RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      GCB/NH2 이중층고체상추출을 이용한 농약잔류 다성분동시분석법의 정제 효율 평가

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11609163

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        대전 : 忠南大學校 大學院, 2009

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        2009

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • DDC

        631.8 판사항(22)

      • 발행국(도시)

        대전

      • 기타서명

        Evaluation of clean-up efficiency using GCB/NH2 dual-layer solid-phase extraction in multiresidue pesticide analysis

      • 형태사항

        v, 55p : 도표 ; 26cm.

      • 일반주기명

        충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
        지도교수:李奎承
        참고문헌: p.48-51

      • 소장기관
        • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The efficiency of dual-layer solid-phase extraction(graphitized carbon/NH2 SPE), sorbents characterized by different mechanisms of sorption, was evaluated in view of sample clean-up procedure of multiresidue method(MRM).
      Individually graphitized carbon block(GCB) and aminopropyl(NH2) SPE were evaluated with several clean-up solvent systems. Suitable elution solvents were selected toluene for GCB SPE and acetone, ethylacetate for NH2 SPE. Then selected solvents were mixed to various ratio and tested as a GCB/NH2 dual-layer SPE eluent.
      Suitable elution solvents for 40 pesticides with a wide range of polarity were studied 65% ethyl acetate/toluene, 70% acetone/toluene. Two solvents were compared in clean-up for lettuce. As a result, 65% ethyl acetate/toluene was showed more efficiency to remove sample matrix and selected most appropriate elution solvent for clean-up of GCB/NH2 dual-layer SPE.
      The solvent of 65% ethyl acetate/toluene was showed over 90% of recovery in almost pesticides, but some polar pesticides such as clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and carbendazim were eluted insufficiently.
      And cymoxanil, pyroquilon, thiacloprid and boscalid were affected by matrix co-extractives in low level test. Nevertheless, these pesticides also showed 90~110% recovery reducing the affection of co-extractives of sample matrix by HPLC/MS analysis.
      번역하기

      The efficiency of dual-layer solid-phase extraction(graphitized carbon/NH2 SPE), sorbents characterized by different mechanisms of sorption, was evaluated in view of sample clean-up procedure of multiresidue method(MRM). Individually graphitized car...

      The efficiency of dual-layer solid-phase extraction(graphitized carbon/NH2 SPE), sorbents characterized by different mechanisms of sorption, was evaluated in view of sample clean-up procedure of multiresidue method(MRM).
      Individually graphitized carbon block(GCB) and aminopropyl(NH2) SPE were evaluated with several clean-up solvent systems. Suitable elution solvents were selected toluene for GCB SPE and acetone, ethylacetate for NH2 SPE. Then selected solvents were mixed to various ratio and tested as a GCB/NH2 dual-layer SPE eluent.
      Suitable elution solvents for 40 pesticides with a wide range of polarity were studied 65% ethyl acetate/toluene, 70% acetone/toluene. Two solvents were compared in clean-up for lettuce. As a result, 65% ethyl acetate/toluene was showed more efficiency to remove sample matrix and selected most appropriate elution solvent for clean-up of GCB/NH2 dual-layer SPE.
      The solvent of 65% ethyl acetate/toluene was showed over 90% of recovery in almost pesticides, but some polar pesticides such as clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and carbendazim were eluted insufficiently.
      And cymoxanil, pyroquilon, thiacloprid and boscalid were affected by matrix co-extractives in low level test. Nevertheless, these pesticides also showed 90~110% recovery reducing the affection of co-extractives of sample matrix by HPLC/MS analysis.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법 7
      • 1. 실험재료 7
      • 1.1 대상 시료 및 조제 7
      • 1.2 시약 7
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법 7
      • 1. 실험재료 7
      • 1.1 대상 시료 및 조제 7
      • 1.2 시약 7
      • 1.2.1 실험 대상 농약 성분 7
      • 1.2.2 시약 13
      • 1.3 고체상추출 및 기기분석 13
      • 1.3.1 고체상추출(SPE) 13
      • 1.3.2 분석장비 13
      • 1.3.2.1 HPLC/UVD 분석조건 13
      • 1.3.2.2 HPLC/FLD 분석조건 14
      • 1.3.2.3 HPLC/MSD 분석조건 15
      • 2. 실험방법 17
      • 2.1 전처리분석법 정립 17
      • 2.1.1 시료 전처리 방법 17
      • 2.1.2 이중층고체상추출 정제방법 17
      • 2.1.2.1 GCB, NH₂ SPE 단일 용출용매 17
      • 2.1.2.2 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 혼합용출용매 18
      • 2.1.2.3. GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 혼합용출용매의 정제효율 비교 18
      • 2.1.3 다양한 시료 별 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 정제효율 18
      • 2.1.4 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상의 정제 회수율 19
      • 2.2 HPLC/MS를 이용한 matrix effect 제거 19
      • 2.2.1 개별 농약 성분의 이온 선정 19
      • 2.2.2 선택이온(SIM) 분석법을 이용한 시료 불순물 제거 20
      • Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰 21
      • 1. 전처리 분석법 정립 21
      • 1.1 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 용출용매 선발 21
      • 1.1.1 GCB, NH₂ SPE 단일 용출용매 선발 21
      • 1.1.2 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 혼합 용출용매 선발 26
      • 1.1.3 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 혼합 용출용매의 정제효율 비교 31
      • 1.2 시료에 따른 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상 정제효율 34
      • 1.3 GCB/NH₂ 이중층고체상의 정제 회수율 37
      • 2. HPLC/MS를 이용한 matrix effect 감소 42
      • 2.1 개별 농약 성분의 이온 선정 42
      • 2.2 HPLC/MS를 이용한 matrix effect 감소 44
      • Ⅳ. 결론 46
      • Ⅴ. 참고문헌 48
      • ABSTRACT 52
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼