RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A Study on the Overseas Voting System through Korean Voter’s Thoughts and Attitudes in LA, Orange County

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      An overseas election system was in fact introduced earlier in Korean history (1966). However, it was abolished and fundamental principles of democracy were largely ignored by authoritarian regimes for a long time before recent steps were taken toward their reinstatement. However, due to the rather abrupt reinstatement of overseas voting procedures, there are numerous legal loopholes to be found in the current overseas election system.
      Since revising the Public Official Election Act of February 2009, many bills have been proposed at the National Assembly to revise legislation and correct imperfections in the overseas election system. Moreover, many in Korean academia are currently engaged in active discussion and the essence of their discussions regards the means to promote an increase in the voting rate and ensure fairness. While the issues of ensuring adequate participation and fairness cannot be addressed by a simplistic application of popular sovereignty doctrine, there is certainly an implication here of urgent legislative tasks which must be addressed.
      In this respect, this research is a survey and an analysis of the consciousness and attitudes of Korean citizens living abroad on the topic of election participation and fair election management, from the perspective of the institutional theory of election that election systems affect voting behaviors. Moreover, based on findings of empirical studies that the behavior of voters influences election results and thus ultimately brings about changes in election systems, this research will identify problems in the current overseas election system and immediate tasks to be dealt with by leveraging the empirical analysis of the survey on the consciousness and attitude of overseas Koreans on election.
      It should be noted that in the end the rate of participation is largely determined by the basic attitude and consciousness of the voters regarding elections. To precisely understand these attitudes, the following questions were asked during our survey, which are related to the voters’ sense of obligation to vote; belief in the efficacy of overseas voting; consciousness of one’s sovereignty; intent to participate in the vote; reason for abstention where applicable and criteria of choosing a candidate:
      Fair election management is also largely dependent on the attitudes of voters about unfair elections, along with institutional and environmental factors. To understand the thoughts and attitudes of Korean overseas voters regarding fair elections, interviewers asked the following questions associated with the respondents’ perception of election wrongdoing, willingness to participate in the election process and activities, intended reactions when experiencing illegal campaign practices and awareness of the types of illegal campaign practices:
      To analyze the pending issues in the overseas election system, this study examined two areas, highlighting overseas Korean citizens’ preferences of voting methods and the preferred areas of suffrage extension.
      Numerous initiatives are called for: first, a legislative revision bill already proposed at the National Assembly that would allow voting by mail and increase the number of voting places in foreign countries; second, legislative measures which were omitted in earlier legislative revisions made in response to the Constitutional Court’s 2007 ruling, to allow the application of overseas election to referendums and absentee voting for sailors. Additionally, institutional measures that need to be addressed as quickly as possible include the introduction of public management of election campaigns in overseas elections, the introduction of a semipermanent list of overseas voters and implementing educational programs for overseas elections.
      Mid- to long-term legislative tasks would include granting voting rights to holders of dual nationalities, allocating seats in the National Assembly for overseas Korean communities (
      번역하기

      An overseas election system was in fact introduced earlier in Korean history (1966). However, it was abolished and fundamental principles of democracy were largely ignored by authoritarian regimes for a long time before recent steps were taken toward ...

      An overseas election system was in fact introduced earlier in Korean history (1966). However, it was abolished and fundamental principles of democracy were largely ignored by authoritarian regimes for a long time before recent steps were taken toward their reinstatement. However, due to the rather abrupt reinstatement of overseas voting procedures, there are numerous legal loopholes to be found in the current overseas election system.
      Since revising the Public Official Election Act of February 2009, many bills have been proposed at the National Assembly to revise legislation and correct imperfections in the overseas election system. Moreover, many in Korean academia are currently engaged in active discussion and the essence of their discussions regards the means to promote an increase in the voting rate and ensure fairness. While the issues of ensuring adequate participation and fairness cannot be addressed by a simplistic application of popular sovereignty doctrine, there is certainly an implication here of urgent legislative tasks which must be addressed.
      In this respect, this research is a survey and an analysis of the consciousness and attitudes of Korean citizens living abroad on the topic of election participation and fair election management, from the perspective of the institutional theory of election that election systems affect voting behaviors. Moreover, based on findings of empirical studies that the behavior of voters influences election results and thus ultimately brings about changes in election systems, this research will identify problems in the current overseas election system and immediate tasks to be dealt with by leveraging the empirical analysis of the survey on the consciousness and attitude of overseas Koreans on election.
      It should be noted that in the end the rate of participation is largely determined by the basic attitude and consciousness of the voters regarding elections. To precisely understand these attitudes, the following questions were asked during our survey, which are related to the voters’ sense of obligation to vote; belief in the efficacy of overseas voting; consciousness of one’s sovereignty; intent to participate in the vote; reason for abstention where applicable and criteria of choosing a candidate:
      Fair election management is also largely dependent on the attitudes of voters about unfair elections, along with institutional and environmental factors. To understand the thoughts and attitudes of Korean overseas voters regarding fair elections, interviewers asked the following questions associated with the respondents’ perception of election wrongdoing, willingness to participate in the election process and activities, intended reactions when experiencing illegal campaign practices and awareness of the types of illegal campaign practices:
      To analyze the pending issues in the overseas election system, this study examined two areas, highlighting overseas Korean citizens’ preferences of voting methods and the preferred areas of suffrage extension.
      Numerous initiatives are called for: first, a legislative revision bill already proposed at the National Assembly that would allow voting by mail and increase the number of voting places in foreign countries; second, legislative measures which were omitted in earlier legislative revisions made in response to the Constitutional Court’s 2007 ruling, to allow the application of overseas election to referendums and absentee voting for sailors. Additionally, institutional measures that need to be addressed as quickly as possible include the introduction of public management of election campaigns in overseas elections, the introduction of a semipermanent list of overseas voters and implementing educational programs for overseas elections.
      Mid- to long-term legislative tasks would include granting voting rights to holders of dual nationalities, allocating seats in the National Assembly for overseas Korean communities (

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박상철, "한국정치법학론" 리북 2008

      2 중앙선거관리위원회, "정치발전에 기여하는 참여중심의 민주시민교육" 2006

      3 중앙선거관리위원회, "재외선거에 관한 여론조사" 2007

      4 정의용, "재외국민에 대한 선거권 부여 문제 요지" 해외교포문제연구소 2005

      5 이종훈, "재외국민 참정권 문제 : 해외 부재자 투표 제도 재도입 방향" 해외교포문제연구소 2002

      6 정상우, "재외국민 선거권에 관한 헌법재판소 결정의 의미와 입법과제" 한국법제연구원 2007

      7 정극원, "재외국민 선거권부여와 공직선거법 개정안에 관한 검토" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 549-570, 2009

      8 정근식, "이중국적을 보는 사회적 시각, in 이중국적에 관한 법리적 검토" 법무부 2004

      9 조진만, "선거제도의 변화와 17대 총선" 한국학술정보 2006

      10 김현태, "선거운동의 자유와 공정에 관한 연구" 경기대학교 정치전문대학원 2007

      1 박상철, "한국정치법학론" 리북 2008

      2 중앙선거관리위원회, "정치발전에 기여하는 참여중심의 민주시민교육" 2006

      3 중앙선거관리위원회, "재외선거에 관한 여론조사" 2007

      4 정의용, "재외국민에 대한 선거권 부여 문제 요지" 해외교포문제연구소 2005

      5 이종훈, "재외국민 참정권 문제 : 해외 부재자 투표 제도 재도입 방향" 해외교포문제연구소 2002

      6 정상우, "재외국민 선거권에 관한 헌법재판소 결정의 의미와 입법과제" 한국법제연구원 2007

      7 정극원, "재외국민 선거권부여와 공직선거법 개정안에 관한 검토" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 549-570, 2009

      8 정근식, "이중국적을 보는 사회적 시각, in 이중국적에 관한 법리적 검토" 법무부 2004

      9 조진만, "선거제도의 변화와 17대 총선" 한국학술정보 2006

      10 김현태, "선거운동의 자유와 공정에 관한 연구" 경기대학교 정치전문대학원 2007

      11 박상철, "선거관계 법제와 국민법의식 조사" 한국법제연구원 1995

      12 중앙선거관리위원회, "국외부재자투표 도입에 관한 재외국민 여론조사" 2007

      13 중앙선거관리위원회, "국외부재자투표 도입방안 연구" 2006

      14 박상철, "국민법의식조사연구" 한국법제연구원 1991

      15 중앙선거관리위원회, "각 국가의 재외선거 위법행위 발생사례와 투표율 향상을 위한 방안" 2009

      16 Raymond E. Wolfinger, "Who Votes?" Yale University Press 1980

      17 International IDEA, "Voting from Abroad" Trydellstryckeri AB 2007

      18 Evans, Jocelyn A. J., "Voters and Voting: An Introduction" Sage Publication 2004

      19 Fiorina Morris P., "Retrospective Voting in American National Elections" Yale University Press 1981

      20 McCarthy, John D., "Resources Mobilization and Social Movement: A Partial Theory" 86 (86): 1997

      21 박상철, "A Survey on the Korean People’s Attitude Towards Law" Korea Legislation Research Institute 1992

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 미국헌법연구
      외국어명 : Study on The American Constitution
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.68 0.68 0.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.73 0.72 0.798 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼