A Web-Based Global Educational Model for Training in Semen Analysis during the COVID-19 Pandemic

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Center for Reproductive Medicine (ACRM) transitioned its annual training in assisted reproductive technology (ART) from a hands-on, laboratory-based training course to a fully online training endorsed by the American College of Embryology. Here we describe our experience and assess the quality of an online training format based on participant outcomes for the first three modules of a planned series of online ART training.
Materials and Methods: These modules included manual semen analysis, sperm morphology and ancillary semen tests (testing for leukocytospermia, sperm vitality, and anti-sperm antibody screening). The virtual format consisted of lecture presentations featuring laboratory protocols with corresponding video demonstrations of routine techniques and best practices. Practical scenarios, troubleshooting, and clinical interpretation of laboratory results were also discussed. At the end of each module, an optional multiple choice question test was held as a prerequisite to obtain certification on the topics presented. Course quality was assessed using participant responses collected via online surveys.
Results: The digital delivery methods used were found to have largely or completely met the participants’ expectations for all questions (>85%). The majority (>87%) of the participants either strongly agreed or agreed that the course content was well-structured with appropriate depth, and that their overall expectations of the course had been met.
Conclusions: This training format appears to be a realistic teaching option to freely share highly specialized expertise and technical knowledge with participants from anywhere in the world with varying levels of competency or experience.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Cooper TG, "World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics" 16 : 231-245, 2010

2 World Health Organization (WHO), "WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed"

3 Donkin R, "Video feedback and e-Learning enhances laboratory skills and engagement in medical laboratory science students" 19 : 310-, 2019

4 Latif MZ, "Use of smart phones and social media in medical education:trends, advantages, challenges and barriers" 27 : 133-138, 2019

5 Tomlinson MJ, "Uncertainty of measurement and clinical value of semen analysis: has standardisation through professional guidelines helped or hindered progress?" 4 : 763-770, 2016

6 de Ziegler D, "Training in reproductive endocrinology and infertility and assisted reproductive technologies : options and worldwide needs" 104 : 16-23, 2015

7 Seery MK, "The implementation of pre-lecture resources to reduce in-class cognitive load : a case study for higher education chemistry" 43 : 667-677, 2012

8 Olson TM, "The effectiveness of web-based instruction : an initial inquiry" 3 : 1-17, 2002

9 Bates AW, "Teaching in a digital age: guidelines for designing teaching and learning" Tony Bates Associates Ltd 2019

10 Franken DR, "Semen analysis and sperm function testing" 14 : 6-13, 2012

11 Comhaire F, "Methodological aspects of sperm morphology evaluation : comparison between strict and liberal criteria" 62 : 857-861, 1994

12 Sun L, "Knowledge construction in e-learning:designing an e-learning environment" 111-118, 2003

13 Keel BA, "How reliable are results from the semen analysis?" 82 : 41-44, 2004

14 National Center for Education Statistics, "How is grade point average calculated?" Institute of Education Sciences

15 Martinez GM, "Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2011-2015" 113 : 1-17, 2018

16 Kember D, "Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires" 33 : 341-353, 2008

17 Baskaran S, "Diagnostic value of routine semen analysis in clinical andrology" 53 : e13614-, 2021

18 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, "Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion" 103 : e18-e25, 2015

19 Sikka SC, "Current updates on laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of male reproductive failure" 18 : 392-401, 2016

20 Meisters J, "Controlling social desirability bias: an experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model" 15 : e0243384-, 2020

21 Young JQ, "Cognitive load theory: implications for medical education: AMEE guide no. 86" 36 : 371-384, 2014

22 Esteves SC, "Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination" 40 : 443-453, 2014

23 Wang C, "Association between medical students' prior experiences and perceptions of formal online education developed in response to COVID-19: a crosssectional study in China" 10 : e041886-, 2020

24 Sharlip ID, "American Urological Association. Vasectomy:AUA guideline" 188 (188): 2482-2491, 2012

25 Agarwal A, "A unique view on male infertility around the globe" 13 : 37-, 2015

26 Franken DR, "A continuous quality control program for strict sperm morphology" 74 : 721-724, 2000