RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    자연존중의 정당화와 환경교육 = Justfication of Respect for Nature and Environmental Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19655399

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aim of this study is to clarify the meaning of `respect for nature`, to argue some grounds of justification to the value of it, and to suggest the desirable directions of environmental education on the bases of this justification argument. (1) `Respect for nature` is the one of moral principle that menbers of human beings should be follow to sustain and develop their ethical community. This principle is not selective and alternative. (2) The principle of `respect for nature` can be justified by two perspectives: instrumental justification and non-instrumental justification. The former argument can be justified by the amthropocentrism, the latter can be justified by biocentrism and ecocentrism. Anthropocentrism argue that only human beings have intrinsic value, moral duties and responsibilities. But biocentrism and ecocentrism assert that all living things has intrinsic value, and they have right to respect. They argue that modern or post modern environmental problems can not resolved by traditional ethical theories. Furthemore, they assert that radically different ethical theories have to function to solve the multiple problems happened in biotic communities or ecosystem. (3) The cruxes of a matter has comprised in non-instrumental justification arguement supported by biocentrism and ecocentrism. But this argument supply us with reflective thinking and introspection, and some implications to widen the scope of conceptions of `community`, moral duty and status, and responsibility. Notwithstanding, it will be persuade this argument into connected to practical environmental movements, and this movements have to spreads from individual dimension to groups of families, schools, industry and so on. It is important to us which schools must be teach and instruct to argue above argument systematically. (4) Environmental education for environmental ethics. Truthful environmental education must not actualize along with only teaching of technical methods of environmental sciences aiming to solve the biotic system and ecosystem. It is said that environmental education must be realised on the thorectical foundations of environmental philosophy or environmental ethics aiming to change of our anthropocentric prejudies fundamentally or radically.
    번역하기

    The aim of this study is to clarify the meaning of `respect for nature`, to argue some grounds of justification to the value of it, and to suggest the desirable directions of environmental education on the bases of this justification argument. (1) `R...

    The aim of this study is to clarify the meaning of `respect for nature`, to argue some grounds of justification to the value of it, and to suggest the desirable directions of environmental education on the bases of this justification argument. (1) `Respect for nature` is the one of moral principle that menbers of human beings should be follow to sustain and develop their ethical community. This principle is not selective and alternative. (2) The principle of `respect for nature` can be justified by two perspectives: instrumental justification and non-instrumental justification. The former argument can be justified by the amthropocentrism, the latter can be justified by biocentrism and ecocentrism. Anthropocentrism argue that only human beings have intrinsic value, moral duties and responsibilities. But biocentrism and ecocentrism assert that all living things has intrinsic value, and they have right to respect. They argue that modern or post modern environmental problems can not resolved by traditional ethical theories. Furthemore, they assert that radically different ethical theories have to function to solve the multiple problems happened in biotic communities or ecosystem. (3) The cruxes of a matter has comprised in non-instrumental justification arguement supported by biocentrism and ecocentrism. But this argument supply us with reflective thinking and introspection, and some implications to widen the scope of conceptions of `community`, moral duty and status, and responsibility. Notwithstanding, it will be persuade this argument into connected to practical environmental movements, and this movements have to spreads from individual dimension to groups of families, schools, industry and so on. It is important to us which schools must be teach and instruct to argue above argument systematically. (4) Environmental education for environmental ethics. Truthful environmental education must not actualize along with only teaching of technical methods of environmental sciences aiming to solve the biotic system and ecosystem. It is said that environmental education must be realised on the thorectical foundations of environmental philosophy or environmental ethics aiming to change of our anthropocentric prejudies fundamentally or radically.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼