RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      PR 중간관리자 리더십 AHP평가 모형 연구 = (A) Study on the AHP Model for the Leadership of PR Middle-level Managers

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13552861

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Based on the AHP method, this study investigated evaluation items for the leadership of PR middle-level managers and identified the relative importance and priority. Using the AHP method with survey responses from 25 practitioners who work at PR agencies, this study showed the relative importance of evaluation items in three stages in the hierarchical structure map. In the first stage, task-oriented type is more important than relationship-oriented type. In the second stage, regarding task-oriented type, strategic thinking and behavior is the most important item, followed by problem-solving ability with clients and qualification as a role model. On the other hand, regarding relationship-oriented type, team management ability is most important, followed by communication ability and personality. The most important 10 among 29 evaluation items in the third stage are providing project goal, followed by ability of prioritizing, identifying abilities of team members, problem understanding, pursue for efficiency, suggesting work scope, communication with clients, decision making abilities, responsibility, and placing the right people to the right jobs. The seven items among top 10 are in task-oriented type because PR practitioners prefer task-oriented leaders who value achievements in competitive PR industry.
      번역하기

      Based on the AHP method, this study investigated evaluation items for the leadership of PR middle-level managers and identified the relative importance and priority. Using the AHP method with survey responses from 25 practitioners who work at PR agenc...

      Based on the AHP method, this study investigated evaluation items for the leadership of PR middle-level managers and identified the relative importance and priority. Using the AHP method with survey responses from 25 practitioners who work at PR agencies, this study showed the relative importance of evaluation items in three stages in the hierarchical structure map. In the first stage, task-oriented type is more important than relationship-oriented type. In the second stage, regarding task-oriented type, strategic thinking and behavior is the most important item, followed by problem-solving ability with clients and qualification as a role model. On the other hand, regarding relationship-oriented type, team management ability is most important, followed by communication ability and personality. The most important 10 among 29 evaluation items in the third stage are providing project goal, followed by ability of prioritizing, identifying abilities of team members, problem understanding, pursue for efficiency, suggesting work scope, communication with clients, decision making abilities, responsibility, and placing the right people to the right jobs. The seven items among top 10 are in task-oriented type because PR practitioners prefer task-oriented leaders who value achievements in competitive PR industry.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목 차
      • 제 1장 서론 1
      • 1. 문제제기 및 연구목적 1
      • 목 차
      • 제 1장 서론 1
      • 1. 문제제기 및 연구목적 1
      • 제 2장 문헌연구 및 이론적 배경 5
      • 1. 리더십 5
      • 1) 리더십 개념과 유형 5
      • 2) 중간관리자 리더십 9
      • 3) PR실무자 리더십 13
      • 2. PR 전문성 및 인력채용 평가 연구 16
      • 3. AHP를 이용한 광고 및 PR 분야 연구 19
      • 1) AHP의 특성 및 분석과정 19
      • 2) AHP를 이용한 광고 연구 20
      • 3) AHP를 이용한 PR 연구 21
      • 제 3장 연구문제 및 연구방법 23
      • 1. 연구문제 23
      • 2. 연구방법 23
      • 1) 평가요인 선정 및 계층 구조화 23
      • 2) 설문조사 및 분석 28
      • 제 4장 연구결과 30
      • 1. 단계별 중요도 분석 결과 30
      • 2. 전체 중요도 분석 결과 32
      • 제 5장 결론 및 제언 36
      • <참고문헌> 42
      • 부록 < 설 문 지> 48
      • <Abstract> 62
      • 표 목 차
      • <표 1> PR 중간관리자 리더십 평가 요인에 대한 세부 설명 25
      • <표 2> PR 중간관리자 리더십 평가요인의 중요도 및 우선순위 34
      • 그림 목차
      • <그림 1> PR 중간관리자 리더십 AHP평가 계층 구조도 27
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼