 위한 합리성 개념 고찰" 한국독서학회 (44) : 204-239, 2017

19 Toulmin, S., "논변의 사용" 고려대학교 출판부 2006

20 김희백, "과학 논변활동을 위한 반응적 교수" 북스힐 2019

21 장성민, "고등학생 필자의 다문서 읽기를 통한 작문 과제 수행에 관한 연구" 한국작문학회 (25) : 191-225, 2015

22 Graham, S., "Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools" Carnegie Corporation 2007

23 Nash, J. G., "Writing from sources : A structure-mapping model" 85 : 159-170, 1993

24 Wiley, J., "Writing as a learning activity" Brill 120-148, 2014

25 Segev-Miller, R., "Writing and cognition: Research and applications" Elsevier 231-250, 2007

26 Raedts, M., "Writing and Motivation" Elsevier 219-238, 2007

27 Mercer, N., "Words and minds: How we use language to think together" Routledge 2000

28 Nussbaum, E. M., "Using argumentation vee diagrams(AVDs)for promoting argument-counterargument integration in reflective writing" 100 (100): 549-565, 2008

29 Schwarz, B., "Two wrongs may make a right... If they argue together!" 18 : 461-494, 2000

30 Van Gelder, T., "The rationale for rationale" 6 : 23-42, 2007

31 Bereiter, C., "The psychology of written composition" Erlbaum 1987

32 Leitão, S., "The potential of argument in knowledge building" 43 : 323-360, 2000

33 Walton, D. N., "The new dialectic" Pennsylvania State University Press 1999

34 Asterhan, C. S., "The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory" 99 (99): 626-639, 2007

35 Nussbaum, E. M., "The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing" 97 : 157-169, 2005

36 Gilabert, S., "The effect of task instructions on students’ use of repetition in argumentative discourse" 35 (35): 2857-2878, 2013

37 Garcia-Mila, M., "The effect of argumentative task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse" 97 (97): 497-523, 2013

38 Klein, P. D., "The Effects of Discussion and Persuasion Writing Goals on Reasoning, Cognitive Load, and Learning" 61 (61): 40-64, 2015

39 Song, Y., "Teaching critical questions about argumentation through the revision process : Effects of strategy instruction on college students’ argumentative essays" 26 (26): 67-90, 2013

40 Lu, J., "Supporting medical decision making with argumentation tools" 33 (33): 425-442, 2008

41 Salas, E., "Special issue preface" 22 : 87-88, 2001

42 Fischer, F., "Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives" Springer 2007

43 Van Amelsvoort, M., "Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning : How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams" 16 (16): 485-552, 2007

44 Petraglia, J., "Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education" Erlbaum 1998

45 Nussbaum, E. M., "Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students' writing" 76 (76): 59-92, 2007

46 Braaksma, M. A. H., "Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes" 22 : 1-36, 2004

47 Hartman, D. K., "Lively Discussions!Fostering Engaged Reading" IRA 106-133, 1996

48 Mateos, M., "Learning paths in synthesis writing : Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome?" 48 : 137-157, 2020

49 Mallin, I., "Inviting constructive argument" 36 : 120-133, 2000

50 Gebril, A., "Investigating source use, discourse features, and process in integrated writing tests" 7 : 47-84, 2009

51 Lewkowicz, J. A., "Investigating authenticity in language testing" University of Lancaster 1997

52 Solé, I., "Integrating information : An analysis of the processes involved and the products generated in a written synthesis task" 30 : 63-90, 2013

53 Mateos, M., "Improving written argumentative synthesis by teaching the integration of conflicting information from multiple sources" 36 (36): 119-138, 2018

54 Van Amelsvoort, M., "How number and size of text boxes in argument diagrams affect opinions" 57 : 57-70, 2018

55 Santangelo, T., "Handbook of writing research" Guilford Press 174-193, 2016

56 Lampert, M. L., "Handbook of human development in education" Blackwell 731-764, 1996

57 Van Eemeren, F. H., "Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments" Routledge 1996

58 Ciecierski, L., "Experiencing intertextuality through authentic literature and meaningful writing in the middle school content area classroom" Kent State University 2014

59 Britt, M. A., "Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes" Cambridge University Press 276-314, 2012

60 Janssen, J., "Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning" 38 : 59-88, 2010

61 Chiu, M. M., "Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity : Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students’ collaborative problem solving" 33 (33): 382-402, 2008

62 Kuhn, D., "Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking" 22 : 545-552, 2011

63 Bell, P., "Designing for students’ conceptual change in science using argumentation and classroom debate" University of California at Berkeley 1998

64 Felton, M., "Deliberation versus dispute : The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom" 29 (29): 417-446, 2009

65 Pollock, J. L., "Defeasible reasoning" 11 : 481-518, 1987

66 Nussbaum, E. M., "Critical questions and argument stratagems : A framework for enhancing and analyzing students' reasoning practices" 20 (20): 443-488, 2011

67 Nussbaum, E. M., "Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning : Preface and literature review" 33 (33): 345-359, 2008

68 Ferreti, R. P., "Best practices in writing instruction" Guilford 113-140, 2013

69 Paolucci, M., "Belvédère: Stimulating students’critical discussion" ACM 123-124, 1995

70 Weigle, S. C., "Assessing writing" Cambridge University Press 2001

71 Andrews, R., "Argumentation in higher education: Improving practice through theory and research" Routledge 2010

72 Kiili, C., "Argument graph as a tool for promoting collaborative online reading" 29 : 248-259, 2012

73 Kroll, B. M., "Arguing differently" 5 (5): 37-60, 2005

74 Reed, C., "Araucaria : Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation" 13 : 961-979, 2004

75 Nussbaum, E. M., "Appropriate appropriation : Functionality of student arguments and support requests during small-group classroom discussions" 34 : 501-544, 2003