RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      도메인네임분쟁의 국제적 해결방법의 Forum Shopping과 1인 심판부 제도의 문제점 = A Study on Procedural Problems of International Domain Name Dispute Resolution; Focusing on the Forum Shopping and One-member Panel Problems

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101824247

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In order to meet this need for evicting cybersquatters, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers(“ICANN”) implemented the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy to afford trademark owners an international, non-judicial system...

      In order to meet this need for evicting cybersquatters, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers(“ICANN”) implemented the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy to afford trademark owners an international, non-judicial system against clear cases of abusive cybersquatting in the form of an expedited global administrative proceeding. Actually, the UDRP has apparently evolved into a globally popular solution for the battle against cybersquatting by providing a comparatively cost effective, expeditious, efficient alternative to international litigation. Despite the UDRP`s apparent success, the UDRP has been the subject of considerable criticism due to certain substantive and procedural problems revealed by its operation, the most telling of which include: UDRP policy bias in favor of trademark owners over domain name owners, forum shopping, reverse domain name hijacking, suppression of legitimate criticism sites and the lack of proper appellate procedures other than a costly sojourn in the courts. Thus, improvements in the UDRP system are vital for the continued success of the domain name dispute resolution system and its being reborn as a more fair and comprehensive global policy. If the UDRP could be reinforced with new mechanisms to cure its shortcomings, it would be a good model for resolving Internet domain name disputes until international treaties or substantive law emerge agreeing on one set of rules which would apply only to Internet disputes.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이대희, "전자상거래와 도메인문제에 관한 연구"

      2 崔 成 俊, "인터넷에서의 상표법상 문제점" 한국법학원 (87) : 27-46, 2005

      3 조정욱, "인터넷도메인분쟁연구" 박영사 2004

      4 이대희, "인터넷과 지적재산권법" 박영사 2002

      5 정찬모, "도메인이름분쟁해결의 실체법"

      6 "도메인이름분쟁백서"

      7 윤선희, "도메인네임 분쟁의 국제적 동향" (24) : 2001

      8 Annette Kur, "UDRP, A Study by theMax-Planck-Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law, Munichin Cooperation with Institute for Intellectual Property Law and Market Law,University of Stockholm, Institute for Information Law, TechnicalUniversity of Karlsruhe"

      9 Richard Garnett, "Trademarks and the Internet: Resolution of International IP Disputes by Unilateral Application of U.S.Laws"

      10 Victoria Holstein-Childress, "The UDRP as a Gatekeeper to Judicial Resolution of Competing Rights to Domain Names"

      1 이대희, "전자상거래와 도메인문제에 관한 연구"

      2 崔 成 俊, "인터넷에서의 상표법상 문제점" 한국법학원 (87) : 27-46, 2005

      3 조정욱, "인터넷도메인분쟁연구" 박영사 2004

      4 이대희, "인터넷과 지적재산권법" 박영사 2002

      5 정찬모, "도메인이름분쟁해결의 실체법"

      6 "도메인이름분쟁백서"

      7 윤선희, "도메인네임 분쟁의 국제적 동향" (24) : 2001

      8 Annette Kur, "UDRP, A Study by theMax-Planck-Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law, Munichin Cooperation with Institute for Intellectual Property Law and Market Law,University of Stockholm, Institute for Information Law, TechnicalUniversity of Karlsruhe"

      9 Richard Garnett, "Trademarks and the Internet: Resolution of International IP Disputes by Unilateral Application of U.S.Laws"

      10 Victoria Holstein-Childress, "The UDRP as a Gatekeeper to Judicial Resolution of Competing Rights to Domain Names"

      11 Jay P. Kesan, "The Market for Private Dispute Resolution Services – An Empirical Re-Assessment of ICANN-UDRP Performance"

      12 Karen Webb, "The Appeal of the Internet: Looking at the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and How It is Newly Influenced by the anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act"

      13 Zohar Efroni, "The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Ac tand the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy: New Opportunities For International Forum Shopping?"

      14 Holland, Brian H, "Tempest in a Teapot or Tidal Wave? Cybersquatting Rights and Remedies Run Amok"

      15 Mueller, "Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN’s UDRP"

      16 Jennifer Arnette-Mitchell, "State Action Debate Reborn Again: Why the Constitution Should Act as a Checking Mechanism for ICANN's Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"

      17 Mueller, Milton, "Rough Justice; An Analysis of ICANN's Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"

      18 William E. Ridgway, "Revitalizing the Doctrine of Trademark Misuse"

      19 Julie J. McMurry, "Policy Considerations from a Practitioner’s Perspective: The UDRP v. Traditional Litigation: May the Best Process Win"

      20 Sorkin, David E, "Judicial Review of ICANN Domain Name Dispute Decisions"

      21 Sue Ann Mota, "Internet Domain Name Disputes: Working Toward a Global Solution"

      22 Froomkin, Michael, "ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy: Causes and (Partial) Cures"

      23 Walker, Luke A, "ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy"

      24 Michael Geist, "ICANN and WIPO at Work: Towards a Paradigm of International Telecommunications Governance ?: Fair.com?: An Examination of the Allegations of Systemic Unfairness in the ICANNUDRP"

      25 Michael Geist, "Fundamentally Fair.com? An Update on Bias Allegations and the ICANN UDRP"

      26 Elizabeth G. Thornburg, "Fast, Cheap, and Out of Control: Lesson from the ICANN Dispute Resolution Process"

      27 David Allen Bernstein, "A Case for Mediating Trademark Disputes in the Age of Expanding Brands"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.55 0.818 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼